Review on 🔌 UPTab DisplayPort 1.4 to HDMI 2.1 Active Adapter with HDR Support - Experience 4k 120Hz or 8K 60Hz with HDR on PC or Tablet via HDMI Enabled Monitor, TV, or Projector by Stetson Olsen

Excellent product, plug and play for my setup and 4K resolution as standard, no custom configuration needed. I bought an active DisplayPort 1.2 to HDMI 2.0a adapter to see if it would work better than the old passive DisplayPort to HDMI adapter I had on hand with a recently purchased 50" flat panel display . While I was able to display a resolution of 3840 x 2160 with the passive DP to HDMI adapter, I had to create my own resolution for the NVIDIA GPU. After every reboot, and often after unlocking the splash screen, the combination of custom settings and a passive adapter disables the 4K monitor and reverts to the base 1920 x 1080 resolution, requiring multiple steps to re-enable the 4K monitor "A 4K -Monitor with the same DP 1.2 port did not cause the same problems. To satisfy my curiosity I bought an Uptab adapter expecting the results to be the same as with the passive adapter. I first tested the Uptab DisplayPort 1.2 to HDMI 2.0a active adapter with a 40" Seiki SM40UMP that I used with a single DP 1.2 connection at 4K resolution, replacing the DP 1.2 cable with an adapter cable and replaced a Redmere 18+ Gbps HDMI cable. As expected, Seiki immediately switched to HDMI and returned to displaying 4K at 30Hz. was pleasantly surprised when the calculator immediately recognized a 50 inch monitor with a resolution of 3840x2160 without the need for a special resolution setting. Even more surprisingly, the Uptab DisplayPort 1.2 to HDMI 2.0a active adapter delivered an undocumented *second* resolution of 4K 4096 x 2160 @ 24Hz on a 50" monitor panel! works without problems --- an Easter egg on the monitor! Regardless, I've reverted to 3840 x 2160 to continue testing configuration stability over the next few days. Added a variable with 4096 x 2160 and if I run into instability issues again I'll leave it wondering if the root cause was the adapter/monitor combo or the 4096/adapter/monitor combo. My configuration: Dell Latitude E6520 i7-2720HQM with Intel HD 3000 IGU** NVIDIA NVS 4200M GPU with 512MB dedicated VRAM** Samsung 1TB 850 EVO SSD, 2TB Seagate ST2000LM00716GB DDR3 1866MHz, Dell Dockingstation PR02X E-Port II Plus (with 2 DisplayPort/DVI-D ports) - Screenshots included * My current computer configuration does not support 4K@60Hz via a single DP 1.2 port, so I cannot test the full capabilities of the HDMI 2.0a 60Hz adapter. Absolutely right --- and I was planning to buy two 27" 2560x1440 monitors to replace two 27" 1920x1200 monitors that failed after 8 years of continuous use based on documentation from Dell and Intel. I already had a 50" monitor and decided to see how it would look at 2560 x 1440, leading to the discovery that the E6520 + dock combo would deliver 4K from a single DP port. Just as Dell's documentation says the E6520 can only support 8GB of 1333MHz RAM, it's a known fact that Dell routinely underestimates the full capacity of the onboard chipset. I'm using 16GB of 1866MHz DDR3 RAM (2x8GB DDR3 SODIMM), no problem since mid 2013 and I've been price tracking 32GB 1600MHz DDR3 SODIMM (2 x 16GB DDR3 SODIMM) kits over the past year to see if I can access the full performance of the Intel chipset in a laptop can.