Yes, fotik-for-fifty kopecks already inspires some hope . However, the picture quality is very little superior to the ancient Canon EOS 400d, which served faithfully for 5 years . What for did you sell, you ask? . Loshara.) Goodbye night shooting. Exposures longer than 2-3 seconds should not be used, because a few extra red and blue "stars" will appear - hot areas about 5-6 by 10-12 pixels in size. I have 7 such colored ovals. You can do a REMAP at a service center, but then these pixels will contain information from neighboring ones . Can you imagine if the modelβs eye is in this place?)) The noise is objectively higher than at 400-ke with those same values, high density of elements with all the consequences . In short, opium for no one, if anyone is thinking about buying this camera - change your mind, better take 600-ku or 60-ku, the picture quality will be the same, or wait for 5d mark III. I've been waiting for him for six months.(
Camera Canon PowerShot SX120 IS
76 Review
Revamped Sony Alpha a6000 Mirrorless Digital Camera: 24.3MP SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD and Power Zoom Lens
103 Review
Canon PowerShot A480 camera, black
108 Review
Nikon D3100 DSLR Camera with Auto Focus-S Nikkor Zoom Lens (Discontinued by Manufacturer)
109 Review