Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Michal Kucharski ᠌ photo
1 Level
338 Review
0 Karma

Review on Tires Michelin Primacy 3 205/55 R16 91V runFlat by Michal Kucharski ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Satisfied with the purchase one hundred percent, I recommend the product for everyone.

The Michelin has more than met my expectations for me. Rubber 225/45 R17, vehicle Volvo S60 170 horsepower Because I have a low profile, I bounce between 2.5 and 2.4. After traveling at 90 kilometers per hour, I have no idea who is there. Despite the fact that I have poor control of the vehicle, I go an average of 140 kilometers per hour on the highway. Sometimes I speed up and go even quicker, and nobody seems to have any issues with it. In addition, it functions quite well in the urban environment. It does not slip when I start off quickly, and the braking is consistent throughout. Additionally, water drains quite nicely. To put it another way, you have a good feel for your automobile when you drive on this rubber. I can imagine that on a higher profile and with low tire pressure, the car drives poorly, which is why some of the unfavorable reviews have been written. However, I have to own that I was taken aback when I read them. The actual Michelin rubber has a relatively soft and springy consistency, much like a quality eraser. As a consequence of this, the adherence to the coating is quite good. When I was shopping for this rubber, I couldn't help but note how smooth and "sticky" it was. The tread was very shallow. Simply by taking a glance at it, we can tell that it is a high-quality rubber for asphalt. No noise, no resistance. This accounts for the poor performance off-road. However, within this context, everyone makes their own decision regarding the degree to which they require this criterion. My home is in Hong Kong, and when I'm not there, I enjoy taking long drives around the surrounding countryside, as well as through the city. Her lackluster off-road abilities do not disturb me in the least. If I were driving my car, I wouldn't get stuck in the mud anyway, but it's a lot of fun to get to where I need to go when the road is dry. By the way, the tires did not blow out on the way to the dacha along the Rogachevsky Highway, despite the road's reputation for being twisting and difficult to traverse. As a result of the information presented above, I have come to the conclusion that the rubber lives up to all of my expectations. Despite the fact that I had to spend money on it, I will recommend it to my friends. The only thing that remains unknown is the number of seasons it will continue for. Also, keep in mind that safe driving practices, not high-quality tires, are the primary factor in determining the level of traffic risk in any given area.

Pros
  • - a reasonable price (one that is proportional to the product's quality); - in my opinion, a nice balance between the firmness and suppleness of the rubber; - virtually no sensation of platinum; a very good hold on asphalt, whether it is dry or wet; a low impact on the environment due to the shallow tread; complete silence.
Cons
  • If certain flaws were nevertheless discovered in his winter Goodyear, then they are not present here for me. The fact that riding on rubber is impossible when the ground is muddy. You guys really need to get this straight: this is an option that just involves taking the freeway. It is recommended that climbing be avoided if there is a wet primer ahead. Simply put, it does not come with a clutch, which, as I mentioned in the previous paragraph, there should not be.