Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
cordiant off road 205/70 r16 97q summer logo

Cordiant Off Road 205/70 R16 97Q summer Review

50

·

Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.6
Sports and Outdoors, 🥋 Sports & Fitness, 🚴‍♀️ Cycling, 🥋 Sports & Fitness

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to Cordiant Off Road 205/70 R16 97Q summer
img 2 attached to Cordiant Off Road 205/70 R16 97Q summer
img 3 attached to Cordiant Off Road 205/70 R16 97Q summer
img 4 attached to Cordiant Off Road 205/70 R16 97Q summer

Description of Cordiant Off Road 205/70 R16 97Q summer

Cordiant Off Road. Reliably behaves in the most difficult operating conditions, giving the driver confidence behind the wheel. Unsurpassed overcoming of any obstacles and excellent handling in difficult road conditions: sand, clay, mud. Cordiant Off Road is Cordiant''s new off-road off-road tire! The Cordiant Off Road model was first introduced by Cordiant as an off-road tire. The domestic tire is designed for modern off-road vehicles, pickups and SUVs. Designed specifically for tough conditions, the Cordiant Off Road tire leaves the rider with complete confidence in every action. Functional char...

Reviews

Global ratings 50
  • 5
    33
  • 4
    14
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for the price.

This will be my third vehicle purchase. Coopers and Goodriches are the worst. More importantly, it saves money over time. Like any other mt, the loudness doesn't bother me.

Pros
  • Benefits include durability, smooth rowing, resistance to washing, and a reasonable cost.
Cons
  • The typical balance weight is 100 grams.

I declare ha the whole country, because there is no strength to register at every forum. Cordiant Off Road 215/65 R16 102Q STANDS ON NIVA URBAN! Don't rub anything! Not front or back, right or left. Disks regular from the store. I don't know the specifications. Set and do not be afraid!

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product suited me, I will recommend it to my friends.

For country roads, dirt roads and asphalt 50x50. If without fanaticism, then the optimal tires for UAZ. For 7 years of operation and 60 thousand mileage, of course, it has worn off, but it has lived up to its expectations. Its pros: Rows well in medium mud even without a front axle (Patriot). Not as noisy as expected. Made in Korea. Cons: Floats in a rut, the speed develops more slowly than on a highway. In winter, on ice, it is simply dangerous, but it is generally acceptable to get out of the

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best price for such a product, I will buy more!

Compared with imported counterparts. I will take it again, because. Due to its hardness, it is excellent for asphalt. I recommend to everyone who does not want to change shoes before pokatushki to the country. Pros below: NIVA car For three seasons (70t. Km) wear on the rear 60% on the face 80%. when driving on asphalt 80%. For such tires, I think super. Moreover, the car traveled mainly on regional roads with a dead surface and constant overload. Coopers bought STT good tires but ate in 4…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is top notch, be sure to try it.

stand on a Chevrolet Niva (215x65x16), working in the city during the week and the suburbs on the weekends. At speeds of up to 130 km/h (81 mph), the cornfield no longer accelerates onto the highway. Dragged with a crash on the wet, dark earth uphill. Only once did I get caught on them, and that was when I was running through the night and hit a rut coming from the Urals and got stopped on some bridges. Well-balanced and a normal slowdown rate; no problems here. I did not think twice about…

Pros
  • 1. dragged incessantly Two words: cheap and reliable M/T tires. Shniva flatters them tremendously. 4. pliable; I'd forgotten the pavement had cracks and potholes. 5. long-lasting Quick cleanup, number six
Cons
  • just those that are inherent to M/T rubber's structure - 1 loud (although the dispenser is much louder). 2 I wouldn't take Cordiant Snow Cross of the same size in the winter because I haven't tried it and 90% of the reviews are unfavorable. Third, you can't roll (with that tread). Fourth, when driving through deep puddles, I take extra precautions. (no slits for water drainage) 5. They prefer to dig in loose sand and pebbles.

Tire size 225/75/16, riding a UAZ hunter. When she's this size, she's much more toothy than the Nivovsky version. There was total silence in the vehicle. It acts normally up to 110 km/h, but starts to vibrate and get louder beyond that. for 10,000 kilometers without so much as a scratch or hernia. I was pleased to see a large self-tapping screw in my new winter tires until I unscrewed it and discovered a hole that was not completely through. Over the course of three seasons, I abandoned a…

Pros
  • It's a good rowboat; there's no slippage even in moderate mud. Huge tread, easy to maintain cleanliness. A steep clay mountain was easily climbed despite the rain. This was never a poisoned meal. Suitable for snow digging. Soft. This type of rubber holds its own rather admirably on the circuit. Not that I heard anything. They were so well-balanced that I was able to load quite a little more onto them.
Cons
  • Not at this low of a price.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The item was good, I'll recommend it to my friends.

I needed a set of cheap off-road tires for my cheap domestic SUV, and Korda was the clear winner. As a native of Shniva, you can grow to even larger proportions (up to 215 without the aid of a lift). Despite being purchased at the end of winter, I waited until spring to switch to a different pair of shoes. First impressions in the snow after switching to non-studded Bridgestone tires for the winter? Twice as much rumbling and vibration in the cabin. In the icy streets as well as on the paved…

Pros
  • Off-roaders, here's a cheap and reliable option.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The item was good, I'll recommend it to my friends.

Instead of purchasing 205/70 of the identical type, I paid 235/75 for ShNiva. Even on cracked asphalt, the previous cords' adaptability made them exceedingly comfortable. Softly. However, due of the load index of 109, or trucks, in this case, 235/75 is a horrific set of wheels for a shevik. The cars will disintegrate since it is unrealistic to drive on damaged asphalt. bled it to 1.4 and don't worry, mama; it got better, but not that coat. I'll swap them for tires that have a lower load index…

Pros
  • Rows well
Cons
  • Size 235/75-15 rigid

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like it, thanks for the quality product.

To put it simply, I don't like city life. When wet, clay becomes a mere lubricant, making it difficult to work with. Even in a serious downpour, you can keep driving on these tires. For the past two years, I have been behind the wheel, so I am accustomed to noise and can accommodate my aversion to sliding, harsh surfaces. has certain advantages: Standard summertime asphalt tires are fine for the mud. It is well-balanced (and does not strike at speeds of 100-130), has smashed a glass bottle…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Satisfied with the product, I recommend it to everyone.

When compared to the other ambient noises of the field, the handout's howling at 100 km/h is the loudest sound. They rowed with assurance. Almost minimal deterioration after 15,000 miles. Although the rubber is tough, you'll still have to work at finding a way to crack it in the woods or among the rocks.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Performs its functions, nothing unusual.

225/75/16 standing on the field I purchased a new one because I don't see the point in using worn-out off-road tires; the noise is minimal on asphalt when they are new with large treads, but I noticed that after the kama, the flame-acceleration became worse, the consumption increased by 3-5l, and the pluses-clearance increased)) without skidding; however, you can only ride a kame flame in the summer on cords! summer tires, please! If a salesperson claims that anything is all-weather, do not…

Pros
  • cost and permeability
Cons
  • In pairs, they do not leave the groove in the mud because they are too heavy for the fields with stock razdatkoy and ch.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A good quality product, I rate this purchase perfectly.

What will take place during the winter is still uncertain. However, in my opinion, it is comparable to the ordinary season. and the huge checkers make it much better, in my opinion. The purchase is quite delighted overall. I wish I had purchased it sooner. All-purpose tires that are good and affordable. If you let up a little pressure on packed snow in the winter, it is fairly usual. And it accelerates faster than any winter tires on loose snow.

Pros
  • The cost is twice as low as the original. along a highway. The word wouldn't terrify me. quiet! Seriously! AT tires were also cordiant 4x4 235/70/R16 prior to that. and the noise did not worsen after switching to 225/75/R16 MT cordiant off road! My own is far more silent. I'd grade the grip qualities in the mud as good. Whereas previously it was essential to turn on the front end, it may now easily climb on the back. Subjectively speaking, the preceding AT rubber is not heavier. Objectively speaking, there has been no change in the consumption. Pretty soft. Iveco F1A A/M UAZ Patriot 2.3 TDI
Cons
  • not very large: ( The rolls at the corners appeared to have slightly widened. However, given that the rubber is softer, the profile is higher, and the breadth is lower, it makes sense.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for money, one of the best offers.

An outstanding option for a field that has a lift, making it suitable for off-road excursions across practically any terrain, including mud, sand, and stones. The quality is lower than that of certain decent foreign rubber, but it is more affordable. On ice, it keeps worse than the same Kama Flame, and during the winter it is generally better not to ride it, despite the fact that it is, as it were, "all-weather". Having traveled on rides with other fields, I noticed that these cords really…

Pros
  • They handle the asphalt really well. They flatten well under low pressure and do not dismantle, making them ideal for riding in muddy conditions. They are able to handle the snow well. Resistance to wear that is normal (for MT rubber).
Cons
  • In general, they dislike ice and snow that has been packed down tightly.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything in the purchase suits, a very necessary product.

Put in the UAZ 469 in the fall of 2013. After YAI-357A, Cordiant works wonders through the muck! Yes, and how RIDES in the winter on sloppy, wet snow! On the crust, however, it burrows and stays put. I lost blood to 0.3 in the mud, but it rides great. The sides are in perfect condition. climbed ruts and stumps. (Surveyor) I drive 90% off-road. The tires have driven 8000 kilometers. No wear was noticed. Take the advice given!

Pros
  • adequate cross-country performance, reasonable pricing, superb balance, light weight (20-25 grams), and sturdy cord.
Cons
  • On the ice in the winter, you could drown! In terms of size. The 31st would work for me.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

has various benefits: The vehicle (a Nissan Iva Chevy) is a tank. The automobile actually laid on its side when I tested it in the mud, yet it emerged with a boom. Rubber also behaves well in the city (Hong Kong). Several drawbacks Due to the rigidity of the tread rubber, the hardness of the impact is felt when the wheels strike rough surfaces, such as highways with pits. They pounded the suspension like they were using a sledgehammer.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product, more pros than cons.

Below are some advantages: decent rubber, pretty strong (no roots, broken bottles, stones, or anything else), good for fishing, camping, and nature. Pros below: who frequently travels off-road and spends less on public transportation to afford more expensive foreign tires (which maintains track better and is cleaner).

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A nice option for the money, one of the best deals.

Her mount was a crocodile. 30,000 km of riding. So, I sold it along with the car. When driving a Kaley in the winter on ice, I twice exited the vehicle into a ditch after abruptly shifting from first to second gear while traveling straight. between 15 and 25 km/h, H. The Patriot 275 70 P 16 Off Road will be worn by me. It is best not to hunt or fish for money for hunters and fishers! It is not very strong in terms of competition.

Pros
  • Cost and design
Cons
  • 80% ring road, 20% dirt, in an erased well.

Despite rubber's many drawbacks, I believe its many benefits outweigh them. Cordiants are extremely difficult to puncture using nonstandard implements. Benefits from: Drives smoothly even in the muck. The snow is a bonus for this rubber. She is at home on the stony peaks of the highlands. Hydroplaning at over 120 km/h on the roadway was completely absent in the summer. Negatives: Niva, when mounted in the front, wears out substantially more quickly than when mounted in the rear. Constant or…