I took it from my brother for a vacation at sea and realized that I wanted another photo, no stabilizer, it lubricates on zoom, the sun shines on the display and nothing is visible without a viewfinder, switching modes in the menu is not very convenient. I have an old soap dish Canon Power Shot A430 faster and the pictures are always clear, the choice of modes is a wheel. Now I bought myself a new one, of course it cannot be compared with the Nikon Coolpix L810, mine is three times more…

After a long search for a camera, I settled on this one. I bribed the mind. Didn't regret it for a minute. I didn’t notice the slowness when photographing, which is written in the reviews. Macro photography is amazing. photos are clear and bright. I chose batteries. On vacation, I constantly took photos and videos. Batteries with such intensive use last for 2 days. I mean quality, expensive batteries. The camera is neat, it is pleasant to hold it in hands. It is convenient that the Capture…

In fact, this is an entry-level device with good magnification. I do not advise taking, because. the device allows you to shoot only by selecting the appropriate scene setting, which takes place in automatic mode and is not always successful. In manual mode, all the same automatic settings are involved, only they are selected at the discretion of the device with the ability to configure ISO, which is of little importance in this device, and a couple more candy wrappers. As already mentioned…

Today I bought this animal. Before that, there were canon / nikon soapboxes, and nikon d80-d90 DSLRs. Bought after reading the reviews but decided to take a chance. The animal pleasantly surprised me with the quality of shooting, and I can’t say that the shooting speed is low. Even with the d80, I got used to the fact that you can’t shoot indoors on a 1.8 lens under any conditions, so I was ready for graininess on the automatic indoors. People, what to expect, matrices like cameras for 100…

Took to replace the old sony dsc-h5 2022 release. And he deeply regretted it. Comparing the quality of pictures with a mobile phone characterizes this model very accurately. Those who praise this device, obviously, did not hold high-quality equipment in their hands, and perhaps they did not see a high-quality photograph. I do not recommend taking. Money thrown away.

There are not too many pseudo-reflex cameras on the market in this price category, which, in terms of a set of parameters, could compete with this camera. Has some pros Consumes batteries economically. Excellent macro photography. Good dynamic range of semi-tones, good sensitivity of the matrix. Most importantly, a very nice wide-angle lens, all the necessary subjects fit easily into the frame. A 4 GB memory card was already included. Got cons: The lens cap dangles on a string, can get into the

the camera has many shortcomings, so I can not advise other people to buy this model Pros below: two approximates are built into the camera at once (on the left and on the right). It is very convenient. The auto shooting and time reporting mode is inserted (if there is no one to take pictures of me, I can use this camera). Long work without recharging Cons: Enough. 1. You have to close and open the camera lens manually 2. Evening time of day photos are terrible 3. At maximum zoom, the camera

The video is written in 4GB files (29 minutes), which is enough if you are not going to shoot a feature film)) An excellent camera in terms of price and quality, the only competitor is the BenQ GH700. Many people write that there are few manual settings, but I think that this camera is for those who are not particularly versed in the secrets of photography, but want to get decent photos and decent video. My first Olympus digital camera (6 megapixels, 3x zoom, video 320x240), now Nikon, in…

The camera was presented (as it was said * one friend of the photographer recommended * - tear off the hands of such photographers) I myself go in for quite a specific active sport (I also photograph accordingly as far as possible) and the camera does not fit at all - without a flash, the shots are worse than a Chinese phone, the flash helps a little when shooting a moving object - but you can’t always use the flash. Focusing is terrible just 3-15 seconds . The quality of the picture is at the

The fotik is wonderful. We must not forget that this is a "soap box", but at the same time there are so many pleasant things in it. No need to compare it with DSLRs - this is incorrect. After Canon PowerShot - the quality of photos is pleasantly pleasing. Personally, I am very satisfied with the purchase. Has some pros Price Small dimensions Decent functionality for a "soap dish" Zumm was very impressed Macro - really liked the result Video with stereo sound Comfortable ergonomics. With

at first everything was super speed, quality. but after half a year the kapets began ! my computer simply doesn’t see the camera, so there’s no point in taking pictures - you can’t look at the computer anyway. Charging runs out very quickly, especially in the cold. There is no point in buying it. now you can find with this quality and even better - ordinary soap dishes. and if you still want a professional one, then take a professional one. This camera is a waste of both money and nerves. I

I used it for several months, photographed before that with different compact soap dishes, the quality was more pleasing than on this copy, I tried various settings. Slow, until it focuses, you get tired of waiting, and then it takes a photo for about a second, it’s heavy, and plus it terribly stretches the edges of the photo, if your face, God forbid, hit the edge of the photo, be sure it will be crooked or elongated to the side. and on top of that, the other day, for no apparent reason, the…

First of all, I love blue. It is very sweet. Lots of compliments on the looks. It's heavier than my other cameras, so getting used to it was a bit more difficult. It comes with a choker but after a while it gets uncomfortable so I usually wear it with a lanyard wrapped around my wrist so I don't drop it. So far this has worked well. Performance: Takes great close-up shots. Very clear and precise. I have the settings set to max (16MP "star", bright color). The 26x zoom is also a nice feature. I…

First impression: Great looks and lots of customization options, oh my! Out of the box this camera looked quite capable, which is what I was expecting as I already had a Nikon as my main camera. Side zoom, a dedicated capture button are great extras and an opening sidebar, there it is, a mini HDMI that can spit your 3D photos out to the right device. Wow! Design and Body: Nikon made it look like a DSLR, like many cameras in this class, to be able to have a big zoom and more, well, everything…

I bought the L810 in August 2012 (about a year ago) so had quite a bit of time to try it out. This was my first camera upgrade since using Nikon's $100 base models like the P60 and L28 (although my very first was the Kodak Easy Share). Pros: I chose the blue camera. The color is rich and I haven't had any major problems with chipping. My cameras follow me everywhere so he's been through a lot and is holding up pretty well. I dropped it once (only about 3 months ago) and it only survived a…