I've been shooting 28-300 since 2022. Until 2022, I had 2 of these lenses. To be honest, I have not seen anything better, although I have been working as a photographer for over 20 years. For "vanilla girls" or "professional photographers" who shoot weddings, it probably won't do. It provokes close-ups, although it makes it possible to shoot from a focal length of 28mm! I would advise these people "fifty dollars 1.4" for 10 thousand, or even 1.8 - for 3 thousand. And cheap, and the picture is in the "trend" . If speed, efficiency, mobility without loss of picture quality are important to you, - 28-300 is for you! Well, unless, of course, it's a pity to give 100-130 thousand for it. And those who write that itβs impossible for them to shoot in the dark - they simply didnβt hold it in their hands . Believe me, under equal conditions (say, in a dark theater hall or at a football match), in comparison with telephoto lenses with aperture ratio of 2.8, shooting 28-300 is flawed does not feel himself. And in many ways it even wins . Modern "carcasses" allow you to raise the ISO to the required short shutter speeds without loss of quality, and the excellent stabilization system 28-300 also helps.
Canon EOS SLR Camera Lens EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM
124 Review
Nikon 50mm f/1.8D Lens: Perfect for Nikon DSLR Cameras!
97 Review
π· Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G Lens with Auto Focus: Perfect for Nikon DSLR Cameras
76 Review
New Nikon 18-105mm Vibration Reduction π· Zoom Lens with Auto Focus for Nikon DSLRs
104 Review