4K High Refresh has come a long way: early monitors required dedicated fans and had very few inputs. Current generation displays are better, but the often-recommended Gigabyte models don't have the full bandwidth of hdmi 2.1 48Gbps, while the LG and ASUS models are overpriced. /O (6 USB ports that can be connected to 3 input sources via KVM). I didn't play around with the settings enough to be able to draw any firm conclusions about the image quality, but at first glance there's nothing to complain about. There are no dead pixels, minimal IPS glow and vignette. 4k at 32 inches also feels just as tight as at 27 inches. Small additions that I appreciate: a customizable macro button on the bottom left, programmatic control of monitor settings (Windows only), RGB backlighting that can reflect what's on the screen. recommend, nothing else on the market is a true competitor with this feature set. Just don't expect amazing HDR, it doesn't do local dimming (but only OLED or miniLED can offer meaningful local dimming anyway, the former being unsuitable for desktop use due to burn-in and the latter being too expensive and immature in the technology that should be feasible at the moment)
ο»Ώ
HP 24Uh 24" Backlit Monitor 1920x1080p, 60Hz, LCD with HD Resolution - K5A38AA#ABA
101 Review
Dell SE2416HX Screen LED Lit Monitor 23.8", 1920X1080P, HDMI
93 Review
LG 27MP59G-P 27 inch Monitor with FreeSync, 75Hz Refresh Rate, and 1080p HD Resolution
93 Review
Samsung Flat Monitor Super Slim Design 27", 1920X1080P, 75Hz, Flicker Free
112 Review