Review on Gislaved Nord Frost 200 205/55 R16 94T winter by Danuta Kowalska ᠌

235/45-18xl. I took 8.6 for a tire. The machine is front-wheel drive 190 forces. I will compare it with the khaka 8 235/50-18, which served for 7 years and was given away with the previous car during the sale - a rear-wheel drive sedan with 215 hp. Hake I gave 4 points, and it really was a great rubber. So, the advantages of gislavel in comparison with khaka are silence and softness. It rows a little better in the snow, on hack 8 I periodically got stuck in the parking lot, so I carried a shovel. quieter on bare pavement - few spikes and a soft sidewall. Hence the minus of the gislaved - at the end of winter two wheels were pierced. I had to buy 2 new tires already at 9.6 apiece, and the production of 2022, not Germany. It was possible to do all kinds of lewdness on a hack in the winter, a gislaved is not suitable for this - rubber for a leisurely ride. Gislaved is slightly better on bare pavement, but the winter was snowy, so it was not possible to feel the benefits. On the ice, there is no gislaved. If this is not very noticeable during acceleration, then a dozen meters win by braking the hack. Will I buy another gislaved - no. You can drive, but carefully and only on good roads without holes.