To the parents who are considering purchasing this phone for their child: please do not make the same mistake I did. I made the decision to purchase a device that can function as both a "dialer" and a messenger for a student who is currently enrolled in junior high school after reading some reviews. Lightweight, very small, and very affordable. Did not anticipate anything particularly remarkable, but had the following goals in mind: 1. Place a cover over it and a protective screen in front of it because once children get their hands on something, everything starts "burning." In the end, it does not really matter if the device fails entirely because it is so cheap to replace. 2. I was interested in putting in place a reputable anti-spam program (from a well-known company). From my previous experiences, even if a child does not call anyone from a new number other than their parents, con artists from abandoned numbers will start calling the child very quickly, which will frighten the child. 3. I was planning on installing a program that would prevent access to the internet as well as some new applications (from the same well-known company). In order to shield the child from unwelcome information and "toys" that interfere with his or her capacity to learn. I was unable to perform ANY of the aforementioned actions on this "device." 1. After the protective screen was installed, the phone almost completely stopped responding to the user's touches. It became an extremely challenging task to do something as simple as choose an item from the menu. 2. While I was installing important programs for me, the phone displayed a message saying that "in order to save battery power," it cannot grant these applications permission to work with pop-up windows. As a result, I was unable to launch the programs after they had been installed. Obviously, the intention behind this limitation is not to preserve the life of the battery in my phone. In the end, why do I even need this charge if I can't install the applications that are essential to my work? This is a man-made restriction placed on the capabilities of a low-cost device. Naturally, Samsung is within its legal rights to act in this manner. But why don't merchants or Samsung provide a warning about this feature before the purchase? Following the events of this story, the credibility of the brand has taken a nosedive.
💎 Renewed Samsung Galaxy S8 64GB Coral Blue Fully Unlocked Phone
383 Review
Unlocked Apple iPhone 7, 📱 32GB, Black (Refurbished) - Enhanced for SEO
318 Review
Renewed Samsung Galaxy A50 Verizon Smartphone in Black with 64GB Storage
569 Review
📱 Huawei P40 Lite JNY-LX1 International Version - 128GB Crush Green, Dual 4G and 6GB RAM
297 Review
2 Pack EN-EL19 Battery & Rapid USB Charger For Nikon Coolpix S32-S7000 Cameras - OAproda
41 Review
Keyboard Cover For HP Pavilion X360 14 14-Dk 14M-Dh 14-Dq/Dh 14-Fq 14-Ce/Cf 14T-Dh200 14-Dq0070Nr 14-Fq1025Nr 14-Dq0011Dx/Dq0004Dx/Dq0002 14-Dh2011Nr Fq1097Nr 14T-Dq300 14Z-Fq000 14-Cb185Nr, GPink
39 Review
NinjaBatt High Performance Battery For Toshiba A665 And L755 Series - 6 Cells/4400MAh/48Wh
40 Review
F FORITO 2-Pack Anti Glare Screen Protectors For 2022 MacBook Air 13.6" With M2 Chip - Protect Your Device From Scratches And Fingerprints
33 Review