Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 38
  • 5
    18
  • 4
    10
  • 3
    5
  • 2
    4
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Perfect product for any user!

It is sad that after 1.5 months of operation, on a long-distance drive, he encountered a portion of the road with asphalt gone and no signs of road maintenance. I got it for my father, who is happy with it. The outcome of the meeting was the loss of two wheels and disks (flaming greetings to RosAvtodor). I therefore greatly regretted the fact that there was no absolute warranty for summer tires (although there was one for winter tires made by the same manufacturer). The operation of a slightly…

Pros
  • Low rolling resistance; quiet (much quieter than the preceding model); and excellent handling on wet roads.
Cons
  • For some reason, local retailers are severely lacking the size 225/45 K17, so when I had to get a few wheels quickly, I had to call a number of businesses.

I assumed it would roll gently and not think. Satisfied. has benefits holds extremely well on both dry and wet pavement (especially in cold temperatures). Soft, excellent to roll over small bumps, and it improved on speed bump comfort (before, some sort of continental was a little less expensive). Cons: Rubber isn't very silent. Any decent pavement makes a "plastic" sound, similar to some yakohamas. The sound is not very loud; acceleration makes it more audible. Not in breeches that I've seen…

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The average product, you can find a better one.

The initial reaction upon installation was as though I had not swapped to winter tires. The gravel asphalt we normally use has a terrific rumbling. After about a thousand kilometers, things quieted down (or maybe it was just getting warmer), which leads us to our second observation: rubber becomes substantially stiffer when the temperature drops below +10°C/+15°F. Due to an increase in grooves, the contact patch is narrower than that of rivals. Although it was a contentious ruling, driving…

Pros
  • Slowed down, rainy driving
Cons
  • Distraction, ease, and cost

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A nice option for the money, one of the best deals.

Before that, I had traveled roughly 1000 kilometers. Bridgeston Mi 2. I spent a very long time looking for reviews, but other than on the official Michelin website, I couldn't locate any. Nevertheless, I chose to purchase it because Michelin sells it exclusively throughout the summer. Accidentally proezdil on the bridge. The Michelin Primus 4 tire is incredibly comfy, quiet, and enjoyable to ride on. Although it was slightly better on Bridzhik, the curves were considerably tighter, the car…

Pros
  • tire that is quite cozy. very little distance between stops. on both dry and muddy roads. I was pleasantly delighted to find that the car slows down much like on dry pavement, even on the supposedly "soap" in the road.
Cons
  • Mazda 3's steering wheel was reduced to a little "cotton" size.

I got what I expected; the initial impression is very positive; there was no Michelin before; however, now that there is something to compare with, I anticipate that the new model will fare no worse than its predecessor in objective comparison; that is, in the tests conducted by journalists; however, Primaci 3 continues to lead the pack in many of these tests. Hydroplaning is still at large, despite being subjectively quiet and soft. Primacy 3, Conti Premium Contact 5, and maybe Nokian Blue 2…

Pros
  • Very low noise level; very comfortable; very good hold; very light (subjectively; I didn't weigh it); good value; I purchased one in mid-February from a well-known online retailer for $4080; since then, the price has risen with the changing of the seasons; thus, purchase summer items in the dead of winter.
Cons
  • It grabs onto tiny pebbles and then discards them, causing them to bang against the wheel arches. Neither Yokohama nor Bridgestone nor Continental nor Toyo nor Dunlop nor Kama did the same, making them all unusable for riding. It's not very irritating, but it is a drawback, since you rarely have to drive over little pebbles.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Does not meet my expectations, it was not worth buying.

Before that, I had a MICHELIN Primacy HP 205/55 R16 91V made in France on my Honda Akkord. Proezdil on it for 9 years, about 70,000 tons km. Well, very happy with the tires. II. I bought a MICHELIN Primacy 4 made in 2022. (the seller claimed that they are produced under the supervision and technologies of MICHELIN. three from 10-50 to 15-65 the last one was rotated several times on the disk until the computer gave out 43-43 and wrote that: - "it's better not to do it" (probably the machine got…

Pros
  • Haven't found it yet. I'll go, it may appear.
Cons
  • Severe tire imbalance. Rigid, even at 2.2 pressure. Noisy.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product, more pros than cons.

Handling is better than primacy 3, the noise is stronger than in primacy 3, it's good in the rain - but there are not enough stars from the sky. It is on my father's Mondeo 3 and Audi A4 b7 my car - our general opinion is average tires - not quiet - not soft - average, it's normal in the rain - but not like dry. From my experience the rating is 3.7 out of 5. Different pros: Good: -controllability - swallows bumps - insensitive to track Got cons: The noise was about 3.5 out of 5 and the primacy…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

Some pros: Prior to that, there were Bridgestone potenza, the noise level in the cabin has become much less, the rubber is soft. Definitely satisfied with the purchase With its cons: The car became a little more rolling in corners, but in general everything suits

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good purchase.

Pros: The car goes confidently, steers clearly, over bumps - quite softly, there is enough comfort. Brakes well. Different cons: I didn't find any serious cons. Noise is above average. They said on the tavern that the sidewall is soft, you should be careful with deep holes. Let's see.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not my best purchase, you could have found something else.

Able to tire size 215 55R18. I took Michelin specifically for comfort, so the car I have is a Camry and does not have it for sports driving. And I got completely different properties that I expected from the tire. The tires turned out to be not a comfortable weight, the asphalt profile is given to the body and my back. It's like the wheels are over-inflated. Production 2022. Disappointed in tires. Not much money has been spent. For those who think that this is anti-advertising. Here is my phone

Pros
  • Handling is excellent
Cons
  • The main drawback that annoys me is the rigidity, the tires do not swallow the joints, small irregularities in the roughness. The entire asphalt profile is transmitted.

I replaced the Yokogama Geolandar G91, on which the Forester 4 came from the factory. The old rubber was worn out by 60 percent, 4 mm of tread remained. Michelin compared to the old one is noticeably softer, as if a pillow appeared between the tire and the body. On most surfaces it became quieter, especially felt on large bumps, such as speed bumps. The rutting is excellent. Brakes too. A very solid tire, but the Forester has lost sharp handling and no longer provokes sharp maneuvers, does not…

Pros
  • Soft, quiet. It follows the course well, after irregularities it quickly stabilizes. Does not "fatigue" the driver. Best suited for long trips. Low fuel consumption. Overall, I highly recommend it.
Cons
  • Tire for pensioners. The car lost some of its former handling and feedback.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not a bad product, but you can find better.

I chose tires for the summer for glk. The problem with them is a very bad dimension, that you can’t find rubber for it. I read the reviews, like the norms of rubber, it costs like a cast-iron bridge, the rating is normal - let me think I'll try. Changed shoes from winter Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV. Before that, there were Continentals 4x4 contact and Coopers and something else - I don’t remember for 10 years of operation. After the tire fitting, at first I didn’t understand what happened: it’s

Pros
  • One of a couple of options that I found in the amount of 235/60 R17, not Koreans.
Cons
  • All the rest: - WEIGHT! - price - thin board

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A valuable purchase, some advantages!

205/55/R16. Lada Xray. Before this rubber operated Bridgestone Ecopia EP200. I felt the difference immediately, as soon as I left the tire fitting box (it even looks and feels softer than the Bridge). The handling of the Primacy 4 is much better. In the rain, in a rut, the car stands like a glove. There is not even a hint of yaw and hydroplaning, unlike the Bridgestone Ecopia. And they are much quieter than the Bridgestone. Perhaps the price for a low noise level will be rapid wear, but at the…

Pros
  • Excellent handling on dry and wet pavement. Very low noise level. Moreover, the higher the speed, the less noise (I wanted to remove the deflectors from the windows, because the howl of the wind was heard). Soft and comfortable on bumps. It behaves very well in a rut (the car does not scour). Very fast braking. No aquaplaning.
Cons
  • Have not found.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product, more pros than cons.

To be honest, for the price, I expected more. Got a side cut on a gravel road after a week of operation. Very thin sides. MMC Outlander, rakhord increased by a liter and a half compared to native rubber. It seems that the rubber is soft, but in terms of comfort in the car, the bumps in the road are very well felt. Handling, too, which is not sharp, for such a profile. Short tires for a quiet, careful ride.

Pros
  • Quiet, excellent road holding, short braking distance. The car just sticks to the road. Perfectly balanced, at least for me.
Cons
  • Increased fuel consumption. Very thin sidewalls, It is better not to drive on gravel and sharp stones.

BMW f10 car. Tires bought a couple of months ago. Prior to Primacy 4, I used ContiSportContact 5 and Nokian Hakka Black 1 version. (If anyone is interested, the conti ride is much nicer, the hakka is more oaky, noisier, more bumpy, AND 1.5 kg heavier per wheel! But the conti has 2 hernias) At first, he was quite upset. The steering wheel became light and empty, the tires were light, and, having installed them, it seemed that even too much: When hitting more serious bumps, there is a certain…

Pros
  • Comfort
Cons
  • Lost steering sharpness

Revainrating 3 out of 5

There are pluses and minuses, think before you buy.

On another car, there is a Toyo Proxes CF2 in the same size and with more mileage, it is still enough to drive aggressively and drive it. Some pros: Rubber is really very quiet and soft in any case in the dimension 225/60R17. Road holding is excellent, braking is 5, but in every barrel of honey . Has cons: Wear resistance is very poor. Two seasons, mileage of 22 thousand km on an all-wheel drive car and there is a chance to do a maximum of 10 thousand more and to throw it away. I hoped that at…