Optimized Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Discontinued by Manufacturer) Review

Very pleased with the lens. On the street I use it more often than "adult 70-200 2.8 is", because. lighter at times and gives some charm when taking pictures in the back and with a long focus with not very distant objects. For my taste, it somehow turns out more artistically than on a pro lens.

In general, a good lens, I liked it, Has some pros: Not heavy, the colors are quite natural, it takes great distances - a thrill Cons: It smears at the end, the tripod will fix it, but there is no way to always shoot with it

The lens is generally good, especially for those who switch from a whale lens, fast focus, you can shoot good portraits from 75-135, you can’t shoot at 300 mm without a tripod,

- for areal reporting), as well as for spotting, if I need to make a beautiful portrait or indoor report, festivals", trains, planes, it is not so scary to get wet, scratched, in comparison with other televisions, especially when shooting against the sun, and a very large minimum focusing distance - you can’t do macro photography on it.

I use it only with a tripod for shooting landscapes, I don’t need an ultrasonic motor, so I didn’t notice any shortcomings, especially for such a price.

Pros below: Low price, At 75 / 4.0 the picture is excellent, very beautiful bokeh, at 300mm it smears noticeably. Has some cons: A large change in length (you can collect dust inside) and a rotating mount for the filter,

Got pros: - low cost - the fact that this is a TELE lens - little weight - 7 petals! Cons below: sometimes the pictures are smeared, but this is my fault, because my hands were twitching, although if you set a normal shutter speed, then everything is EXCELLENT !

I bought it to expand the focal length, if you set long exposures without a tripod and shoot in the sun, if your hands do not tremble and you know how to catch light,

I wanted to buy a used one from my hands, here I am in February 2022 for 2700 light, once I took a picture, I look, it' still soap! I shot both in sports mode and in manual, shutter speeds of 800-1600 and still smears, ISO 500-800 years of using its Canon 500 Thus, in terms of quality, it is much inferior even to whale 18-55, that is, welcome - https://fotki.

I bought this device instead of a whale 18-55 (canon eos 550d camera), I got it for 4 with a little thousand, so I didn’t have high hopes for it right away, what was my surprise after the first experiments, with sufficient lighting, the sharpness is good on all FRs, see examples of shooting (http://fotki. the tower was shot on different FRs (75-300), the shooting was done on a sunny day with hands, without much effort, with AF turned off, the tower is quite high and being at the bottom it was…

11, if you open it wider, the blurring intensifies and very strong HA appear! I realized that this model is suitable for entry-level learning to hunt on targets with a maximum speed of 350-400 km / h (small aircraft, transport workers), and the F / 11 aperture requires good weather conditions (or high ISO = high noise) for more than 3 + Php? fbid=681248888663782&set=pb20220223360305394 &type=3&theater Php? fbid=680419845413353&set=pb20220223360305394 &type=3&theater the rest is there

I accidentally stumbled upon this lens, I had long wanted to buy something more far-sighted for the whale, because this is a proprietary Kenon lens that will work 100% you could buy Soviet optics like Jupiter 37, but the adapter ring, Without gaps, backlash, In the evening, iron hands are already needed if you shoot distant objects.

Has some pros I liked it very much, for such a price and such a zoom, it's super, I'm very satisfied. Compatible with Astronomical filters. Has some cons I would like it to be 50-300, and even better 18-300, but that would be too good.

Has pros: Affordable price, wide range of focal length adjustment, small mass for a telephoto lens. Cons: The disadvantages include not the highest aperture ratio. On the other hand, I do not use it indoors, but it is enough for the street.

The reviews, as always, are mind-blowing. Well, it's important to note the lens's drawbacks, such as its lack of a stub, its noisy motor, and its very small aperture. So go ahead and treat yourself to an IS, USM, and relax. But! That's not the same currency, right? ;) Thus there's no need to label as "disadvantages" the features that the maker proudly advertises. It's like buying a bicycle and then being disappointed that it can't reach 100 kilometers per hour in 5 seconds. The most magical…

I put five points with a minus for the ratio of quality and price. I took it for work (specifically - for areal reporting), as well as for spotting, traveling. Of course, if I need to make a beautiful portrait or indoor report, I will take a different lens. But with the tasks of filming "folk festivals", trains, planes, this one - copes. For such a price, it is not so scary to get wet, scratched, etc. In addition, in comparison with other televisions, it is relatively compact and lightweight

I bought a used one, I didn’t show myself (from the artistic side), I was completely disappointed in it and quickly sold it! if you are bored of walking from 18-55, good entertainment is provided for you (squirrels, birds and stuff like that), but not for long! IMHO! my rating is 3- Has pros: the advantages include a metal mount, a pleasant weight, well, that's all! With its cons. 1-sharpness 2-removals are terrible, especially after 135mm 3-long autofocus, even on a clear day! 4-you can…

Maybe, of course, I got a copy worse than others. Maybe the "handles" need to be corrected. Yeah. But. You can get a good picture, but only with skills in Photoshop. JPG-er is acceptable only under simple shooting conditions, but still almost always requires climbing into curves and a histogram. RAW improves things, of course. However, the need to cover the aperture to 6.3-7.1 is somewhat sad. I try not to push more than 135-150mm - soap climbs even on the covered one (not lubrication and not…

Super lens, whale and fixed, while they are resting. On nature, portraits are just super! I did not expect such sharpness. Excellent glasses (for such a price) Summary: if you want a TV set at a ridiculous price, take it boldly, you will not regret it. In nature, it is simply necessary. Has some pros Metal mount, made in Malaysia. Packing, instructions. Warranty, and most importantly, the price (took for 4.5 thousand). With its cons. They simply don’t exist, if you really find fault with…

For the price - a normal lens. In the presence of experience and knowledge - quite a working model, if there is good light. If you didn’t have telephotos before, then you won’t master it with a swoop. Nothing can be shot with hands at a long focal length with a shutter speed longer than 1/60, in addition, it should be remembered that the aperture forces the light to be pulled out with all its might by the camera settings, including ISO, which leads to matrix noise. On a tripod, the situation…