Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 53
  • 5
    35
  • 4
    13
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good purchase.

I bought this tire for UAZ! The cross-country ability is chic, I was pleasantly surprised. I forgot about the chains. It scrapes bridges like a plow. I thought it was impossible to plant the first impression, but alas, I reached the forest itself, overcoming many obstacles where earlier and didn’t poke my head and still buried it right up to the very doors)))) I had to pull it out with a tractor. It behaves with dignity on a snowy track. Of course, the ice is not on skates, but it holds well

Pros
  • Passability, appearance!
Cons
  • until I noticed!

Revainrating 3 out of 5

It's not a bad product, but I expect more.

Good rubber with a good resource. One drawback spoils the impression there is no side hook, that is, if you catch the slightest side drift, even on a straight line, you are guaranteed a ditch, you will cope with a skid of 0 chances. fixes a flaw, but it gets better. Why this groove is not made directly at the factory is not clear. Rubber is declared as m / t, but it does not "howl" on the track either.

Pros
  • Doesn't blur. Soft on the road. Resource 80000km.
Cons
  • There is no side hook, it easily carries away into a side skid. I cut radial grooves 2 on each wheel, the situation improved a little.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well made the product is, just magical!

An excellent choice for a field with a lift for off-road trips with almost any terrain: mud, sand, stones. Worse than some good imported rubber, but also cheaper. On ice, it keeps worse than the same Kama Flame, in winter it is generally better not to ride it, despite the fact that it is, as it were, "all-weather". : having traveled on rides with other fields, I noticed that these cords really flatten very well when the pressure is reduced, but at the same time they do not disassemble (although

Pros
  • They ride well on asphalt. They ride great in the mud, flatten well at low pressure, do not disassemble. They ride well in the snow. Normal wear resistance (for MT rubber).
Cons
  • In general, they do not like ice and hard-packed snow.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good purchase.

It rows and clings well in the mud, it cleans up quickly and the grip on the pavement is not bad, at least enough for the Niva. I am sure that similar tires will cost about two thousand more, or even more. . I have been using it since I was 12 on my Niva. Then I bought two more pieces when the front ones were worn out. It rides well on snowy porridge, but I advise you not to use it in winter. My brother also put this rubber on his Niva. I saw her on the UAZ at the inspectors of the reserve in…

Pros
  • It rows well, clings in the mud, it cleans up quickly and the grip on the pavement is not bad, at least enough for the Niva. Traveled 140 Price. Now there are more sizes.
Cons
  • You don't have to drive in winter, but I did. Noisy, but it's mud tires. In fact, there are no shortcomings.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

Taiwan production. Rubber is completely satisfied, used in size 205/70 R15 for Suzuki Jimny. Pros below: Normally for such a tread it goes on asphalt, in the mud it's just fine. Noise is very moderate, scanty wear for the summer season and 20 thousand kilometers. No problems with the sidewalls, but the car is light, lighter than the Niva. Its cons: Braking. It's not very pleasant. If you press the brake pedal, a sharp squeal, but then slows down adequately. At first it was annoying, then I got…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

Having bought a cordiant, all I do is try to find dirt, but more. In the city, it really became a little harder for the car to accelerate (field), but you get used to it, nevertheless this rubber is not made for the city. You can still get to any beach!)))) In general, I drive, I am happy and I don’t know troubles. Its pros: From a little experience, about 6-7,000 km, I can say that you can get stuck in the mud on this rubber only if the car sits on the bottom. In any other cases, you don’t…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best thing for the money, glad I did it.

Traveled for two seasons. Asphalt/off-road about 50/50. Wear of rubber is about 70-80% with a run of about 50 thousand km. Basically, of course, eaten on the pavement. First of all, it can be recommended to those who travel off-road more often than on roads. Pros: Real OFF-ROAD tires. The car drives on any surface, unless it sits on its belly. The rumble on the asphalt is moderate (at least it doesn't bother me). Has cons: Rapid wear (conditional disadvantage, characteristic of almost any…

Personally, I am satisfied with this rubber, because. I often drive my car off-road. And let the large diameters of the same cordians reduce the already sluggish ShNiv dynamics and increase fuel consumption. Those who go fishing once a month and sometimes for a picnic should think about whether they need it. In general, along with good traffic, not too intrusive noise will appear, but gourmets, of course, will not like it.

Pros
  • It goes well in the mud, even on a not too steep climb. Previously, my ShNiva had Kama Euro 205/75/15. With 205 cordians, the acceleration dynamics did not deteriorate. Ground clearance has decreased by only 5 millimeters. (Its diameter is even a little more than stated), Fuel consumption has not increased. On dry pavement it goes well, on wet it is a little worse. Slightly worse than Kama Euro, but not "oak".
Cons
  • It still buzzes, but not much, I expected the worst. Don't trust anyone that you can't hear her. Especially somewhere from 50 to 80, i. E. the most "urban" speed. 100 and above - almost inaudible over other noises (car is new). I did not try MTGudrich and other imports, but in the magazine "Behind the Wheel" they wrote that they were also buzzing. It doesn't get out of the loop very well. When braking, there is a vibration on the steering wheel, but these are trifles. I tried it in the winter - I didn’t like it, it slips on the ice and burrows in the snow.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing I've ever used, I recommend it to everyone!

I have a strange hobby - I go on off-road expeditions in a Niva car, for this purpose this rubber was purchased. From frankly mud tires I expected much worse behavior on asphalt. These Cordians exceeded all my expectations, they brake and control perfectly, compared to other M / T - very quiet. In off-road conditions, they are well etched and flattened well, a solid base and sidewalls work very well on stones and soft soils, for their size and class they work adequately in liquid clay and peat.

Pros
  • I am writing about 215/65 16. Gorgeous mud tires for the price. It has good driving qualities, is resistant to wear, and is comparable to foreign counterparts.
Cons
  • Few dimensions and a strange policy of their appearance.

Got pros: On pavement, the noise level is quite acceptable. Off-road it behaves remarkably, for its money it goes 100%, sometimes it even surprises that the car has passed. With its cons: At minus values, it becomes dull and loses all its properties, it is not suitable for winter - at all!

Put in the fall of '13 on the UAZ 469. Through the mud (after YAI-357A) Cordiant works wonders! Yes, and in winter on loose and damp snow RIDES !, and how RIDES ! but on the crust it burrows and does not go anywhere . I bled to 0.3 in the mud - it rides wonderfully. There are no problems with the sides. climbed both stumps and ruts. I use 90% off-road (Surveyor). The tires have covered 8000 km. no wear observed. Advice - take it!

Pros
  • Sufficient cross-country ability, light weight, excellent balance (20-25 grams), strong cord, normal price.
Cons
  • In winter, you can kill yourself on ice! Dimension . I would like the 31st .

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I am satisfied, the purchase is quite successful.

There are no competitors at this price. Rubber is only summer, even on a slightly frozen ground it floats like a cow. For unhurried operation in medium filthy conditions. It stands as a summer one on the old Hilux. For 4 years I changed 2 tires, I have to climb all sorts of kakams, I put the same ones. And 2 lie in reserve. Yes, in terms of quality they are far from the same goodrichs, etc. Noisy, poorly balanced, oaky, wear out quickly, sidewalls are weak. But just as approximately excellent…

Pros
  • Cheap, only forward is cheaper, but that one is completely bottom. Good evil tread pattern, looks good. It's not very good on asphalt, on average off-road it's good enough, there are no special claims here.
Cons
  • Poorly balanced, especially after a run of 50 thousand, two will have to be thrown out. the sidewalls are rather weak, it is not always good to get out of the rut, it rows weakly on very bad off-road, it is all the same washed out, I will keep silent about the noise - this is mt after all.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A nice option for the money, one of the best deals.

The main advantage is the price, for such money I will forgive her everything. It crawls well in the mud, soft enough and not very noisy. The wear resistance is very high, the first set (225 / 75R16) departed for 5 years all year round ! Now it costs 275 / 70R16, for the year the wear is almost 0. It also rows perfectly in the snow. Weak to get out of the rut, the lateral lug is almost absent. When driving on sand, it requires caution, because. at the slightest slip, it immediately digs up to…

Pros
  • Price, permeability.
Cons
  • Weak to get out of the rut and on the sand.

The only big BUT, as they say, is that tires are not controllable in winter. Guys, do not drive in the winter on it for more than 90 and everything is ok. Yes, indeed, it is not controllable, and when you press the brake, it goes on like that, but it goes the same way as standard summer tires (factory), so I don’t consider it a minus. Proezdil quietly on it all winter and waiting for dirt. In the mud porridge, it showed itself at 5 +++, I have not tried it in the sands and on clay.

Pros
  • Excellent cross-country ability (just crazy) for NIVA without cutting arches, and there are no modifications, except for reinforced jet rods
Cons
  • not detected, everything is fine.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

Excellent value for money! Very satisfied with both the one and the other. Next winter I will put it again. Different pros: It rows excellently in the snow and leaves the snowdrifts. In winter, I did without studded wheels. I never experienced problems with parking right in the snow. It also drives quite well on a wet road. Some cons: It is worth entering the turns in winter more smoothly so that it does not blow away. In a word, without fanaticism. My Niva accelerates more tightly than if it…

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Unusable to use, bad product.

Was on LR D1, size 225/75 R16 The first hernia appeared 3 months after hitting a curb in the city. Further, the hernias multiplied and budded, especially after off-road exits with hard ground. Result: by the winter on one wheel, a hernia by a third; on the other - 3 hernias the size of a fist or more; the rest are small. In winter it glides - like skates, but digs in the snow (you have to poison it). In general, I didn’t even leave for a year, I put other wheels. When they removed it, it…

Pros
  • Cost and mud protector
Cons
  • Terribly weak sidewalls

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A nice option for the money, one of the best deals.

It is not yet clear what will happen in winter . but I think it is no worse than the average all-season . and I think even better because of the large checkers. In general, the purchase is very satisfied. I regret not buying it sooner. Good, cheap tires for all occasions. : In winter, it is quite normal on packed snow, if you release a little pressure. And on loose snow it rushes better than any winter tires.

Pros
  • The price is two times cheaper than the original. On the highway. I wouldn't be afraid of the word. quiet! Seriously! Before that, AT tires were also cordiant . cordiant 4x4 235/70 / R16 . and so after changing it to 225/75 / R16 MT cordiant off road, the noise did not increase! And mine is even quieter. Grip properties in the mud, I would rate as good. Where before it was necessary to turn on the front end, now it only climbs on the back without any problems. Subjectively no heavier than the previous AT rubber. Objectively - the consumption has not changed in any way. Fairly soft. A/M UAZ Patriot 2.3 TDI Iveco F1A
Cons
  • not rich in size :( It seemed that the rolls in the corners increased a little . but it is understandable, the rubber is softer and the profile is higher, and the width is smaller.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

It was a terrible purchase, but I wasted my money.

Took before the winter of 2022 on the Patriot. Prior to that, four years at the factory Rap Rive . Stock and sun loungers for 80 swallowed and on ZR2022 (No. 60) she was already bald but survived. But the Cordiant Offroad Went away in the winter (well, the snow swallows and does not cough), the spring of ZR2022 (No. 60), the summer . All Four wheels . Sidewalls in hernias . Yes, maybe I have become more aggressive to bumps, pits, curbs . All wheels in the trash. NEVER EVER TAKE OffRoad from…

Pros
  • Inexpensive mudovaya rubber, good raking tread. Normal wear resistance. Quality for cheap!? Or cheap for poor quality.
Cons
  • Small size. Soft, washable. Does not hold ice (as in other matters and other MTs) SIDE! ONE of the numerous hernias burst (internal), Hernias in the sidewall, exfoliate in less than a year. One wheel is already in the trash, I drive without a spare wheel . Miser pays twice,

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good one.

She was on a crocodile. Rode 30,000 km. So I sold it with the car. In winter, on ice with a kaley, I got out 2 times in a ditch (switched sharply from 1st to 2nd gear on a straight line and the car started to turn). At a speed of 15-25 km. H. I'm going to put on the Patriot 275 70 p 16 off road. For hunters and fishermen it is better not to find for the money! For competition, it is rather weak.

Pros
  • Price, design
Cons
  • Erased well 20% dirt, 80% ring road.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Practical product, nothing to complain about.

put it on the Patriot. Departure last summer, mud kneads with a bang! Normal on asphalt. the noise is not disturbing. More than 100 km / h did not drive. In winter there is a problem, you need to go into turns very smoothly and carefully - it blows. On packed snow and ice, it’s just a disaster even with all-wheel drive (there are NO spikes). In the snow and in the field, it rows like a tractor until you sit on your belly. tires are not needed for the city, off-road and country roads for…

Pros
  • Price and permeability
Cons
  • without thorns