Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Mateusz Grabowski ᠌ photo
1 Level
305 Review
0 Karma

Review on MAXXIS Bravo AT-771 225/65 R17 102T summer by Mateusz Grabowski ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not everything is so bad, but there are disadvantages.

Rubber on top, completely smitten with love. At the end of April, delivery was completed (size 215/65/16). maintaining equilibrium without any issues. I was able to test it out in the snow, where it performed quite well, as well as on sand and dirt. After only a few thousand miles, I noticed that the front wheels were beginning to show signs of wear. The back is fine. The fact that it collapsed not once, but twice demonstrates that the vehicle is operating correctly. Yes, and the region that was worn down by contact with the road was the entire surface. As a direct consequence of this, between the months of May and August, and over the course of ten thousand runs, at least twenty-five percent of the tread on the front wheels and up to ten percent of the tread on the rear wheels was eaten away. The wheels have approximately 20-22 thousand kilometers worth of total mileage on them. On the highway, the average speed never went higher than 130 miles per hour. The majority of the time, I was traveling between 90 and 110 kilometers per hour. It is not possible to deduct the amount of wear and tear caused by a long ride at high speeds. In general, tires should last for no more than 50,000 kilometers. To tell you the truth, I'm dissatisfied, and my money was wasted. It's been another year since we started working with this rubber. My rating is now a 3, up from 2 before. To the rear of Abkhazia and around 20,000 kilometers away. The wheels at the front were moved to the back, and the wheels at the back were moved to the front. It is clear that a set of wheels was not of the highest quality since the wear and tear on them can be seen much more easily. Even though this pair is not a replacement in the traditional sense, you can still ride for an entire season. Two wheels are all that are need for the upcoming campaign. Rubber that already has microscopic cracks in it (dry). The punctures were caused by wear and tear. Steel cord. There is not a single cone, hernia, "leading," or any other kind of abnormality. It is interesting to hear the opinions of individuals who have read my review (albeit the vast majority do not believe it to be helpful). Review by a guy who actually traveled approximately 50,000 kilometers on this rubber, beginning in Rybachy on Kola and ending in Kodor in Abkhazia. This journey took them to the Lost World in Crimea. I'm sorry, but I can't upload a photo to prove its legitimacy. The rubber is serviceable for rowing, exhibiting durability on the rock as well as in the pits, and performing well on asphalt. Everything appears to be in working order, with the notable exception of the wear, which was simply disastrous during the initial season of use. When exposed to the heat of the sun, the rubber melted away like ice cream. It's probable that I will make another purchase.

Pros
  • Rows, low noise level, exceptional road holding ability (for A/T tires), holes are easily swallowed, and high level of durability.
Cons
  • WEAR!