Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Ada Fedorowicz ᠌ photo
1 Level
163 Review
0 Karma

Review on Nikon AF-S FX NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Zoom Lens: Ultimate Auto Focus for Nikon DSLR Cameras by Ada Fedorowicz ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Good product for me, no problems at all.

I feel a wide range of nuanced feelings when I sit down to write about this viewpoint. On the one hand, it was he who assisted me in elevating the beauty and caliber of my work. But on the other hand. I almost experienced a sense of dissatisfaction as I fitted it onto the full-frame D600 after unscrewing it from the cropped D7000. Because it was a wonderful all-purpose portrait lens with a 35-105 equivalent focal range before that (when it was used with the D7000). (Cropping the image makes it appear closer). At this point, I've moved it to the "event" and "full-length portrait" categories. I'll say this for those who think that f/50 can be used to take a standard portrait: the closer the camera is to the subject's face, the harder it is for them to relax. Even now, the only lens I can use to take a timeless photograph is the tried-and-true 28-300. Yet, I don't stop staring at the Nikon 135mm f/ 2D AF or give up hope. It's important to note that this lens produces beautiful pictures of the outdoors and is excellent for shooting high-definition DSLR video clips on Full Frame. The only adjustment needed is getting used to the lens' relatively brief sharpening stroke. Despite my best efforts and thorough inspections, I was unable to find the nano-coating. The front lens develops dust much like other lenses do. My friend accidentally scratched the lens while putting the light filter on in a hurry, despite the rumored layer of increased toughness. Hence, this is the only accessible version that has an anti-reflective coating:)) A lens that qualifies as "extremely necessary," to put it simply. Everything I said about him there is related to the fact that, back when I was using the D7000 to photograph weddings, I had a perfect plan. I only switched lenses between me and the table twice throughout the entire wedding day because we shot a report at 18-200, set at 24-70. You will constantly have to tug them back and forth, which is not good for the camera or the optics because it usually happens in a hurry or in the harsh environment of a battlefield. I am generally satisfied with the lens and would suggest it to others. In the not-too-distant future, either they will introduce the 16-400mm f/1.8G VRIII zoom lens, or I will devise a creative method of photographing weddings:):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):) Sincerely.

Pros
  • - Huge and Lightweight:)) Excellent bokeh (background blur) - Strong thanks to the iron content - If used correctly, it can replace a lot of repairs. - Superb geometry (distortion is almost invisible) - Price (it has fallen significantly over the past three years) - Strongly advised for studio, commercial, wedding, and nature photographers
Cons
  • - longer than the zoom 28-300, lathers the frame's corners at aperture 2,8. (with the new carcass D600 does not fit into the old wardrobe trunk) - lacks a VR stabilizer (for reporting on the run, this is very critical) - I find it difficult to adjust to the fact that, unlike previous lenses, the first ring now controls focusing while the second controls zoom. - I believed that the sharpening ring's stroke was too short for physical labor (for example, for video recording). - It would be ideal if he could use the same hole to add a focal length of at least 85. If it occurred, he wouldn't be required to make any payments at all:))