Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Jnis Bukovskis ᠌ photo
1 Level
327 Review
0 Karma

Review on Razer Lancehead Tournament Edition Gaming Mouse, black by Jnis Bukovskis ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

I wasn't thrilled with the product, but it can be used.

The mouse itself is of good quality and looks good. But appearance is far from the main criterion for evaluating the quality of a gaming mouse. Omitting the oddities of the software necessary for detailed configuration of this device (and there are enough of them), I will only repeat the point of view that has already been expressed more than once: rather than doing “xs what for everyone at once” - it’s better, after all, to make excellent HC, separately for right-handers and separately for lefties. In this case, we have a very strange alignment: excellent components - and, in essence, no result. This is, if we're being serious. From a technical point of view mouse is awesome. From technical - but not user. Obviously, the designer did not quite understand what he was doing. Or he performed a task that was not directly related to the interests of the end user - to put it mildly. As if on "pianists" everything is tested. But "pianists" are a minority, if you think about it. Too bad they don't think about it. The palms and general motor skills of all people, of course, are different. But I don’t even want to delve into such a “beauty” of execution, when the pressure on the main button does not occur “from top to bottom”, but somehow “from northwest to southeast diagonally” (for right-handers). There, at the end of this button (both i. E.), in fact, there is simply no flat part (!) - not to mention the "bulges" inherent in the absolute majority of sane mice. A good mouse itself "holds" the fingers - and not vice versa. Here, with each press, the joints of the index finger are forced (and completely unjustified) to experience lateral loads - nonsense . The joints of the little finger are similarly tensed; so that the latter begins to "go numb" after a couple of hours of work / play. In order to more or less tolerably control this mouse and the process (with an active game, for example, in some kind of Action) - you will always be like "dragging" it, and it will "run away". I have small palms - but the G403, having even larger dimensions, "sat down", almost like a "poured". And: you don’t have to look for side buttons on it - they are always under your fingers. And clicking on them (which is especially important) is confident. You should definitely try Razer.

Pros
  • Excellent quality of materials and assembly. Very good support material: mouse sliding on the carpet is "soft", smooth, without jerks. The best glide I've ever experienced. (Carpet - Razer Manticor). And the cord is the best, definitely. Especially if there is a holder.
Cons
  • Only one drawback - the mouse is inconvenient, because: a) by "tenacity" - dragging her little finger is boring; rubber on the sides will not save; b) by the way all, without exception, the buttons are executed - this is crap. It especially concerns the main (No. 1) and the far side, i. E. No. 5. The latter is normal just not to press - it is too recessed, and the clicks are tactilely poorly expressed. The same with the main 2 buttons, and this claim is clearly not to the "stuffing" - to the case. + defective internal memory: remembers only the sensitivity settings of the sensor, and only the involved software manages the color. Which, by the way, is, to put it mildly, unfinished. Just something. ++ This very software is very peculiar - it requires mandatory (!) Registration through a personal P / Z and access to the network for installation and initial configuration. And, after each launch of the OS, tediously starting and climbing into the tray, without any possibility to turn this thing off.

Comments (1)

Пожалуйста, войдите, чтобы написать комментарий
June 21, 2023
Has pros: Very comfortable, I immediately got used to it Has cons: they just don't exist