Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 50
  • 5
    33
  • 4
    14
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like the product, it fully meets my expectations.

went on two seasons of travel. 50/50 on and off-road surfaces. With a run of roughly 50 thousand kilometers, rubber wears down by 70 to 80 percent. Basically, food is consumed while lying on the ground. First of all, it might be advised to people who prefer to travel off-road than on roads. With advantages: True off-road tires. Unless it is seated on its belly, the car can be driven on any surface. It doesn't disturb me, although there is a minor rumbling on the road. Rapid wear, a conditional…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy, it really is worth buying.

215 / 65r16 I'm content since I've put in the work on the field, been to Karelia and the Crimea, and driven all across the Hong Kong region. I'm not into extreme sports, but at the places I've been, crossover shoes are no longer allowed. The flow rate is 10 liters per minute on the roadway provided that you do not drown more than 100 people. The top speed is 125 miles per hour (with a fully inflated spare tire stored in the trunk). Compared to a factory stamped wheel, the alloy wheel assembly…

Pros
  • Rubber did not make nearly as much noise as was anticipated on the field. Improves one's self-assurance when working in muck. The consumption on the highway has increased, but it has not yet beyond the psychological mark despite the fact that it behaves acceptably while it is on the pavement.
Cons
  • Although the hooks appear to be gears from the outside, the rut is only weakly climbed out of.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Everything is fine, there are only minor drawbacks.

This rubber meets my needs, so I'm happy about that. I frequently take my automobile on rough terrain. Allow the already slow dynamics of the ShNiv to be further slowed by the huge diameters of the same cordians, which will also increase fuel consumption. If you go fishing once a month and sometimes just for a picnic, you might not need it. Not too much noise will be there alongside the increased traffic, although gourmets will not appreciate this.

Pros
  • It's easy to maneuver in the mud and can handle a moderately steep ascent. Kama Euro 205/75/15 used to be on my ShNiva. Acceleration dynamics were not negatively impacted by the addition of 205 cordians. The drop in ground clearance is minimal, at just 5 mm. Although slightly larger in diameter than advertised, fuel usage has remained unchanged. It works effectively on dry pavement but slightly less so on wet. It's not quite as good as Kama Euro, but it's not "oak" either.
Cons
  • It's still buzzing, though much less than before. If you think you can't hear her, you'd better double-check. Specifically, the "urban" speed range (about 50–80 miles per hour). Above 100, it's difficult to hear above road and wind noise (the car is brand new). Even though I haven't tried them, "Behind the Wheel" magazine claims that MTGudrich and other imports are "also buzzing." It has trouble breaking the cyclical pattern. The vibration felt through the wheel during braking is minor, but present nonetheless. It's not very good in the winter since it slides all over the ice and sinks into the snow.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is really good, Im glad I bought it.

It should be put on the Patriot. Last summer, when we broke up, the mud kneads went off with a boom! The norm on asphalt surfaces. The noise does not bother me at all. Do not drive faster than 100 kilometers per hour. There is a challenge in the winter, and that challenge is that you have to go into turns extremely gently and cautiously because the wind is blowing. Even with all-wheel drive, it is impossible to navigate packed snow and ice because there are no spikes on the tires. It rows like…

Pros
  • Cost and permeability of the market
Cons
  • void of any thorns

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Product satisfying the quality of the product, good price.

My decision! Despite several drawbacks, it is still worth the money. I will only replace the front wheels that have been bit with a fresh set of Cordics. I suggest. With its benefits: strong off-road capabilities. Of course, just for fishing or hunting, never for trophy raiding! On the highway, there is hardly no noise. Hopefully not any louder than winter. a good protector. The cost of MT rubber is reasonable. really well on the track. even at velocities over 120. With drawbacks: extremely…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didn't expect the quality to be so high.

This rubber was bought for use on my Nissan Niva as I embark on my unusual hobby of off-roading. I was honestly anticipating considerably poorer performance on the asphalt with mud tires. These Cordians have far surpassed my wildest dreams; they stop and steer with pinpoint precision and are surprisingly quiet compared to other M/T. They have a sturdy base and sidewalls that perform admirably on stones and light soils, and they perform effectively in liquid clay and peat for their size and…

Pros
  • The topic of this letter is 215/65/16. Gorgeous mud tires that won't break the bank. It's comparable to its foreign counterparts in terms of driving qualities, durability, and wear resistance.
Cons
  • The odd policy of their look and the limited size of their dimensions.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

Now that I own a cordiant, all I want to do is dig up more dirt. The car's acceleration (field) became noticeably more difficult in the city, although after a while I got used to it. The beaches are still accessible. In general, when I'm behind the wheel, I'm cheerful and carefree. Paid for expert help: Based on my limited experience (about six to seven thousand kilometers), I can state that getting stuck in the mud on this rubber is only possible if the vehicle is sitting on its bottom. The…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

They say that the major caveat is that tires are uncontrollable in the cold. Gentlemen, if you keep your speed below 90 in the cold, you should be fine. Yes, it is uncontrollable and continues in that manner when the brake is applied, but it behaves similarly to factory-standard summer tires, thus I don't see that as a drawback. As winter wore on, Proezdil patiently worked on it without making a peep. It manifested at a level of 5 +++ in the mud porridge, but I have yet to test it in the sands…

Pros
  • Great capacity to travel long distances (insane for an NIVA) with no modifications (not even stronger jet rods)
Cons
  • not uncovered; no problems there.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

What you need, a cool purchase, I advise you.

I bought for ShNiva in the amount of 235/75-15 instead of 205/70 of the same model. The previous cords struck with their versatility, even on broken asphalt it is very comfortable! Softly. But here 235/75 is hellish wheels for a shevik, because. the load index is 109, as it were, trucks . Hence the negative, it’s unrealistic to drive on broken asphalt, and the cars will fall apart . Don’t worry mom, bleed it to 1.4 - it got better, but not that coat . I will change for tires with a lower load…

Pros
  • Rows great
Cons
  • Rigid in size 235/75-15