Great lens! The photos are just WOW! I have it on the 650D and I have already worked one wedding with him and have no regrets. Assembly at the highest level. As for the yellowness, I personally did not notice, and in Photoshop it's easy to fix if anything. At the extreme points, my copy works well. I am very happy with the purchase! This lens has become my favorite))

I came to buy sigma after a year of active shooting at 700d + 17-55. For a long time I was asking the price of the full frame, believing that I would not get more from the crop than I had. That is, everything went approximately within the framework set by Canon marketers. "17-55 seems like a great lens, seems to be sharp enough, well, a little flimsy, but I'm not a pro, I shoot for my own pleasure, I get excellent shots for a family album, there seems to be no reason to worry," I thought. Then,

Previously, I had experience of communicating with Sigmas and they did not leave any positive emotions in my memory. I don’t know why, but during the next change of optics (in search of perfection) I fell for marketing and advertising, I decided to order this lens. Well what can I say. He is cool. Really cool. Damn cool! And I say this, a person who has shot almost the entire line of canon electric zooms and primes (with the exception of exotic 500mm, 1200mm, etc.) In general, I was…

Tested in the store. I wanted to change my Tamron 15-30 2.8 to this Sigma. I wore it on 1D Mark 3, on crop 1.3 with an open aperture it gives a strong vignette at 18-24, at 35 it is no longer visible. Sharpness pleased. There is a known compatibility problem with the new Canon 70d carcasses and others, but for some reason people scold Sigma, not Canon. I will take for 40d. Tamron is too big and heavy.

For older cameras or videographers a great option. Not suitable for photographers with a modern crop, you can put it on ff, but why a wild vignette? There were sigma art on the mic, they worked flawlessly. I bought a canon 35 is and was amazed - the marriage disappeared, in general, it always removes everything. I sold all the sigmas - like a nightmare of the past now. They told me that they only bought native optics - but I heard enough of corrupt reviewers who drove synthetic tests, or, well,

When I read that Sigma is preparing this lens (and I read this news on April 1), I thought it was such a joke! )) The lens turned out to be amazing (despite the small range of focal lengths and the lack of a rope for the cover)))! It is sharp, very sharp starting straight from 1.8! No focusing issues. Always right on target (both 650D and 70D). Sufficiently contrasting, neither yellow nor bluish;) All the lenses that had previously fallen into my hands were a compromise of characteristics…

As soon as this lens appeared, I decided that I would buy it. Before him, there was already a 35mm f / 1.4 fix from sigma. I like luminosity. Focuses fairly accurately. In mixed and poor lighting, there are more misses. On an open cut. In general, I am satisfied with this lens, I shoot mostly landscapes or group portraits with it when I need a wide angle. Sigma's Art series is successful.

I bought the lens through the official store (PCT), after long wanderings around the Internet, in search of a universal fast lens for crop (Canon eos 70D). A month later, I handed it over to the service center, as it smears at 100%, moreover, either at "+" or at "-", without any regularity, I tried both auto and manual, in general I tried all modes, only when focusing on Live View can achieve great results, but it's slow and drains your battery. The service said that it is possible to solve the

Taking into account the fact that there is always glamor in the form of blur on a hole up to 8, you have to shoot group portraits, full-length portraits, and even partly half-length portraits by holding the hole tightly. At hole 8, the depth of field is about the same at 2.8 in the usual sense. When shooting a street flash on dimly lit streets, the situation is similar, only the subject in the center of the frame is sharp. BB walks from exposure and tends to go yellow. I tested this glass for…

Without ulterior motives - the best lens for a crop camera! In the FF translation, focal lengths are 28.8 - 56mm, the most popular for me. Tell me what kind of zoom can still give such focal lengths with a constant hole of 1.8 per crop? For video, it is indispensable due to the ability to smoothly zoom the frame at a constantly open aperture. Very convenient to use on the new Canon mirrorless cameras due to the crop mode. If there is a super 35 camera - the same. If there was still a stub in…

USB Dock will save a lot of time and nerves instead of going to the alignment service. You can set not just corrections for WIDE-TELE, but also intermediate zoom positions, and even different distances. It's just incredible. After spending a day or two, you can very, very accurately fit the glass. Combined with the 70D, regular phase and LV combo AF produce very similar results. LV, of course, is more accurate and stable, with almost no misses in principle. I was worried from reviews that…

Very, very decent aperture zoom, for a crop it’s generally a fairy tale! The Art series is still good. Sharp already from 1.8, did not expect. Alignment was not required, possibly depending on the instance and on the camera. I read a lot that there was a problem with 70d, on my 7d it got up like a native. The design is good - nothing, as they say, does not rub, does not press, does not pinch) Not a bokeh monster, but draws beautifully. Yes, for someone heavy, but it depends on what to compare…

I really did not expect such new lenses from Sigma. Sigma lenses are now divided into three categories A (Art), C (Contemporary), S (Sport). With article Art the best in the line. Quality in everything! The reorganization of the company was beneficial. Let's hope that Sigma will continue to please us with such good products for a reasonable price :) For those who are interested, you can read all + and - here. http://www. The-digital-picture. Com/Reviews/Sigma-18-35mm-f-1.8-DC-HSM-Lens. Aspx…

I chose between Canon 17-40 f4L and Canon 17-55 f2.8 IS and of course Sigma. Before buying, I carefully tested all the lenses and concluded that even if Sigma cost 50,000. I would still choose her. When I compared it with 17-40, I literally immediately realized that 17-40 was complete slag not worthy of a red ribbon. Sigma at 1.8 shows greater sharpness than 17-40 at f4. In general, comrades, to say that I was shocked is nothing to tell But from 17-55 there were little doubts, I thought if I

Allows you to hide the mess in the background by blurring at quite decent distances to the object. I am completely discouraged by the fact that on the 5.6 hole the lens is really darker than the initial whales, almost half a stop. If they just need to shoot without blurring, then on normal apertures you have to greatly lengthen the shutter speed, on a cloudy day on a 5.6 hole you have to set shutter speeds to 1/30 in the same place where 1/80 is enough for 35 2.0.

Pretty good lens for cropped cameras. In conjunction with 70d, it smears in focus through the viewfinder. The picture is not bad, sharp, fast and suitable for video. A good drawing in the dark, if desired, they can photograph the Milky Way. The rubber band on the zoom ring fell off after a year of use. Great for landscape hdr, ihdr. I don't like the 70d skinton in conjunction with this lens. Perhaps this is a problem of the carcass, not the lens.

It’s stupid to write about weight and price - it goes without saying that it’s heavy and not cheap, In terms of execution - I thought only the fuji technique can bring me to ecstasy . but they tried in sigma)) I bought it new - they took it out of the box, from wardrobe trunk - there is a slight presence of oil on it, and the smell of oil, everything turns smoothly, the metal cools the hand, mmm, buzz. 1.8 is quite a working aperture, but I prefer to close down to 2.5 if there is enough light…

Half a year considered to buy. After reading all the reviews, there were many doubts, especially the front and back focus were frightening. But in the end I decided to take a chance. The lens was not available in my city, I had to order it through an online store. The lens is chic, such sharpness at an open aperture, a very juicy picture. Minimum distortion, very natural reproduction of colors and midtones. Before that, 4 years passed with 50mm, and the difference is simply colossal. On my…

I’ll make a reservation right away, my carcass is 70d, but it’s not just the incompatibility of the carcass and the lens. Unfortunately, I can't mention any of the advantages! So I'll write everything else. 1. The lens never focuses on the face and under no circumstances, you put a central point, but he doesn’t see it, it seems that the lens simply doesn’t understand the camera settings, for a long time I couldn’t understand the reason why it doesn’t finish it, then it interrupts, but on the…