Review on Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002 by Wiktor Redziski ᠌

I never considered selling it while I was using it. As if I had actively sought out drawbacks. I tried and succeeded. But each time, I paused and gave it a fair assessment. And every single time I realized I required it. focal lengths that are quite practical for me. It works well for documentaries. Personally, I think this is significant. The picture's "juiciness" and "razor" sharpness. And all of this is due to the absence of Photoshop. (However, regrettably, there is now. But there, cutting-edge technology is used for everything. This lens seems to have been designed from the start with dependability and efficiency in mind. Those who assert that the 24-105 and non-L lenses produce identical images are also correct. There is a distinction. Naturally, corrections produce images that are of higher quality. And of course, bring a 13 5 mm L lens if you only intend to shoot portraits. They are almost the same in price. However, I place a premium on this lens' effectiveness, thus I judge it from these angles. People who were fixated on color and sharpness did the world a disservice. if you consider it to be a tool. You will start to judge his work once you have visited enough websites with photos that have only been altered in photoshop. If so, you won't enjoy 135 mm L either.