Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 50
  • 5
    33
  • 4
    14
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not a bad product, but I expected a little more.

Measurements 225/75-16 real measurements wheel height 73 cm, tread width 17 cm, and edge to edge width 22.5 cm. You must blow off in order to operate off-road. If the protection (17 cm) blows off, all 22.5 cm work. It is washed out for people who drive on primers rather than on mud or clay.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

It has some flaws but the product is usable.

Quality rubber paired with a solid foundation. One negative ruins the illusion that there is no side hook; catching even a tiny side drift on a straight line will result in a ditch, and you will have to deal with a skid that has zero percent chance of success. improves, though only by correcting a defect. The lack of direct factory production of this groove is puzzling. Even though rubber is listed at m/t, it doesn't "howl" on the racetrack.

Pros
  • Avoids blurring. Gentle on the pavement. 80000km of resources.
Cons
  • Because it lacks a side hook, it can be dragged away in a side skid. I solved the problem somewhat by cutting radial grooves 2 into each tire.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best thing for the money, glad I did it.

Liked rubber! I don't think it's necessary to shell out twice as much for something else. Eighty percent urban, twenty percent rural (just rural, not a primer). More than 40,000 miles driven (6-season average wear of 80 percent) I don't see the fact that delamination started (didn't follow the pressure) as a drawback. I don't know how it was for other people, but there were no issues after I unscrewed the screws and screws myself multiple times (the rubber is thick). Gas to the floor from the…

Pros
  • Only in the summer do I crack out my 1996 Niva. Some benefits for the price: - it keeps 120 km/h normally on the highway - who says hard - it is soft (if the pressure is 1.8 - 1.9 - it swallows almost all the bumps) - rowing in the mud is great - normally holds the floor of the atmosphere on the sand and in the mud - never had problems on wet pavement, also in puddles - like on asphalt The amount of gas he uses has not gone up, and he is able to break out of his rut normally, despite the fact that it has taken him two years to master this.
Cons
  • That's it from me, MT; have a nice day! - chomps up the beginning (this step is critical for understanding the similarity collapse). - tires that are too heavy (wheels that are too heavy are not recommended; customers often express dissatisfaction during the tire fitting process; perhaps there is something else; I'm just not interested).

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

has various benefits: On asphalt 180 and regular), that roar is so loud that it appears we are about to launch. Cons: Quickly destroyed. It turns into skates even on gently rolled snow, making it impossible to stop the automobile.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the level, I am satisfied with everything.

Advantages: On asphalt 180 and regular) that's just such a rumble that it looks now that we'll go for takeoff))) Below are some downsides: Very easily derailed. Even on snow that has been rolled little, it transforms into skates, making it impossible to stop the vehicle.

I brought it with me to the Niva. Those who have said that it is noisy appear to have an appreciation for music on par with that of great performers. It is impossible for there to be complete silence on a field. And for those who choose to participate, there is a requirement for such a car in order to get from point A to point B. Excellent tires at the asking price. He does not row any more poorly than the Maxis or Boris Fedoroch. If you are already stuck on it, you can get off with the…

Pros
  • Price, quality of the lugs, and ability to avoid ruts.
Cons
  • Unfortunately, the cost is just too high to justify it.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, did not expect at all for the price.

With its positives being: To all that has been said, I will only add one key detail: even when you ride it over puddles, the glass does not spatter. In contrast to the traditional Shnivovsky Barguzin and other types of rubber with a shallow tread. Cons: After two years of calm driving up to 100 km each day, they started to slide a little on wet roads after they began to develop some wear and tear on the tires. The impression that one gets is that the rubber layer that is most recently added is…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the level, I am satisfied with everything.

I won't ever use stock road tires once more. I'll either switch to the same ones or more "evil" ones with more side-slip stability. has benefits Comfortable off-road speed is +15 km/h. The vehicle (a Renault Duster) is now somewhat higher and twice as supple (especially on asphalt). Cool predatory cat art and look). Patency on clay and sand is +50. It clearly holds the road; it does not slide on clay and does not lead off. The holds are far better on the sand. On asphalt, 130 is a comfortable…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best purchase in my life, I will definitely buy it again.

The biggest benefit is the price; for that sum of money, I can overlook whatever she has done wrong. It's quiet and smooth when crawling in the mud. The first set I bought (225/75R16) lasted 5 full years of all-season use without showing any signs of wear. New price is 275/70R16, and wear over the past 12 months has been nearly nothing. Even in the snow, it rows without a hitch. Inability to use lateral lug to escape rut. Be very careful when driving on sand, as the least misstep will force it…

Pros
  • Permeability, and the cost.
Cons
  • Immature to climb out of the mud and onto the beach.

I stay away from the city. The fundamental issue is that clay only functions as a lubricant when it is wet. On this rubber, you can drive, if not in a deluge. Since I've been driving for two years, I've become accustomed to noise and have considered how much I detest skidding on hard surfaces. Its benefits Good mud and common summer asphalt tires, in general. In particular, it rows well in muck (apart from swamps), is well balanced (and doesn't hit at speeds between 100 and 130), once…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like the product, it fully meets my expectations.

This tire was purchased for UAZ. The capacity to travel long distances is really stylish. Chains! I totally forgot about those! Like a plow, it scrapes the bridges. I believed it was hopeless to plant the first impression, but alas, I reached the forest itself, where I had previously poked my head and still buried it up to the very doors)))) It took a tractor to get it out of there. On a snowy path, it conducts itself with poise. Even if you can't glide across it on skates, the ice still…

Pros
  • Acceptability, presentation!
Cons
  • before I picked it up!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

High-quality product, the price corresponds to the quality.

Manufacturing in Taiwan. Rubber has been tested and found to be OK; it will be used in the size 205/70 R15 for the Suzuki Jimny. The tread is normally suitable for use on asphalt, and it performs admirably well in muddy conditions. The level of noise is extremely manageable, and there is a minimal amount of wear for 20,000 kilometers and the summer season. There aren't any issues with the sidewalls, but the vehicle is quite lightweight, even more so than the Niva. Consists of: Braking. It's not

I started off with a first field set of 205/70 R15, drove 20,000 kilometers, and after Vli 5 it seemed amazing)) After that, there were 235/75 R15 tires also on the Niva, but they were prepared; I drove approximately 30,000 kilometers with those. I had a lot of appreciation for the rubber, but in the end I went with Goodrich 35e for the UAZ 3151. They are obviously no longer in the running. already, the UAZ Patriot, already in its third year on 275/70R16, has a relatively low mileage on its…

Pros
  • The cost, mileage that is more or less bearable in the mud, excellent wear resistance, and it is not the heaviest of the MT tires.
Cons
  • The number of checkers per inch, as well as the depth of the tread. You are free to enhance anything; all you need to do is say thank you.

Wear a Suzuki Jimny. Based on the evaluations, I was anticipating a noisy ride on the highway and subpar handling on asphalt and in the city. In reality, I was able to drive 300 kilometers at a period with no issues other than some little road noise that became noticeable at around 80 kilometers per hour. Even though the passport recommended a maximum of 1.8 atm in the front and 2.0 atm in the back, the wheels were easily balanced at the station after being pumped up to 2.4 atm. When I followed

Pros
  • Longevity; behaved itself on the primer. City life is really smoothly organized.
Cons
  • Typical MT noise.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good one.

I couldn't be happier with how the MT tread performed on asphalt. At first, I was concerned that it could be too aggressive for the surface, but my fears were unfounded. Rubber is an excellent material. Not a single puncture in the past three years. The Winter hack has already been punched twice.

The city should not use rubber! Even so, many people in the city ride it. Niva and Patrick are my top picks. fully supports the drawing. Wishing everyone on the road luck! With advantages: Price. On the Patriot I mounted it.Sand, dirt, and clay—everything goes off with a bang! Effective rooting. ideal for outings like hunting and fishing. very excellent and inexpensive. Pros below: heavy and needs special installation care. Although there are no spikes, it simply isn't possible to drive on ice;

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good one.

My wife said that I don't hear anything like on the Dunlop sj6 winter Velcro, there is no vibration or discomfort, and the tires are excellent for the super cornfield! I put a Chevrolet on my field in the amount of 205/70 15r, this size is enough for me, the tires are soft, not noisy up to 80 km, you can't hear it at all, after 80 there is not a big rumble, it doesn't get louder up to 105, and I had four different varieties of rubber from Cordiant for a long time, but I didn't expect such…

Pros
  • Non-noisy, effective on both dry and wet surfaces, cross-country capability, affordable
Cons
  • They are not for me

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

For use primarily in the countryside and on the ground, I recently purchased a 265/70R16 first-generation Pajero Sport. But I put 15,000 kilometers on it in a variety of conditions, including asphalt, gravel, and sand. Goodrich 245/70R16 stood in contrast to the cordial. 1. the cordiant is much softer (when I went to the village near Hong Kong for the first time on the cordiant - I thought they patched the road; when they stood on the side of the road without wheels on jacks, the PITs of the…

Pros
  • gentle, unobtrusive, and cost-predictable
Cons
  • unable to avoid sinking into mud pits due to a lack of side lugs

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad buy, well worth the money.

Based on its pricing, I recommend it for driving in mud of any quality, but not for driving on rocks. wheels, making it "universal" and fast because I travel 120 miles from my house. has various benefits: perfectly adheres to any muck, including clay and marsh mud. Quiet, great grip on dry roads, slight "crawl" on wet roads, but only at certain speeds. With drawbacks: Microhernias were able to emerge on three wheels directly along the tread after traveling 30 kilometers over a huge stone (the…

On the Patriot, a pal of mine has one! He enjoys riding, mixing mud, fishing, hunting, and other outdoor activities, therefore these tires are ideal for this batch. A friend of mine, if I'm not mistaken, has skated them for three seasons and is as content as a March cat))). The pricing is reasonable and is quite standard for tires in this class. Since we've recently solely talked about tires, I can say with certainty that Max is happy with his purchase of a Cordiant.

Pros
  • no hernias, price
Cons
  • No