Review on Robot vacuum cleaner Roborock S6/T6, white by Barbara Krakowiak ᠌

The vacuum cleaner uses up 18% of the battery and 30 minutes on 35 square meters. The application includes cleaning statistics, including total cleaning time, cleaned square footage, and launches. For two weeks, I experienced a bug where, when sent from the application, the charged robot drove off the base by a meter, got a little confused, claimed that the cleaning was finished, and then returned home. However, when I sent it to the room I intended, it completed the cleaning but then became disoriented and was unable to locate the base. It didn't occur once again. It appears that they advise against wearing it while using your hands because the application requires manual control. They advise against setting modes higher than "standard" for regular cleaning because, with a clogged filter, there is a chance that, after a certain amount of time (anti-record - 30 hours), you will need to replace the vacuum cleaner fan because, in the event of overload, the rotor is drawn to the base and begins to rub and melt. In order to shake out the dust and routinely replace the filter, I set myself to the "standard" setting. On surface floors (laminate, tiles), the vacuum cleaner works great (of course, subject to daily wet cleaning – I'm talking about myself), and because there are no carpets, I can't speak to how well it cleans those. The vacuum machine occasionally lifts the chairs and the table, although this happens far less frequently than with my previous robot vacuum cleaner. The MiHome application displays a map of the residence with the robot's travel path indicated on it with a delay of about five seconds. The robot carefully navigates around obstacles as it rides in parallel lines throughout the remaining space after passing over the contour of the room close to the walls and furnishings. Although I detest shine, it plays no specific part in this scene because the robot is virtually always seen standing silently in a corner while charging. I noticed recommendations to treat it lightly with antistatic, but I haven't taken the risk yet because the antistatic might suddenly harm the lidar or other sensors.