Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Ada Bokowska - Haczk ᠌ photo
1 Level
169 Review
0 Karma

Review on Samsung Galaxy S9 G965F (International Version) by Ada Bokowska - Haczk ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best offers, glad I bought it.

I'd like to say hello to everyone who read my review. I want to start by mentioning that there are a number of reasons why I purchased this phone to replace my previous Sony Xperia Z5 Dual. Despite the megapixels, the camera was slow, of poor quality, and had a weak battery. It was decided that you should eat. I selected a phone with a camera in mind, but now that I know better, the rest wasn't really that necessary since, for instance, I don't play games in general. As a consequence, even though there were many difficult options, the Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 256GB was selected. Even though tests indicate that the version on the Snapdragon 855 offers the best performance for the money, I still wanted to get the most for my money. However, in the end, I decided to go with the version on the Exynos because I trusted the data showing that it has better autonomy. I want to mention right away two things that shocked me greatly after switching from the Sony Xperia Z5: the camera and performance. I guess I expected there would be a difference, but there was a significant one. Nonetheless, the Snapdragon 810 in my prior smartphone wasn't a particularly weak chipset, but the Samsung Exynos 9810 proved to be (!) Speed and the camera are simply things, of course, especially given my experience with Sony and their flawed camera software. I was even more shocked to learn that Samsung manufactured the matrix for the camera; I had always assumed they were inferior than Sony's. The size was the one thing that wasn't very convenient at first, but with time I grew accustomed to it and found it to be really comfortable. Because this phone is still made by Samsung, who are experts at creating screens for smartphones, the screen is obviously absolutely stunning. The only major drawback, by far, is that the Samsung engineers miscalculated the battery's capacity. However, I believe it was still feasible to raise it to at least 4000 mAh, and ideally 4500 mAh. It's possible to go on and on about this phone's benefits, but since space is at a premium, I'll just say: buy it. You won't regret it.

img 1 attached to Samsung Galaxy S9 G965F (International Version) review by Ada Bokowska - Haczk ᠌



Pros
  • Screen cover for a camera (very pleasant to the touch) Stereo speakers and a back cover made of glass - Execution (very fast) - Charges reasonably fast (even with fast charging turned off) - Pleasant to the touch (needs to get used to) - a s s t e n t Skin for Samsung Android Alpine Alpine Alpine Alpine Alpine Alpine Alpine Alpine Alpine Alpine Alpine Alpine Alpine Alpine Alpine Alpine Alpine Fo Fo Fo (you can also measure pressure) ― Dust and moisture protection of IP-68
Cons
  • Insufficient autonomy, but 3500 mAh is not enough for this phone, I think it was necessary to put at least 4000 mAh in this phone. For some people, the size may seem like, in fact, for me at first, I got used to it over time. - Under some lighting circumstances, rounded corners dazzle (sometimes very severely), distorting the display and requiring you to turn the phone. It is exceedingly challenging to adhere the film to the screen without creating bubbles at the corners because of the rounded edges (even for professionals)

Similar reviews