Pros
- Quiet, handles well and is soft
Cons
- Strong imbalance from 110km/h
MICHELIN Primacy 4 215/55 R17 94V summer Review
38
·
Very good
Rating
4.0
Automotive, 🛠️ Replacement Parts, 🌬️ Windshield Wipers & Washers, 🛠️ Replacement Parts
Media
(7)
Photos by authors
(8)
Description of MICHELIN Primacy 4 215/55 R17 94V summer
Tire for medium and business class cars Comfortable urban tire with uncompromising grip on wet and dry surfaces. Safe New, Safe Worn Safe New, Safe Worn High Safety* #1 in Durability** * Tested by independent TÜV SÜD in July 2017 in size 205/55 R16 91V Xl. Measurements were taken on wet pavement while braking from 80 to 20 km/h. The braking distance of the new MICHELIN Primacy 4 tires is reduced by 0.9 meters compared to the average of competitors. And on tires MICHELIN Primacy 4 with significant tread wear (2 mm), the difference with other tires in the length of the braking distance will already...
Pros
- At 2.2, the "derzhak" is mad. To lower to 2 atm - softness as on a cloud.
Cons
- Not quite intelligible positioning of the tire by the company.
Pros
- Tires are imported. Production Poland
Cons
- The tires were 19. There was no way to contact the seller and find out the release date. The courier brought, the goods are whole, which means there are no reasons for refusal. I used to buy in tire stores and look at the year of manufacture. It was a little cheaper here.
Pros
- Quiet, soft, durable.
Cons
- Expensive. Shaking strongly.
Pros
- I don't regret my purchase because it rolls clearly and silently and because driving feels so different now. I adore it! This comparison with the Hankook Ventus Prime2 on the Kia Ceed 2022 must be fully understood! because when making a decision, I read many evaluations and occasionally you don't understand reality; someone describes the sensations and compares them to some sort of Nokia and Audi, which is obviously completely different.
Cons
- Price. To say goodbye to roughly 19,000 people was heartbreaking. Perhaps the pricing and quality should be so high:). Rubber MADE IN RUSSIA (and my efforts to locate the original suppliers proved fruitless; I could find no other suppliers whatsoever). And I also noted that the car started to coast worse (totally stops earlier than on the wood Hankook, it goes a shorter "coasting" distance, allegedly because of the soft rubber). I'm not sure if this has an impact on fuel economy, but I did notice this.
Pros
- -Extremely high-quality manufactured for 2022: no rough edges, no beating, everything adheres to high standards, plus a rubber compound that is incredibly soft to the touch;The sides are cleverly constructed; they feel thick to the touch but are not rough, and they effectively dampen bumps when driving. They also have excellent traction on both dry and wet roads.It appears to be quieter the faster you go; at 140 km/h, the difference from my prior tires is especially audible; I was unable to submerge it in puddles because, in theory, it has very strong hydroplaning resistance; nonetheless, we'll have to wait to compare it objectively when it eventually wears out;He experiences rutting, but only to a certain degree (rutting is typically a cursed characteristic of tricks); -Does not tan, so up to zero degrees it does not lose to my winter Velcro.
Cons
- -BALANCING. I haven't had this yet; I have two 15-60 wheels and one 10-50 wheel. This is the biggest and possibly the only real negative right now; if, as a result, the wheels do not begin to pound into the suspension within a year, I will increase the rating to five; -Easy steering after 215 Goodyear, but a person is given a special gift of self-learning and adaptability to the environment, so for me it is not critical; -Small enough price difference with the Pilot Spot.
Pros
- Soft, quiet, and easy to handle
Cons
- pronounced unbalance at 110 km/h
Pros
- Sadly, their flaws have marked them as eliminated.
Cons
- Poor service, expense, safety, and workmanship.
Pros
- great traction on both dry and wet roads. quite quiet. The wind howled, and I wanted to take the window deflectors off since the higher the speed, the quieter it was. On bumps, soft and comfy. It handles ruts really well (the car doesn't scour). extreme braking. Nothing aquaplaning.
Cons
- unable to locate.
Pros
- Plus: + great braking in dry and wet conditions + very quiet on good pavement and at speeds of 15+ + Michelin guarantee works (replaced a punctured tire without question) + good handling (depending on pressure) + quite comfortable tires + well swallows small irregularities, not bad in the medium and recumbent:) + does not get closer to 0 + keeps + 200 km/h without problems, there are no pulsations for the car or the driver + balancing to zero (I
Cons
- There is no hook in comparison to the PlayStation 4 (200+ one-legged horses), rubber for family people like myself, and there is no noise from the car if the pressure is more than 2.4, the temperature is less than 15, and the asphalt is rough. - lacks precision of control - scoops up pebbles and hurls them, especially after rain, against the fender liner Take it, rubber is great for you if you despise tagging and traffic light battles. I don't need it either, but driving a Vag hot hatch is exciting, and the excitement is diminished on cheap rubber due of poor handling.
Pros
- Quite on excellent pavement Holds the road securely in poor weather penetrated via a hole (see below)
Cons
- 20 and 21-year-old rubber (2 wheels, 2 such). no cracks, entire from the outside Costly for my radius of 235/45 R18
Pros
- Cost, handling in dry and rainy conditions, and noise
Cons
- No indication
Pros
- Not Korean, but one of a few alternatives I discovered in the size 235/60 R17.
Cons
- Everything else: Weigh in! - price Thin plank
Pros
- One, the advertised short stopping distance is accurate. Second, it has great rut and hydroplane resistance. Third, it is more resistant to wear. They said this in ads as well, although it's unclear if this is true after only one season. 4. Noise. There's nothing objectively wrong with the Skoda Octavia, other than its noisy tires and subpar sound insulation. From what we can see, after switching to MICHELIN Primacy 4, they didn't start raising their voices in the cabin or turn up the level on the radio cassette player. But ever since I put on the new winter Dunlop WM002 (they're notoriously noisy), I've had to crank up the volume on the radio and elevate my voice to be heard by my fellow passengers in the back.
Cons
- One, the high resistance to rolling. More than a liter of fuel is being used for every 100 kilometers now. It's not a fairy tale; it's a reality. In the month of November, while I am writing this evaluation, I have already switched to winter tires. Normal levels of consumption were quickly restored. I shall illustrate one manifestation of rolling resistance. Strogino, Katukova St., next to McDonald's, is a long, straight stretch of road where I frequently drive. When I get going at the first light but then see red at the second, I ease off the gas and let the car coast to the second light, where I can safely apply the brakes when the light turns green. Specifically, GOODYEAR's EfficientGrip Performance. And on MICHELIN Primacy 4, the vehicle comes to a complete halt (!) after 20 meters, as if someone had lightly pressed on the brake and not released it. Also, "wadded wheel" is a synonym. This is actually a benefit rather than a drawback. These tires are designed for peace and quiet, not "playing tag at a speed of 150 km/h." You get the hang of controlling the new wheels in no time, and you just crank the steering wheel more sharply as you approach a corner. Dated 2022 production. Maybe that’s why everything has been going wrong.
Pros
- Low-key, cozy, and noise-free
Cons
- The first is obvious: sugar doesn't come cheap. The second - they make a slight howling sound, but nothing too serious *But, possibly it also relies on the wheel diameter, car make, and asphalt condition.
Pros
- Comfortable, rather noisy, and a joy to drive.
Cons
- We visit and investigate while they are absent.
