So I thought and guessed and kept looking at markIV, but the difference was too big. I decided that the difference would go better on the glass. Got pros: The functionality is decent, after my 40d, 50D, 5DmakII I like almost everything here. The ability to control from your phone and take photos remotely is just super. Ergonomics are familiar and you adapt instantly. In terms of signal / noise, it is a head and shoulders above my predecessors, and in conjunction with 50mm L 1.2, you can take it off your hands at night in the city. The presence of a rotary display was not critical for me, but it simplified a lot of things (I remembered my Panasonic DMC FZ-50 ultra-zoom and my first Canon A80 digital camera). The battery is excellent and the resource for personnel with a margin, I tested it in the winter in the forest and the charge did not seem to sink. With its cons. 1 \ 4000 is even not very . I hope it won’t become a problem on a summer afternoon, although I like open apertures. Uneven coverage with AF points - everything is in the central 3/4 part, sometimes it really infuriates. After the previous Canons, the CompactFlash mountain, damn it, where are they now? I had to buy another SD (of course, the price is a chip, but that's it).
Nikon D3100 DSLR Camera Body (Kit Box) - No Lens Included, International Version with No Warranty
298 Review
Nikon COOLPIX L810 Digital Camera: 16.1MP, 26x Zoom, NIKKOR ED Glass Lens, 3-inch LCD (Blue)
95 Review
Discontinued Canon EOS 7D Digital SLR 📷 Camera Body Only with 18 MP CMOS Sensor
88 Review
Canon PowerShot A480 camera, black
108 Review