Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Adam Walendzik ᠌ photo
1 Level
357 Review
0 Karma

Review on Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Telephoto Zoom Lens: Ultimate Performance for Canon SLR Cameras by Adam Walendzik ᠌

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Return my money! Disgusting product and poor quality.

If anyone is interested, I can send identical images of the target taken with this; nevertheless, I can't bring myself to state that the 24-70II and the 5D-4 and 5D-3, both in use and in retirement, operate without a hitch. To avoid encountering a repeat situation, run with Canon without looking back. The third version was launched with little changes, and the stub was reduced to 3.5. What does that indicate, in your opinion, and what will I say? A significant flaw in the design that was concealed was fixed, and it was only covered up cosmetically.

Pros
  • After three years of not filming, the quality is gone, and the peripherals are horribly lathering.
Cons
  • The periphery is generally cloudy like a monocle, but not to such an extent. However, there was no one to repair in Hong Kong; in Hong Kong, a lens block was replaced for under 60,000, plus shipping and insurance. There is another version that the lens has not returned to the stub.