Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED IF AF-S VR Nikkor Zoom Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras with Enhanced SEO Review

For a long time I chose a telephoto up to 50 and on samples chose this one. At that time, Eshny, who came to replace this one, was just released and decided to take a cheaper and proven model - he never regretted it, but was even delighted that the telephoto was so tenacious and sharp from the hands. All photos below are taken by hand, about 6 meters from the object. Now, of course, it’s better to take Eshny, or even better to save up and take 200-500 f5.6 for 100t. R. Now I continue to click…

An outstanding lens for a price that is reasonable (I purchased a new one for 16,300). It is somewhat dim, and you will need to use a flash indoors; there are no back-front tricks possible. Even though it's heavy, I recommend having 300mm (on the crop).

Has pros: Excellent quality at a low price, excellent drawing, lightweight, VR. Cons below: Sometimes all the same, when wearing, the trunk crawls out under the weight.

Got pros: Picture, sharpness, focusing speed, stabilizer operation - everything is beyond praise Cons below: Price I don’t write about aperture ratio, a different aperture ratio there would be other dimensions and price, take a look at the same 70-200 / 2.8)

Pros: Very sharp picture, natural colors, the stub works great, high-quality embly, metal mount Has some cons: A little heavy, like a piston dust into the chamber, there are probably no more flaws

An excellent lens for adequate money (I took a new one for 16300) it’s a bit dark and you need a flash indoors, no back-front tricks, It's heavy, but 300mm (on the crop) I RECOMMEND.

In general, I wanted to take 70-200 2.8, but the toad strangled me to give 70k, so I took it for 20.500 and am happy as an elephant, pictures from it http://fotki. page=0 Some pros: If the weather is clear and the sun is shining, then this toy works wonders, the stabilizer draws a lot but not all) Do not laugh! stabilizer is nothing like that, everything is very decent and standard Has some cons: "For such a price they are not available" of course it is dark and VERY large, it attracts equally

Got pros: Sharpness, clarity, fast focusing, at times Has some cons: Inconvenient manual focus ring, sometimes there is not enough aperture.

Bought on 02/18/2022 Works great, no complaints \\\\\\ pictures taken with this lens can be viewed here: http://fotki. (pages 3 and 4 of the album)

This lens can deservedly be called the best reporter in the world in the 70-300 the pros of the whole world do not disdain and choose it if there is no money for 70-200 2.8 or 70-200 F4 or when it is inconvenient to carry something expensive, heavy, is nonsense - learn to use the camera and close the hole from 8 to 11 is not applicable to this product, I found rather weak angles up to F10, but the picture became less dry as on the D7100 crop, the 70-300VR works just flawlessly,

For me, the lens is nothing more than an additional perk that comes at no additional cost (I purchased mine for 14 dollars out of my own hands). The winner will be determined by which one has a bigger price tag. Therefore, it is an excellent choice for going on excursions, going on walks, going on photo hunts, and generally taking images outside. The fact that it is darker indoors makes it considerably more difficult to clean up, and the minimum focusing distance that is necessary is 1.5…

In addition to the kit 18-105mm VR lens, a portrait fix 50mm f/1.8 lens was also purchased. When weighed against the whale, heaven and earth. The pace of focusing is much accelerated, and most importantly, it is more accurate! It seems as though the lens itself is what captures the subject that I am aiming for. This is, of course, a joke; yet, in order to alter the focus point, I only only slightly divert the "sight," and it immediately adheres to whatever it is I want it to focus on. The fact

Different pros: Value for money, good stub. at a distance of about 500 m. in good weather, excellent shots are obtained, ideal for wildlife photography. Its cons: Of course, a fat minus is aperture, dark. But miracles do not happen for such a price. Closer than 1.5 m does not focus.

The lens, both in terms of its dimensions and its weight, exceeds the parameters for acceptable portability when traveling. Naturally, he is not as tall as his more brilliant offspring, but he is in excellent physical condition anyway. It draws very well up to 200 when the weather is nice or the lighting is low, but it starts to draw less well after 250 and doesn't always draw up to 300. However, it can still soap up to 300. You can get acclimated to shooting with the FR 70 (on a full-frame…

After using 18-105 for a while, I decided to treat myself and purchased it. I noticed a significant improvement right away. The lens has better color reproduction, and the picture is now much crisper. With a separate note, I'd like to comment on how quickly this lens can focus—so it's quick that it's almost frightening! Ultimately, we were able to appreciate the tracking focus mode, and even while using the conventional focus mode, the lens focused very swiftly and almost never missed its…

A lens that deserves serious consideration for use in photography or long-range shooting. It is in your best interest to acquire. These are some advantages: Great speed of focusing; nevertheless, despite the fact that many people claim that its focusing speed is many times faster than that of an 18-105 whale, I didn't detect any difference; perhaps I just received a whale that was really agile. But the unwavering ability to concentrate comes out on top. The assumption here is that aperture will

I needed a lens that would work well for photographing birds and animals in their natural environments, so I purchased this one. Prior to it, I had been making use of the Nikkor 55-300 for close to a year. Made the switch to the Nikkor 70-300 because of its quicker autofocus. The lens is to one's liking! Excellent design, good speed and accuracy in focusing, and an iron stabilizer. Continuous manual focus control helps a lot! You are able to make adjustments to the focus at any time, and by…

Specifically designed telezoom for use in operational shooting outside (300 mm really help). The option that offers the most value for your money is the following: Tamron is cheaper by 1000 and also provides more pronounced chromaticity, while Sigma offers a lower price but has more noticeable chromate and fringes. These are some advantages: The major benefits of this lens are its extremely quick autofocus speed and its accuracy; because to these features, it is simple to seize the moment…

Definitely a successful model. In its price segment, perhaps, there is nothing better. I got it in excellent condition for 11t. R. And it's worth every penny. Recently, I don’t even take it off the carcass. For lovers of bird photography, this lens is in the "must buy" category. Different pros: + sharpness + great stub + well and quickly catches focus, even in poor lighting + on crop it turns into 105-450 + nice drawing + petal hood included + the lens diameter is the same as on 18-105…

A very worthy lens for photography or shooting from a long distance. I advise you to buy. Has pros: Excellent focusing speed, although many say that focusing is many times faster than that of an 18-105 whale, I didn’t notice, maybe I just got a super-nimble whale. But the tenacity of focus is on top. Aperture is basically expected. The build looks solid. The metal mount inspires confidence and hope that it will withstand its solid 745 grams and solid size without any problems. The problem with…