📸 Powerful and Versatile Canon EOS 70D Digital SLR Camera - Body Only Review
42
·
Very good
Rating
4.3
📷 Digital Cameras
Media
(4)
Details
| Model Name | Canon EOS 70D |
|---|---|
| Brand | Canon |
| Form Factor | SLR |
| Skill Level | Novice |
| Color | Black |
Description of 📸 Powerful and Versatile Canon EOS 70D Digital SLR Camera - Body Only
Discover the Power of the Canon EOS 70D Digital SLR Camera
When it comes to capturing stunning visuals and taking your photography to the next level, the Canon EOS 70D Digital SLR Camera is a true game-changer. With its impressive 20.2 MP APS-C CMOS sensor and DIGIC 5+ processor, this camera delivers exceptional image quality and clarity that will leave you in awe.
One of the standout features of the Canon EOS 70D is its advanced 19-point cross-type AF system, which ensures precise and fast autofocus, even in challenging shooting conditions. Whether you're capturing fast-moving subjects or focusing...
Pros
- I liked EVERYTHING ! When tracking focus, the viewfinder on the USSR optics is just enormous in comparison to the viewfinder on the 600D. It is a delight to concentrate on the USSR optics, but on the 600D you can only focus using LiveView, which is fantastic for video.
Cons
- Using ISO settings up to 800
Pros
- the presence of a video mode with intraframe compression
Cons
- twice as expensive as 700
Pros
- Decent price Ease of use Possibility of obtaining adequate pictures Ability to record adequate video clips
Cons
- If you approach the purchase wisely, being aware of all the limitations of this model in advance, then no shortcomings (in the context of unjustified expectations) were found.
Pros
- Pleasant color reproduction in most cases, accurate exposure metering, swivel screen in 3 planes
Cons
- White balance errors, the advantages of the device over the younger model are not obvious
Pros
- - Remote shooting via smartphone (EOS Remote).
Cons
- - ISO is high, As the plaster began to flake off at the bottom corner of the screen.
Pros
- Originally recorded on the 600D. The primary reason, in my opinion, why one should select it: 1. A viewfinder that is significantly larger in comparison to the one found on the 600D. (not bright: it has a brightness that is fairly comparable to that of the 600-ku; by the way, Nikon has viewfinders that are lighter). Nevertheless, you won't be able to do this with any other DSLR camera than the 600D or one that's designed for novices. If we are totally straightforward with one another, we must acknowledge that the numbers of coverage percentages and increases that are offered by manufacturers do not indicate anything. It will appear as though you are staring through a keyhole when you have completed 70 matches in the level 600. And without delay, he contrasted it with the number 6D. And for this reason, if you require a LARGE viewfinder, you go there; you can see EVERYTHING in it, and the viewfinder seems to be 1.5 times larger. However, we must acknowledge that the 70-ke already enables manual aiming with a shallow depth of field. This is a significant advancement. 2. Functionality - virtually anything and everything relating to shooting that you could ever want for. 3. The speed of the fire. Although the buffer is big, you will still need a fast SD card in order to record extended series in RAV. 5. Enhanced battery capacity in comparison to its predecessor. If you don't use the main screen very much, you won't have to charge the device as regularly if you do so. When aiming for adequate food for oneself for two to three weeks. 6. The use of STM lenses for video recording has become substantially more practicable thanks to improvements in tracking and autofocus capabilities, as well as capabilities that are silent, smooth, and accurate. 7. Effective operation of the touch screen is possible. Taking shots of macro subjects is much simplified by the touch focus feature. 8. You can access the internet wirelessly by configuring the EOS-Remote. despite the fact that you predict it will have further capabilities, it only has the current set. 9. An exposure measuring system that is both accurate and reliable. 10. Despite a slight increase in the device's overall weight, the carcass of the device has been redesigned to fit the hand of an average male better. This was accomplished by increasing the size of the device's grip. 11. A dexterous controller for SD cards that is incorporated inside the device itself. In this particular instance, taking a picture is made a great deal quicker by using a wire to connect the carcass to the camera. despite the fact that I utilized a card reader in practically all of my transactions. 12. In a same manner, the focus of the lenses in this series is capable of being finely adjusted; however, you cannot rely on the jambs manufactured by Sigma or alignment services for this adjustment. Even if the amount of noise in the matrix has only been reduced marginally (by a step), this is an advancement despite the fact that it is just minor. On previous sensors with 18 megapixels, black started to take on a purple tint at ISO 6400, and by the time the image was captured at ISO 12800, it was a total and utter failure. In this instance, ISO 6400 has developed into a setting that is almost usable, color reproduction is not adversely affected by noise, and details are kept almost totally; 12800 is an acceptable sensitivity setting (we are talking about RAW).
Cons
- 1. The mirror and the matrix have both been taken over by dust, which has taken up permanent residence there. In the past, all of the DSLRs in my collection were entry-level models, and I only infrequently came across a feature of that nature on any of them. I have a sneaking suspicion that the large mirror, which is positioned in such a way that it is set so that it is in close proximity to the mount cutoff, is the root of the issue. As a direct consequence of this, the huge mirror always picks up junk whenever the lens is switched. It is more compact and deeper on models that are younger. It was necessary for me to become familiar with a pear in order to maintain my personal standards of hygiene. In addition, in order to confirm that the matrix has been cleared after changing the lens, shutting off the camera and then turning it back on again will not be an unnecessary step. 2. Issues for those who own Tamron lenses that are powered by a mechanical drive, such as the 17-50 f/2. 8. There are problems with the autofocus while liveview and video are being used. If you focus the camera manually, there should be no issue. After one to two seconds, the carcass is no longer in contact with the lens after it starts moving back and forth in a crawling motion on the machine. This happens after the machine has been running for one to two seconds. To remedy the issue, simply power off the device and then turn it back on. 3. There is substantial discontent among users due to the lack of a white balance button (WB). Canon was under the assumption that this particular feature was utilized only a small percentage of the time for some unknown reason. The fact that it is NOT on the list of functions that can be altered so that they are associated with other buttons is by far the most crucial aspect of this! In addition, in order to access it, you will need to ensure that the primary screen is now open. 4. Compatibility with the external flashes created by third-party brands; prior to the initial upgrade, the Nissin Di622 that was manufactured did not function in any mode. There is no other option besides the built-in slave class. 5. The image noise is noticably higher than that of the direct competitor Nikon D7100, and the dynamic range is also lower than what is provided by the Nikon D7100. Both of these shortcomings are present in the Canon EOS 80D. It is not possible to recognize the full extent of the gain in picture quality until one upgrades to a camera that has a resolution of more than 18 megapixels.
Pros
- The fact that this is a truly semi-professional camera should be the first thing brought to your attention. All of the functions that were defined are present and are operating correctly. In comparison to the 60d, the matrix and focusing system have been modified. It is functionally similar to the top crop, the 7d (the difference in the viewfinder field of view being 98% rather than 100%, and the rate of shooting is 7 frames per second rather than 8). The existence of a variety of trendy chips, including as WiFi and a touch screen, helps to compensate for the slightly worse rate of fire and viewfinder that the weapon possesses.
Cons
- The only item that may be considered a nuisance is the lack of a hot button for white balance, as well as the inability to designate that button.
Pros
- - Ergonomics of older versions. - A high rate of firing in comparison to other cameras in its category. - Great autofocus (by points, by zones, manual point selection, manual adjustment). Quick. Very quick. - The highest level of convenience when shooting video and the highest quality pictures. a viewfinder that is both expansive and informative. - Interactive touchscreen.
Cons
- - Provide your own battery grip. - The wifi signal isn't particularly clear
Pros
- Extremely simple to operate; Very well put together. There is absolutely no audible noise produced when buttons are pressed or scroll wheels are turned. Nice touch; Battery with a large capacity (1800 mAh). The identical situation exists, for instance, in the 5D mark III; Simple switching between the photograph and the video mode; incredibly quick to focus Availability of protection from the elements; Because of the placement of the sizable battery in the grip of the camera, holding the camera in one's hand is a highly convenient experience; A readout of the electronic level is displayed in the viewfinder. To avoid doing so, it is quite helpful to not overwhelm the photographs.
Cons
- The "CA" mode, in its current state, continued to be of no utility (filmed on the 600D). The configurations are not being saved.
Pros
- Live View, swivel screen
Cons
- All the rest
