Pros
- only used it for 3 days now - so far so good! YayPat Neff
Cons
- The 1st week after changing filter. The water taste nasty Nasty.
ICEPURE PRO NSF 53&42 Certified DA29-00003G Replacement For Samsung DA29-00003B DA29-00003A, Aqua-Pure Plus DA29-00003D DA29-00003F DA97-06317A, HAFCU1, WF289, WSS-1, Refrigerator Water Filter 2PACK Review
7
·
Very good
·
$$
Rating
4.0
🔐 Safes & Safe Accessories, 🔒 Safety & Security
Media
(4)
Photos by authors
(2)
Details
| Material | Coconut Shell,Activated Carbon,Plastic |
|---|---|
| Duration | 6 months |
| External Testing Certification | ANSI, NSF, WQA, IAPMO, RoHS |
| Product Benefits | Removes Pollutants |
| Brand | ICEPURE |
Description of ICEPURE PRO NSF 53&42 Certified DA29-00003G Replacement For Samsung DA29-00003B DA29-00003A, Aqua-Pure Plus DA29-00003D DA29-00003F DA97-06317A, HAFCU1, WF289, WSS-1, Refrigerator Water Filter 2PACK
Authoritative Certifications- NSF/ANSI 53,42 & 372 Lead-Free by NSF, IAPMO, European Food Grade Regulations EC-1935/2016, ROHS, REACH, BPA-Free, TUV and Australian Water Mark. Produced under quality system ISO9001, ISO14000. and under the supervision of the three major American authorities:IAPMO, NSF, WQA. Premium Materials- BPA-free and food-grade plastic. advanced natural coconut shell activated carbon Certified by NSF. Great value for money-It is great way to have a healthy source of chilled water but can do wonders on your budget. Once you start using such a filter, you won’t have to spend money on bottled water, or invest in other water filters as well. We can safely say that this is one very effective refrigerator filter, which will also give you incredible value for your money. High standards- Designed and manufactured under US technology. Produced under the extremely strict quality system ISO9001&ISO14000. and under the supervision of the three major American authorities: IAPMO, NSF, WQA. Longevity- The ICEPURE refrigerator water’s ability to remove contaminants after testing 400 Gallons of water in the laboratory is still 99%. But we highly recommend replace every 6 months or 200 gallons of water filtered. This depend on the water quality and the amount of water being filtered. Lots of users are impressed by its longevity and durability. Compatible Models - DA2900003A, DA2900003B, DA2900003D, DA2900003F, DA2900003G, DA29-00003A-B, TADA29-00003A, TADA29-00003B, DA61-00159, DA61-00159A, DA61-00159A-B, DA97-06317A, HAFCU1/XAA, HAFIN2/EXP, HAFIN2, DA61-159, HAFIN1/EXP, HDX FMS-1, RF268ABRS, RF267AERS, RFG297AARS, RS22HDHPNSR, AQUACREST AQF-DA29-00003G, AQF-DA2900003G, Water drop WD-DA29-00003G, FilterLogic FL-RF11, Waterspecialist WS611B. Fit Models - OnePurify RFC1100A, RFC 1100A, RFC0200A, UpStart Denali Pure WF-DA29-00003G, GLACIER FRESH GF-03G, Refresh R-0003, Waterfall Filter WFC2201, Dista DWF-11, Pure Line PL-700, Crystala CF6, MORE Pure Filters MPF16025, Water Filter Tree WLF-3G, Aqua Fresh WF289, ClearChoice CLCH103, Glacier Water Filters WF-107, PUREPLUS PP-RWF1100A, NuTruFlo NTF-02, PerfectPure PP1003, ALTME WQ-BX-S1, Arrowpure APF-0100, Swift Green Filters SGF-DSB30, Tier1 RWF1010, WaterSentinel WSS-1.
Hide
Pros
- As advertised.
Cons
- Poor Filtering Performance: Some users have reported that this water filter doesn't effectively filter out certain contaminants, such as fluoride, leaving them dissatisfied with its performance
Pros
- This filter fit as described with no leaks. I would buy this product again.
Cons
- Short Lifespan: Despite being marketed as a long-lasting filter, the ICEPURE PRO filter may require frequent replacement due to its relatively short lifespan, adding to long-term costs
Pros
- Not bad sofar
Cons
- It works just like the more expensive name brand filter
Pros
- The filters came fast and the quality is good. Price is very good.
Cons
- Questionable Build Quality
Pros
- They keep my fridges water as purified and fresh as the waters of Lake Minnetonka.
Cons
- Inconsistent Filtering Results
Pros
- Great product and price
Cons
- While this filter is marketed as a cost-effective option, it can be considerably more expensive than other comparable filters, making it a less attractive choice for many consumers
