Review on Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 215/55 R17 94V summer by Petar Andreev ᠌

I decided to go with it because it was reasonably priced and had received positive feedback from customers. For the sake of maintaining as much objectivity as possible, I'll start by stating that I have a Volvo S60 with front-wheel drive, a size 205/55R16, and that I put Kontiki tires on the driving wheels while Michelin Energy Saver tires remained on the rear wheels. In general, people have contradictory reactions; I anticipated that it would be routine to roll, but alas, the miracle did not take place. Below are some advantages: 1. Excellent while traveling on a route that is perfectly level and when traveling in a straight line. 2. Excellent when hydroplaning. 3. in a state of equilibrium 4. Price Some cons: 1. They exhibit poor behavior over any bumps, including when you cross basic road markings (yeah, yes, Karl marks!). In a rut, it simply throws the vehicle from side to side. 2. Horrible steering even after a simple rebuild; it felt as if the car was floating or the wheels were flat; increasing or decreasing the pressure in the tires did not assist. 3. Noise . I've seen some reviews that mention how peaceful the place is. No matter what, winter tires with studs don't create nearly as much noise as you may think they might; truly, I wanted to switch back to my old shoes. 4. Poor traction, and in times of emergency or rapid braking, the anti-lock braking system (ABS) frequently operates on completely dry pavement; however, the Michelin ES comes to an immediate halt. 5. Production 2022 (if you really want to find fault with it, albeit the older Michelins are also 2022 production)