Review on 📷 Zeiss Classic Planar ZF.2 T 1.4/50 Lens for Nikon F-Mount Cameras: A Black Standard Camera Lens for SLR/DSLR Photography (1767825) by Boyan Lalov ᠌

The manual focus encouraged me to shoot more, it’s more interesting for me. And then autofocus portraits are somehow not ice. Handles even on af lenses work better. Different pros: Compared directly with the existing nikon 58mm f / 1.4 on the D750. Matrix in 24mp quite allows. If more, then it won’t pull, there you need to look at the milvus. And vice versa, carrying a huge and heavy milvus on matrices up to 25 megapixels, well, for an amateur, there is no big sense. Zeiss has an interesting "plastic" pattern and natural colors. Nikon gives a slightly lighter picture and has interesting plasticity only at 1.4 and 1.6. Zeiss always. There is almost no difference in colors. Nikon is sharper on the open. It's hard to choose between them. Here the question is whether you like the drawing from the Zeiss. It is rather old school and more lively and voluminous than Nikon. From Zeiss you see a person, and from Nikon a very high-quality image of a person. I shoot family and friends, so everything is about portraits. Until I decided what to leave. But on the carc, the Zeiss looks much more compact. Has cons: Not modern standards for sharpness at 1.4-1.6: soft, which is good for female portraits in good light. The lens hood is cool, but it’s inconvenient to put on the cover, it.