Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Ha Joon photo
1 Level
105 Review
78 Karma

Review on Canon 35Mm USM Wide Angle Lens by Ha Joon

Revainrating 3 out of 5

I expected more from the purchase, but not the worst option.

The video is stabilizing, but don't expect miracles. For several weeks intensively tested in combination with 6D. Once again, I was convinced that autofocus, sharpness and other characteristics for which tech bloggers praise Canon so much. it's just a great job of PR people. It smears worse than Sony. I have several Canon lenses with a red ring - the problems are about the same everywhere. Focus and sharpness is just a myth created by Canon PR people. I bought this lens for walking, so as not to carry large and heavy ones with a red rim. I have long noticed that autofocus, sharpness, and other qualities of Canon are no better than those of other brands. I don't understand where this myth comes from? Perhaps I am always unlucky and come across the worst examples of Canon equipment. But the number of clear frames never exceeds 50%. Always some kind of problem. Bought in Pleer. Ru. The price is great. Delivery too. But the lens itself is not at all what hundreds of reviews say about it. I do not want to drive on the seller, as others often do. Miracles don't happen. More or less adequate for the money, but nothing more.

img 1 attached to Canon 35Mm USM Wide Angle Lens review by Ha Joon



Pros
  • Compact, inexpensive, with stabilization.
Cons
  • Stabilization is so-so. Autofocus is sometimes noisy, slow and often wrong. Sharpness is often past.

Comments (1)

Please, sign in to write a comment
October 26, 2022
After fifty dollars, I discovered a different world for myself. I'm an amateur, not a pro.