For a very long time, I deliberated between him, 50 and sigma 50-200, read comments and reviews, the whale irritated me, I even considered selling a camera, constant adjustments in fsh, sad colors, and some frustration and swearing at my "inability" although, as much as I was looking for Yaposhka, I regret it, I run home to "play" learning, to put it another way)....... For the time being, please enjoy the following few examples of photographs: * Be sure to make a purchase! You will be able to

1.4 in terms of the totality of requirements, turned out to be worse and more expensive. Its pros: 4, Some cons: not very pleasant to see her on a fix -There is some vignetting in the open

It’s definitely worth taking, for experience, but it is convenient when shooting indoors. Pros: After the 18-55 whale and the Yangnow 35 and 50mm fixes, no need to adjust it, unlike at least the same Sigma. Different cons: in terms of dd and color rendering, Sharpness is only in ideal conditions, otherwise it loses even to a whale 18-55 then soap is soapy, although for many this is the norm.

I photographed the coin point-blank at an angle of 30 degrees to the coin, brought the focusing current to the center of the coin, it smears a little, Some pros: And everything is fine with me, Cons below:

An excellent fix, I took it to replace the standard 18-55 too, upset me, Different pros: Aperture, I rarely turn on the flash, Price. Cons below:

The price-quality ratio is the best among everything that is produced for Nikon' street portraits, made cool portraits on it without a flash with the light from the window. Has pros: the price for a fast lens is just a fairy tale, Cons: The stabilizer is sometimes not enough, but after a year of use I have no complaints.

Due to a recent purchase and unimportant weather during my leisure time, I have not been able to truly test it yet! Prior to purchasing, I had serious doubts about the focal length of this lens. I had my heart set on an 85mm 1.8G and an 8-16mm Sigma, but both plans fell through))) Every skepticism was dispelled following the purchase! Although the lens is still wide-angle, you may film in practically any genre with it, and all of this can be simply fixed with the same camera! Here are few…

After 18-55, this is heaven and earth! has not yet had time to reveal its full potential, Ru/users/zipixxx/view/741116/?page=3 Some pros: All of the below are correct! excellent lens, assembly, design, everything is on top! Has some cons: I have not yet discovered, although the focus misses sometimes, but I have already learned to cope with it.

Don't go for expensive zooms, especially if you' Some pros: great picture, The price is ridiculous for such a result. Cons:

in good lighting during the day it shoots well, but indoors 30% of the marriage in focus, so shoot only after triple confirmation of the focus

50, 50, and 50 It is very convenient to shoot - as you see with your eyes, but when I got used to it, the percentage of defects is no more than 5-10%, making this glass the undisputed world champion in terms of price. I took 35 Optimal focal length (52mm on my D5100), excellent image sharpness and detail, good open bokeh - made this lens my standard lens.

I recommend it to all beginners, After the purchase, I already discovered a 50mm lens with manual iris control, in any case - 35mm is a necessary thing. Some pros: this is a "must have" Has some cons: Haven' if you can imagine it?!

I took this glass to replace the regular 18-55 VR, on the D3000 camera, as I put it, I don’ the focus is not fast but it does not slow down either :) In my opinion, Has pros: 1 hence: short shutter speeds and "bokeh" The percentage of lenses with back focus is much less than, say, 50mm 1.4G AF-S, Sharp, you can shoot constantly from 1.8, but HA are of course significant (sometimes the lens hood helps, but I note - sometimes)), less noticeable with f 2.8 High resolution glass, peaking at f4…

A sickly compact UNIVERSAL fix from the must-have category, don’t hesitate to buy, it’s worth your money) photo from him Got pros: I decided to write a review after a serious "acquaintance" with the fix, it's stupid to say it, but it's 35, which means a universal focal length - you can take a picture of almost everything, 1.8 holes are enough, compared it with a colleague 50 1.4 and took 35 Cons: Ho on it is wild, often there are "defective" specimens with back / front focus, be careful…

A must have for every owner of a cropped Nikon camera! since then I have bought / sold / is as it was, and is, and I'm not going to part with it. Pros: Bayonet fastening - metal. Got cons: there are no front / back focuses on my copy, so I almost always trust autofocus.

Very good lens, so in general its setting to full frame is a pleasant surprise, and there is nothing to complain about. Different pros: contrasty, the vignetting turns out to be non-criminal, it is easily removed in Lightroom, for example. With its cons: After reporter zooms (17-35, 12-24),

For a beginner amateur photographer with a DX camera, despite the vignetting, 35mm f 1.8g af-s dx nikkor Has some pros: - Sharp in moderation - not bad for portraits (especially half-length ones) crop - approx. 52 mm) - Compact - convenient when traveling, hiking, - Cheap. Cons: - Chromatic aberrations in contrasting areas of the frame, increasing towards the edges (corrected in editors) - Autofocus sometimes misses, not strictly speaking portrait,

aberrations climbed out in all the places that were possible, they were not corrected by the software and were very annoying.

excellent lens from the category of "must have" the viewing angle becomes a la "fifty kopecks", so you can look at the world through the eyes of our dads and grandfathers :) Well built,

The sharpness of this glass is better than 50 mm 1.8 G, Whoever talks about misses, its flu is 1 Whoever talks about what he thinks, I consider him an excellent staffer for crop.