Review on Renewed Samsung Galaxy A50 Verizon Smartphone in Black with 64GB Storage by Andrey Kolev ᠌

Name: Renewed Samsung Galaxy A50 Verizon Smartphone in Black with 64GB Storage
Item: Renewed Samsung Galaxy A50 Verizon Smartphone in Black with 64GB Storage
Rating: 4

July 17, 2023

I like everything, the price and the quality are both ok.

The phone has a good price to quality ratio overall. If you don't want to go to China and need a solid "brand" phone for a reasonable price, this is a fantastic option.

But. Despite being a Samsung product, it should be kept in mind that this is a weak, cheap model rather than the company's flagship. Although this person works for the government, they possess all of the "software" chips of their older sibling.

Despite the listed disadvantages, I believe it to be the most suited competitor.

If you let me select between A50 and Honor 8x, I'll pick A50. I picked A50 over P30L and Samsung.

One device stands out: the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7. I looked and felt. Of course, the screen is inferior, but it is also 4 less expensive. In terms of price and quality, it triumphs since it is more attractive and robust.
The lack of nfc is the sole drawback. Samsung was picked for this reason. He would not even glance at the Samsung if he were in Xiao.

So, choose the "seven" if you require a state employee but not nfc. If not, feel free to take this item without bothering to make a decision.

P.S. A constantly functioning network, a few pictures, ten minutes of conversations, four hours of browsing the cart (which includes movies and photos), and two hours of listening to music are sufficient for fourteen hours.
The necessity is not entirely met. (The older brother A70, for instance, has 500 more.) I would like more.

Prior to that, I completely forgot to charge my Xiao Note 4x. At the end of the day, 40% were still in place under the same system.

Fast charging, though, can theoretically make up for this. Of course, a crutch, however.

In terms of price-quality, it is good in theory, but. The "BUT" is right here. It has a problem, but I'm unable to projectively identify what it is. There is a jamb, there is a jamb, they did it cheaply here, something is wrong, it doesn't work that way. Not what you anticipate from Samsung.

Samsung is a "A" brand, capitalization included. But this. Subjectively speaking, it is far less enjoyable than xiao Not 7.

Most likely, I would still suggest this smart. most likely.

Pros

1. The Price was the first and most significant factor in the assessment. Additionally, all of the "pros" and "cons" were evaluated in light of the device's 16k price. 2. A lush, vibrant screen. 3. A battery with enough capacity to last a full day of work. 4. Resilient. I already did a check. 5. AUX was left in place despite Type-C being present. 6. NFC 7. No critical problems or freezes were discovered, and the work is fluid. The firmware is unfinished, but more on that later. 8. There is a rapid charge option, which occasionally helps.

Cons

1. PWM in low-light conditions. It may be harmful to your health and eyes. I recently acquired a gadget with the newest firmware; it is hardly noticeable. If you pay close attention. In the past, it was just vyrviglaz. 2. RAW firmware, which is, to be honest, flawed. I feel as though I purchased Xiaomi. Very astonished by Samsung's stance in this matter. China has dominated the market, which is understandable, but it is imperative to catch up as soon as possible, at any costs. If more specifically, then the most annoying thing is that the phone's orientation occasionally remains the same. For instance, it will set to be horizontal and won't go back to being vertical. Change won't occur before blocking and unblocking. You wait for it to roll over while standing like a fool. It even has humor. More will be said about the on-screen print "something" later. 3. A camera. I'll be honest. Although it appears that there are three of them, there isn't even a single typical one. It shoots at the level of the Honor 8x, occasionally better and occasionally worse. If all of the "software" upgrades to the stock firmware are disabled, Honor is superior. In general, yuck, Dishman xiao level. (4) Screen printing. It's just ugly, that's all. Poor, sluggish job. Sometimes it recognizes the same finger immediately away, other times it loses its ability to do so for two seconds. The difference between the cases in this instance is 5 seconds. Quite primitive and inconvenient technology. What is on this and what is on the ten. I fail to see how this could be offered for sale. 5. Just three hues. Cheap blue, more-or-less passable white, and dirty black. Observe Xiao 7. Gorgeous phone with a great appearance. It's unclear why "A" brand released this. 6. Very. VERY FAT firmware, I guess. Simply said, it takes up a lot of room. The weight of all the software and the empty bucket on the old phone was less than that of the most recent Samsung firmware. 7. Because there are so few modified firmwares, the phone is still rather new. Yes, and not just because they'll show up later. 8. Despite seeming like gold, it has a really cheap, "weak" plastic feel. Even when I am wearing a case and a phone with gl, the total effect is still negative.