Pros
- The light sensitivity of new lenses on RF, focusing in the entire range of the frame, the viewfinder is just what you need, what you see is what comes out, customization
Cons
- I'm not picky, what I expected is what I got
Pros
- The camera is made according to all the laws of a modern gadget. It's nice to hold it in your hands. But, no more. The price is lower than conditional competitors.
Cons
- 1. Lower dynamic range than major competitors. 2. No matrix stabilization. 3. Image detailing is lower due to the smoothing filter, and therefore, the thesis that "no one takes landscapes on canon" is still relevant. 4. The closed system for installing manual lenses. There are adapters, but as usual, everything is buggy. 5. One card slot, and this immediately sweeps aside any possibility of using the camera for serious work, even as a spare. 6. Marketing games with lenses. More on this in the comment.
Pros
- Good ergonomics, swivel touch screen, normal digital viewfinder, excellent focusing system, excellent compatibility with EF lenses, color reproduction. Good shooting mode in CR3 (compressed RAW). Protection of the sensor from the external environment when the lens is removed (curtains). Gorgeous ultra quality lenses (at the same ultra price).
Cons
- Dynamic range, noise at ISO over 6400, requires customization (reassignment and general assignment) of control buttons. Thick adapter for EF. No matrix stabilization. I don’t even need it, but Canon’s marketers were infuriated, saying that lens stabilization is enough. Are you seriously? There are almost no fast lenses with a stub from Canon, except for 35mm, 85mm and 200mm - the rest are at least 2,8 Karl! And a week after this announcement, Canon registers a patent for matrix stabilization. The price is at least $150 too high.
Pros
- Focusing is something, especially on firmware 1.4 - it immediately sees a face, and almost always finds an eye, if it’s tall, it’s always half-height and a portrait - it’s a feeling that the future has come, you don’t have to pull the camera all the time - focusing - framing - focusing and so without end, just framing and that's it. This is a bomb. Everything else without enthusiasm but very good - Matrix from 5d4 - good, New rav cs3 - got better. An electronic video finder is convenient, by the way, it shows a picture better than on the main screen. Swivel screen - of course convenient and necessary. Lighter in weight - of course + Assistance with focusing infrared assistant - needed. Silent shooting - top when shooting in theaters and churches. No more adjustments are needed - hallelujah, for so many years I have been so tormented with these, but here you can simply forget about it. Adapters with various useful gadgets - of course ++ (but a little expensive) You can charge from a power bank - well, not big + but still They say the jeep has become better - never tried it. The theme itself with no specularity, well, with an adapter, the same lenses at the same speed.
Cons
- Of course, there is also here, but with all the shortcomings, EOS R is a discovery for me - but nevertheless I will list it. Ergonomics - a level lower than 5D4, the joystick was clamped, the touch panel is rubbish, you constantly have to switch the viewfinder, then to simulate the exposure - it's convenient when working without a flash and when you work in a studio, in live view, and when a flash is put on with an imitation, something is not then. one card - damn pancake In short, I'm waiting for a mirror five.
Pros
- good color Top cover - painted metal, looks and feels expensive Very good screen Not a bad matrix Comfortable grip Autofocus for eyes
Cons
- Lack of controls No stub Price, weight and size in comparison Crop in 4k One card slot
Pros
- After 5d mark 3 quickly figured out the controls. Plus, you can remap the buttons for yourself. Old EF lenses fit through an adapter. Focus points all over the field. There is focusing on the face, you can also refocus by clicking on the screen. The presence of a rotary screen makes it easier to shoot from non-standard angles. The screen itself is of good quality. High working ISO. According to ISO, the situation is ambiguous, I described it in more detail in the minuses. I was very pleased with the closing of the matrix with the camera turned off and changing the lens.
Cons
- I didn’t like, oddly enough, the focus. There are misses in tracking focus on moving objects. I got a few static ones with a lack of lighting. When the object is rotated, it does not immediately find the face. Perhaps the issue is solved with a new firmware, I don’t know - I rented it, so which version was - I shot it with that one. When pulling out of a slightly underexposed part of the picture, an unpleasant noise popped up. ISO was unpleasantly surprised. At ISO 800-1600 it makes the same noise, and somewhere worse than my old 5 d mark3. But the truth, I must note that with a further increase in iso, the situation in r-ki is much better. Those. ISO 4000 is still working, did not check further. Stabilization works constantly on a lens with a stub, even if you don’t aim and don’t shoot anything. Thus, the battery is consumed. You have to turn off the stub or the camera itself. When shooting on a non-native tamron, it draws a circle in jpg for the entire frame). Of course, it is not in the ravine, but the sediment remains unpleasant.
Pros
- Smart touch screen, 31MP, LP-E6 battery (in the best traditions :-) The entire fleet of lenses is installed on this device through an adapter, it seems, as they say, that lenses with an EF-S mount will also fit, but I don’t have such, I can’t check .
Cons
- There is a proximity sensor and automatic switching between the screen and the eyepiece. This constant switching to the eyepiece gets annoying when you bring the device close to you or pass it by with your hand, for example, to poke at the screen :-) But (!) You can leave either the eyepiece or the screen on, there is such a function. The touchpad under the thumb of the right hand also pissed off when I assigned ISO to it. Because I shoot in the manual, then periodically changed the parameter out of habit. Not critical, but still . I changed the setting to check the focus and it became absolutely super! 4K with crop! Like, 1.75 . It's a shame :-( And at first it was frightening that even when the device was turned off, the active mode indicator was on on the upper display, but this is the norm Lots of small nuances, but they just need to get used to! Especially when you switch from a DSLR and then in your hands this unit with a Canon EF 70-200mm 2.8L II lens looks somehow ridiculous EF lenses are noisy! I didn’t notice buzzing on DSLRs, but here they became noisier
Pros
- Specifications. Price. In early November, with a Chinese adapter, I took R-ku for 109.5 acceptable. Yesterday they were already sold for 119.5. Autofocus is better than on the second penny. But the topic of autofocus is classified by the company. They will never say that each new system is better than the previous one by 5-10 percent (perhaps even less) - sales will fall. In the technical branch of the R5, not everyone praises the new autofocus. Canon can please us with their improvements for a long time .. It is possible to focus on a point selected on the screen. Before buying, they strained the revelations of the owners, who wrote that they had forgotten and did not remember how to focus on the central point ... Interchangeable batteries with nickels. When turned off, the camera retracts the proboscis of the lens (85ii). Nicely.
Cons
- The ill-fated one hundred grams of weight (some people put it as a plus), removing convenient control dials, buttons for frequently used functions and an informative display (the second part is visible only after pressing the button) like on nickels. Focus on the eyes is good if at least one eye is looking into the lens! And if the model is drawing, reading, or turning her head, then the focus can be anywhere. It is necessary to press the screen with your finger (where the head of the model is). The focus will try to focus in this area, you need to crop it slowly, press the shutter button and the focus flies wherever it wants again ... It's better to switch to the point (I have eight presses of two buttons programmed). We could do it with one button in one click, but at the amateur level, the owner must always feel the inferiority of the camera. Video. Why does a photographer need a video? For me - "money down the drain." It is possible to program some buttons for other functions. It seems good, but it does not add much to the speed of control.
Pros
- Autofocus in the dark, ISO settings in dimly lit areas, RF optics
Cons
- If you dig around, I think you can find it, but I only take pictures in the framework of one work for her
Pros
- autofocus Matrix Build quality Ease of use (no matter what)
Cons
- Price, but in 2021 in general this is rather the norm If you want to take a camera for video, then at the wrong address
Pros
- bodies; Lenses sold separately
Cons
- Some little things
Pros
- Recording images to a Compact Flash Type I or II card (not included)
Cons
- Disappear
Pros
- New lens edge lighting correction setting; HDMI out
Cons
- Questionable purchase for seniors
