Review on Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens - Compatible with Canon DSLR Cameras (Lens Only) by Bujang'e Lor Nganim ᠌

When using a cropped carcass, the lens provides acceptable results for shooting video. You are able to zoom in and out without any aperture jumps while you are using a constant aperture. Focal lenses are quite comfortable - from wide to portrait lens. Nevertheless, once you start utilizing it in a photograph, all of the benefits become null and void. Landscape painters are likely to be dissatisfied due to the lack of sharpness in the image. When the picture is taken from the top down, the trunk slides out by itself (after a month of use). A friend was persuaded otherwise, but in the end, he was nonetheless bred for sale in the shop. I can make cropping comparisons with the Sigma 17-70 2.8-4 Macro due to its counterparts. The degree of acuteness is 1.5 times more than before. Although it was the same material, the trunk performed as expected even after it had been used for four months. To answer your question, the answer is yes; the variable aperture ratio does not work well for everyone when shooting video (although I personally do not use zoom when shooting video). Yet, the depth of field is far greater, the sharpness is significantly improved, and the cost is almost three times less. In addition to that, there is a cap included in the kit. Choose the 24-105 f/4L lens if you think you might move up to a full frame camera at some point in the future. It is available at a lower price than this cropped 17-55, has a greater build quality, is equally as sharp, has a constant aperture, and comes with a hood and case as standard equipment. For the remaining aspects, it is recommended that an additional Samyang width be utilized.