Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Boyan Lalov ᠌ photo
1 Level
260 Review
0 Karma

Review on Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Telephoto Zoom Lens: Ultimate Performance for Canon SLR Cameras by Boyan Lalov ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best price for such a product, I will buy more!

Nikon 70-300VR, Nikon 55-200VR, Tamron 18-270VR, Canon 55-250IS, Canon 70-200 4L, and Sigma 150-500 were among the telezoom lenses previously utilized. There are currently no backlashes on 4 carcasses (40d, 50d, 7d, and 5), which is version 2.8. I even covered a very sharp 70-200 4l sometimes up to 5.6 for sharpness, and even at 5, the portraits do not look like they were shot on a macro lens, everything is sharp. I'm not happy with the noise of the stub when turning it on and off, but it' in my opinion, Aperture. 2.8 is a significant improvement from 4; however this is also crucial, In good weather, the 70-200 4L seemed to be a nice choice for portraiture, but at 2.8, the blur is completely different, and I can photograph indoors with the 60 now that I can't with the 70-300 (which, by the way, is a fantastic lens for the money). If you have the chance to drink this glass, do so since you won't be disappointed, according to pro. 70-200 4:)

Pros
  • 1) Protection against moisture and dust.
Cons
  • following sigma 150–500, Fixes are supposedly preferable, but I personally prefer 70-200 to a set of 85 1.2 and 135 2. Well, I was worried that the 70-200 2.8 would have the same technical frame as the 70-200, but no,