I put it on the D5000. The result exceeded all my expectations. Very sharp. Good color reproduction. But you can shoot only in good lighting. On a sunny day, it gives amazing results. good health! Has some pros Price for such focal lengths. Very sharp up to 270 mm. Pattern, color reproduction at a height. Convenient and small for traveling. 105-450 mm comes out on crop. The stabilizer works wonders on telephoto. Has cons: A slight backlash on an elongated trunk (I chose from all the specimens).

For my money, the lens is just a gift (I took mine for 14 from my hands). Which is better costs more. So for travel, walks, photo hunting (generally shooting outdoors), it is completely suitable. It’s worse indoors, because it’s dark, and even with 1,5 minimum focusing distance you can’t clear up. Take it, you won't regret it. With its pros. + sharp + fast (before it was 55-300, now it’s a brake compared to 70-300) + convenient, wide zoom ring + real telephoto ("honest" 300 mm at close…

I was satisfied with the lens. I got a staff member. And lately I have been working only with her. Its pros: 1. Focusing speed - it is really very decent, compared to the same whale 18-105 2. Stub - and so that they don’t write there, but it really helps. And to make sure of this, try to shoot any scene at 300mm without a stub, and even on a crop with a shutter speed longer than 1/450 from your hands. (with 1/100-1/160 stub). 4. Not cropped glass. Suitable for FF. 5. The versatility of this…

Specialized telezoom for operational outdoor shooting (300 mm really help). For your money, the best option: Sigma is much cheaper but pronouncedly chromate and fringes, Tamron is cheaper by 1000 and also gives more pronounced chromaticity. Pros below: Extremely fast autofocus speed and accuracy are the main advantages of this lens - it is easy to capture the moment with it, especially in street reportage shooting. On large FRs, there is a beautiful and smooth blurring of the background…

I bought at first 55-300 according to the seller's convincing story, although I looked at 70-300, in the evening it turned out that 55-300 was a complete, soapy crap, without sleeping half the night in the morning I changed this bucket (55-300) from the "convincing" seller, on a Mercedes - 70-300 . which I am very happy about Has some pros 100% work off their money. sharp, contrast, focus, two stub modes. With its cons. a small backlash of 300 mm (all lenses have 70-300), there is no trunk…

This lens is one of the few lenses that "hit the top ten". Picture quality and sharpness are excellent. The stub helps a lot in the rooms. I believe that this lens must be purchased one of the first. As another worthy option, the Nikkor 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR offers great performance at a low price. All in all, buy it and you won't regret it. Different pros: Excellent quality at a low price, excellent drawing, lightweight, VR. Cons: Sometimes all the same, when wearing, the trunk crawls out…

a lens for specific tasks - birds, sports, household photo espionage) it is sharp, pleasant and well made. Of course, you can shoot portraits and bugs, but why? if you already bought a camera with a lens and you understand that it is no longer enough, buy a telephoto lens for a non-full-frame camera - it will have a more acceptable range. Has pros: the second generation of the stabilizer is a plus for a telephoto! price quality good picture for that money AF-it's nice that you can think…

The lens is a bit dark, but for such a price you should not expect something else, whoever doesn’t like it - let them buy 70-200. If you do not twist it all the way, the pictures are very sharp. In principle, you don’t need to twist up to 300, evaporation from the ground and other air distortions at a great distance will still spoil the frame and the lens will not save. If you just need to look at the bird for yourself, this is not critical of course. It is also treated by closing the…

In the first moments, I was impressed with my picture and of course with focal lengths, after the whale 18-55 VR. Then I paid attention to the noise emitted by the stabilizer, it strained me, I thought it was a marriage (pay attention to this feature when buying !), but after talking with the owners of this model, I calmed my soul (but I don’t lose my vigilance :), then I was pleased with the work of the stabilizer, works super. A picture with good colors, clear, but up to 260-270 mm further…

Fellow amateur photographers, I am writing a review only to thank this lens for a long conscientious service, please do not rate the usefulness of this review, because. I don’t set a goal to describe the lens, everything has already been said before me, I just say thank you to him! He helped me out many times, especially at the stadium, especially in Luzhniki in the stands outside the goal (whoever was, he will understand), the moments of the game at the opposite goal looked perfectly through…

I bought this lens specifically for shooting wild animals and birds during trips to nature. Before that, I used Nikkor 55-300 for almost a year. Switched to Nikkor 70-300 due to faster autofocus. The lens pleases! Fast and accurate focusing, iron stabilizer, excellent design. Constant manual focus control helps a lot! At any time, it is possible to correct the focus, and you can use the lens as a spyglass by rotating the ring manually, saving battery power. Thread diameter for filter - 67mm…

I have been using glass for over 3 years. Satisfied with everything, the main plus is the price, I took it for birds, animals and reporting, it fully justified itself. Don't mind getting dirty, light enough, perfectly assembled. I chose between 70-200 tamrons and sigmas, but decided not to change Nikano because I had a bad experience of friendship with sigma and the tamron decided not to risk it and take the original.

At first, I didn't shoot at all with the camera. like the picture. with a telephoto lens, new horizons of photography open up. The lens is large and heavy. In conjunction with the D300s, almost seven hundred kilos! Sometimes AF is smeared at the long end in difficult conditions (the object is against a highly contrasting background, insufficient lighting conditions). There is not much loss of sharpness at f/5.6 at the long end. It is solved by covering the diaphragm. Likes a lot of light. Good…

If you work more during the day, if you are not in a hurry when shooting, if you have a d750 that will pull it out in the dark, if it is longer than 200 try not to twist it and if they offer a used one for a great price in good condition - a must have! If you shoot in harsh conditions in which only 70-200 can handle what the hell are you doing here? :) From previous comments: "compared with the Canon L-series" Neighing from the heart. Compare home telescope with Hubble even in this case :)

The lens, in terms of its size and weight, is at the limit of travel portability. He is smaller of course than his brighter ones to gather, but still very healthy. In good weather or in dim lighting, it draws very well up to 200, a little worse from 250 and not always, but still soaps up to 300. You can get used to the FR 70 (on a full-frame camera !) on the street and only carry it for street shooting. For a selfie, of course, it will not be very good, but a selfie with a SLR camera and…

An excellent lens for adequate money (I took a new one for 16300). Yes, it’s a bit dark and you need a flash indoors, but fast apertures are many times more expensive. Very sharp, no back-front tricks, excellent pattern and color reproduction. Portraits are excellent. It's heavy, but 300mm (on the crop) - shoot and no one pays attention to you. Conclusion - it is worth every spent, I RECOMMEND.

I got it for myself after using 18-105 and immediately felt the difference. The picture is clearer, the lens has excellent color reproduction. Separately, I would like to note the focusing speed of this lens, which is simply lightning fast! Finally, we managed to appreciate the tracking focus mode, and even in the normal focus mode, the lens focuses very quickly and practically does not miss. Another pleasant surprise was the stabilizer, which works flawlessly. When you take pictures in program

Great lens! auto focus and stabilizer is just some kind of MIRACLE ! the stub really holds 4 steps, auto focus, even in low light, just "bites" into the dead! And the charm of the FR 300 can only be understood by trying it, and if you have a cropped matrix, then you get just a super zoom with a FR of 105-450 ! I use it in tandem with the Nikon D90 kit 18-105 and 70-300 cover all the necessary focal lengths. I recommend this lens, you will not regret the money spent !

I won’t write about darkness, I knew what I was doing. You can't buy a 2.8 for this money. I immediately bought a vertical handle, otherwise it outweighs. I didn't want to let go. I put it on and went outside, what can I say KIT 18-105 I don’t want to put it back. Finally I understood what pixel sharpness is. The same object was filmed on 70 KIT and this. This is earth and sky. KIT in the furnace. I will think about how to close the near ranges.

A good lens that gives a decent picture can be used in some cases as a good portrait lens. Two stabilization modes, you can shoot while driving in an active mode, or, for example, shoot with panning in normal mode. The movable zoom system is very clearly adjusted, there is no backlash, and even more so self-zoom when tilted, like the nikkor 18-200) When shooting birds, the focus-limiting function would not hurt, like on the nikkor 70-200 2.8 the nearest object (branch) and while focusing on the