Apparently Canon really saved on the matrix, its quality is terrible. Yes, here is a full frame, and it saves the situation a little, because there is a depth of space and color, but only in very good conditions it is visible. For those who switch from crop, the shortcomings of the matrix may at first be invisible. But before 6d mark2 I had several dormouse and 5d mark 2 and the picture on it is many times better than on 6d mark 2. On 5d the picture is clean, the dynamic range is good. Here, on 6d mark 2, the shadows are already at ISO 100, and just everywhere at ISO more than 100 an unpleasant dirty noise appears. This matrix spoils all the good impression about the camera as a whole, which has many advantages: it is comfortable, well-assembled, albeit made of plastic and metal. Excellent autofocus. But sorry, the main thing in the camera is the picture. transmission of reality, that is, the matrix. And she's bad here. I thought it might be the abundance of pixels, but no, then I started shooting on 5d mark 4 with the same lenses and the picture is many times better, and the noise is small, like on 5d mark 2. In general, I don’t advise this camera to anyone, especially for that kind of money, it’s better to take a mark4 or canon R on credit In the photo, an example of a non-working ISO 1600 in the daytime is rubbed, when you go out of sharpness, immediately unpleasant noise and loss of detail
Nikon D3100 DSLR Camera with Auto Focus-S Nikkor Zoom Lens (Discontinued by Manufacturer)
109 Review
Revamped Sony Alpha a6000 Mirrorless Digital Camera: 24.3MP SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD and Power Zoom Lens
103 Review
Canon PowerShot A480 camera, black
108 Review
Canon EOS 60D: 18MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera Body - Your Next Photography Companion
125 Review