Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
acdelco 12580828 original equipment tensioner logo

ACDelco 12580828 Original Equipment Tensioner Review

3

·

Average

Revainrating 3.5 out of 5  
Rating 
3.6
🔧 Car Belts, Hoses & Pulleys, 🏎️ Performance Car Parts & Accessories

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(2)
img 1 attached to ACDelco 12580828 Original Equipment Tensioner
img 2 attached to ACDelco 12580828 Original Equipment Tensioner

Description of ACDelco 12580828 Original Equipment Tensioner

Helps keep drive belt at correct tension to help maintain proper function. GM-recommended replacement part for your GM vehicle’s original factory component. Offering the quality, reliability, and durability of GM OE. Manufactured to GM OE specification for fit, form, and function.

Reviews

Global ratings 3
  • 5
    0
  • 4
    2
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A Reliable Tensioner for Your Car Belts

We recently replaced the tensioner in our car and opted for this product. Based on our own experience, we can confidently say that it's a reliable choice that holds up well over time. The installation process WAS straightforward and the tensioner has since worked flawlessly, keeping our car belts in check..

Pros
  • The ACDelco tensioner is durable, easy to install, and effectively keeps belts in place.
Cons
  • We haven't encountered any drawbacks with this tensioner so far.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Cheap Tensioner: Not Worth the Hassle

Thanks to my knowledge gained in practice, I would not recommend this tensioner. Although the price is enticing, the quality is not up to par. The tensioner quickly began to rattle and caused issues with my car`s belts leading to added EXPENSES and frustration. .

Pros
  • Affordable
Cons
  • Poor quality, caused additional problems.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Works perfectly! - Engines and Engine Parts

Perfect for my 2001 Chevy Suburban. The inner bolt is difficult to reach, but that's a Chevy design issue. Works perfectly!

Pros
  • Replacement Parts
Cons
  • Some Trouble