Review on Nikon D5500 Kit AF-P DX 18-55mm F/3.5-5.6G VR, black by Mateusz Banaszkiewic ᠌

That is not something I would recommend purchasing because the only difference between it and a soap dish is that it has interchangeable lenses, which at least in some way save the device. I'm not a professional, but even I can see that there aren't nearly enough additional buttons that would make the process go more quickly. I didn't like the controls. With its positives being: For the New Year, I decided to give my wife this camera because, at the time, she had just started working in the photography department and there was not a lot of money available to buy a full frame. What I can say about the camera is that it is really very small in size, it has an excellent swivel screen with cool colors, and it is made very soundly. This earns it a score of plus. Nothing has peeled off or damaged in any location despite the fact that it has been used frequently for about a year. Around 20,000 photographs were taken. Autofocus is one of the drawbacks, as it is clumsy and was designed for photographing still subjects in a controlled environment at a leisurely pace. I believe that it could be useful for academic purposes, but I would not use it in business. The 18-55 kit lens that came with the camera produced results that were not particularly impressive. A new 50mm 1.8G lens was ordered as a replacement. The absence of a "screwdriver" is one of the downsides to this product (trust me, this is a very important thing that will save you a lot of money). For instance, for the same amount of money, I could get a 50mm 1.4D lens, which is significantly more portable. After then, the quality of the photographs gradually improved, but the camera continued to have trouble focusing properly. Just on a constant basis. It was a little frustrating to deal with. While the photographs used in the composition were excellent, it is difficult to understand why the focus was not placed where it should have been in the final product. After a year of suffering, it was finally put up for sale. Everyone talks about a cool matrix with good colors, and a resource such as DRL places it in first place among the amateur matrices in first place. One thing clicked for me, and from this point on, I won't buy a device based on ratings from websites; rather, I'll make my decision only after conducting a comprehensive analysis of the RAW data I've obtained from shooting. One could take a supported ff for this amount of money, which is something I would unquestionably do given the circumstances described above. If you set anything incorrectly, you will get g * amno. If you set everything as it should, you will get a little better and you will not be "very" upset by the result. But now I definitely know what characteristic I need and why I need it, because this camera disciplines very well. If you set something incorrectly, you will get g * amno. I also came to the conclusion that purchasing a new camera is not necessary because the majority of the money is still being spent on marketing rather than on developing a good and high-quality camera; to illustrate this point, I compared it to a Nikon d3s that was purchased after this device and has an experience level of 8 years =). I wish everyone success, and as a parting thought, I'd suggest picking up valuable lessons from the experiences of others, since doing so will be far more cost effective.