
As I was seated on the D7100, I had three copies of this glass in my possession. Only one of the three was uniformly sharp, while the other two had issues with their angles and their AF. The secondary market price of this glass is unquestionably justified by its quality. However, there is another great glass called the 55-300VR that outperforms it in every way. It has beautiful bokeh for low-light zoom and stunning color reproduction. Those who claim that a 55-200mm lens can produce superb portraits are not engaging in the amateurish folly of a beginning photographer who initially invested in a digital single lens reflex camera (DSLR) equipped with a double whale. To get started, give your wretched crop bodies a typical full-frame telephoto lens and examine the difference in the resulting image quality. The bokeh produced by the mediocre 55-200 lens is a far cry from that produced by the legendary 70-200 lens. Even with super-zooms such as the 18-300VR, the picture quality and bokeh are noticeably more expensive, beautiful, and plastic.

Nikon 35mm f/1.8G Auto Focus Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras - Black (Model 2183)
125 Review

Canon EOS SLR Camera Lens EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM
124 Review

Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002
78 Review

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Fixed Lens - Discontinued by Manufacturer
93 Review