Review on Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED IF AF-S VR Nikkor Zoom Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras with Enhanced SEO by Michal Wojcik ᠌

For me, the lens is nothing more than an additional perk that comes at no additional cost (I purchased mine for 14 dollars out of my own hands). The winner will be determined by which one has a bigger price tag. Therefore, it is an excellent choice for going on excursions, going on walks, going on photo hunts, and generally taking images outside. The fact that it is darker indoors makes it considerably more difficult to clean up, and the minimum focusing distance that is necessary is 1.5 meters. This makes it much more difficult to clean up. Take it, you won't regret it. accompanied by each and every one of its advantages. + razor-sharp + lightning-fast (it used to be 55-300, but now it's a crawl compared to 70-300) + convenient, wide zoom ring + real telephoto ("honest" 300 mm at close range, in contrast to the same 28-300, in which a focal length of 300 mm from one and a half meters really equals only 150 mm) + decent VR (once again, 28-300 holds weaker, the image "staggers" a lot) + small filter diameter (larger diameter - more price for the filter) + adjusting the focus using a ring for greater precision ( Although it has have certain downsides, such as being bulky and overall, they are to be expected from a telephoto lens because of its longer focal length. Altering the focus length is not exactly the easiest thing to do because the zoom ring is hidden when the hood is in the transit position. This makes it less convenient than it may otherwise be. a little bit dim, but for that sort of money, there is no way you could reasonably get a 70-200/2.8 lens, which has an MDF (minimum focusing distance) of as much as 1.5 meters.