- Avoids blurring. Gentle on the pavement. 80000km of resources.
- Because it lacks a side hook, it can be dragged away in a side skid. I solved the problem somewhat by cutting radial grooves 2 into each tire.
- Only in the summer do I crack out my 1996 Niva. Some benefits for the price: - it keeps 120 km/h normally on the highway - who says hard - it is soft (if the pressure is 1.8 - 1.9 - it swallows almost all the bumps) - rowing in the mud is great - normally holds the floor of the atmosphere on the sand and in the mud - never had problems on wet pavement, also in puddles - like on asphalt The amount of gas he uses has not gone up, and he is able to break out of his rut normally, despite the fact that it has taken him two years to master this.
- That's it from me, MT; have a nice day! - chomps up the beginning (this step is critical for understanding the similarity collapse). - tires that are too heavy (wheels that are too heavy are not recommended; customers often express dissatisfaction during the tire fitting process; perhaps there is something else; I'm just not interested).
- Price, quality of the lugs, and ability to avoid ruts.
- Unfortunately, the cost is just too high to justify it.
- Permeability, and the cost.
- Immature to climb out of the mud and onto the beach.
- Acceptability, presentation!
- before I picked it up!
- The cost, mileage that is more or less bearable in the mud, excellent wear resistance, and it is not the heaviest of the MT tires.
- The number of checkers per inch, as well as the depth of the tread. You are free to enhance anything; all you need to do is say thank you.
- Longevity; behaved itself on the primer. City life is really smoothly organized.
- Typical MT noise.
- Non-noisy, effective on both dry and wet surfaces, cross-country capability, affordable
- They are not for me
- gentle, unobtrusive, and cost-predictable
- unable to avoid sinking into mud pits due to a lack of side lugs
- no hernias, price
- No