Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM lens, black Review

Optimal everyday choice for Canon body, replaces 40mm in full frame. Suitable for street, portraits (medium or long shot), landscapes and architecture. To shoot video you need a tripod or gimbal (no stabilization).

I've been using it for more than six months, I'm very satisfied. I mainly use it on my camera to shoot video. The camera has become easier and more convenient to work with. Bought for 60D. It's good for a crop. In the dark, it shoots very interestingly, like on film, noise that is pleasant to the eye.

An excellent lens for a "budget set" for a beginner amateur photographer. High quality pictures for a low price. Well complements the 50mm EF "portrait". Different pros: Light Pretty crisp Excellent viewing angle No noticeable distortion fast focus Cons: Only for crop. Buy a full-frame carcass - say goodbye to the pancake.

So far I'm happy with these two lenses. But now I found something that just gives me goosebumps Sigma 18-35mm f1.8 art, after a while I plan to sell my lenses and purchase this miracle of technology. Has pros: Excellent sharpness, excellent focus. Great addition to my 40mm pancake. Different cons: I took goods from Japan at an affordable price in the store, but in fact without a guarantee.

I am satisfied Has pros: A very handy travel lens - it's much easier to travel with as it's very light, can be used instead of a camera plug and take pictures when needed. Some cons: he, of course, will not allow you to make a good portrait, but he will not let you down when you need to shoot architecture

Since this glass was created for cameras with a cropped matrix, it makes no sense to impose any special requirements on it. However, I would like to share my experience. I photograph on a 600d carcass, I bought the lens in addition to the 50mm 1,4 and to replace (if I may say so) the whale 18-135. The FR turned out to be quitecomnvenient for me, I took the lens on a trip to St. Petersburg. But most of all I liked thecommpactness of the camera with this glass, I just carried the camera in my…

I have a lot of experience in photography. Studio subject photography. Worked with lenses: 18-55 kit The first version without a stub, it was included on the Canon 20D. The lens survived 2 cameras 20D and 500D and still works. I didn’t like 17-40L at all, I worked on the second penny. I took off my clothes in the layout, when you set a certain focal length and tilt the camera down with the lens (the clothes lie on the floor in the background) and press the sharpness button acomuple of times…

Based on my experience, this lens produces sharp and detailed photos, with great color rendition. It's compact and easy to carry around, making it perfect for street photography or travel. However, the autofocus can be a bit slow and noisy in low light situations.

Has pros: I took for the video to replace 40mm, since nothing fit into the frame Has cons: For video with 40mm there is no difference. For a photo less sharp

I use it as a base on my simple camera for amateur photography. On a cropped sensor, the wide-angle effect is quite weak, so it's not usually very noticeable. For my level, everything is ok, but professionals are unlikely to read comments about such lenses)

I do not shoot landscapes, but I actively use this lens on my second canon 800D camera. I am attaching some photos taken with it. I am satisfied with the lens, I recommend it for purchase. In terms of price / quality ratio, this is an excellent option, and there are no alternatives on the market.