Review on Vacuum cleaner KARCHER VC 3, yellow by Mateusz Maycha ᠌
Disgusting quality, impossible to use.
5. At first, when I bought this vacuum cleaner, it was very inconvenient to shake out the dust. I ure you, my hands are straight, but the first many times I always had dust on the floor, although, starting from the second time, I tried to do it very carefully. This process of shaking out really pissed me off. The container is small (this, by the way, is not a direct minus, I just used to have larger ones), but somehow it turns out that it is more difficult to clean than my previous large bowls. 6. In general, I think that reviews in which there are the words "quiet", "powerful", advertising "HEPA", premium'a, consultants, a lot of technical details, i. E. almost everything with a score > 3 is promotional Because I didn’t really like vacuuming the carpet with this brush, for the main cleaning I use a turbo brush, which I had left from the previous Samsung. "Positives" also advertise turbo brushes from LG (and, of course, premium). Of course, I don’t know how bad all the modern compeors of this vacuum cleaner are, but I don’t recommend this one. Of course, I heard something about the dyson, but it's in some parallel universe from me, a vacuum cleaner for 20-40k. Every day, I now have a Chinese robot being cleaned, which copes with the task with a bang, every day, according to the schedule, it collects a bunch of garbage.
- Basically vacuuming. 700W is, of course, economical, but the vacuum cleaner is weak because the entire text didn’t fit into the cons and comments (something broke through me, although I rarely write reviews), I’ll start here: Oh those marketers. Well, honestly, it's very hard to read reviews now, because most of them are promotional. Bosch, tifal, philips, this Karcher . The guys from Samsung have more real reviews (above), because. the brand is more popular, there are a huge number of buyers, it is difficult to deal with them (but also, the old models, the marketing support of which was stopped, have an overall rating lower than modern ones). Although . maybe it's already such a personal schizophrenia that I have developed. I would rate the vacuum cleaner itself at two and a half, but I put one in order to slightly adjust the overall rating. For those 4.7 points that he has here on the i. Market, he did not even close. Further I will compare with my previous Samsung, tk. nothing more. Model SC4740, bought for 2560r at the end of 2022 (but in dollars of the 2022-2022 sample, this is probably 4-5 thousand as it is now). I bought this one for 6875 in April 2022 (just looked it up, it costs 10k! People, come to your senses! You shouldn’t buy it for 5 thousand, let alone for ten. ) 1. Suction. It is VERY weak! The remaining paragraphs can not be read, in principle. If you check not by applying a brush to the carpet, but by taking a pipe and putting your hand to it, then this is noticeably weaker than that of my previous Samsung, on the body of which 1800W was written. Of course, 700W for a vacuum cleaner is interesting, but I would prefer to increase the power to 1400W, but so that it better.
- 2. The brush is designed in such a way that it really sticks to the carpet and (slightly less) to the floor. But this is achieved by the fact that it has few "slots" around the perimeter, as a result: firstly, the vacuum cleaner does not vacuum up small debris that is next to the brush, and this is very very inconvenient, because. often the brush cannot get where the debris is and you have to remove it to up the debris just with a pipe secondly, as I understand it, such a “vacuum” between the brush and the carpet does not draw in the very dust that is on the carpet very well, and if there are “slits”, strong air flows are created there that blow the dust away from the place, and then, with the main flow, it goes into the pipe. Or, there is another way to explain it. In any case, I did a simple experiment: I vacuumed my Ikea toilet rug, okay, I vacuumed it several times. Then he took this rug in his hand and knocked it out with the other hand. There was a lot of dust, clubs. Earlier with Samsung, there was dust, but it was many times less. Frequent advertising of a valve on a pipe for "positives", which additionally reduces power, is generally nonsense. 3. Even "positives" were written about a short cord. I have a studio apartment and before I could vacuum it almost without plugging the outlet. Now I'm vacuuming with an extension cord. An extension cord for general cleaning, in principle, is normal for me, but one particular personal case of mine infuriates me: often at the table (near the table) a child can crumble food, bread, I immediately take a vacuum cleaner so as not to carry it around the apartment, but before that I always [since I already took the vacuum cleaner in my hands] at the same time spent a couple of times with a brush in the corridor, in which almost always a little dirt remains from the shoes, and now you can’t get it =( 4. The vacuum cleaner, in principle, is small, but it takes up noticeably more space than my previous Samsung of the same size. no vertical parking. For storage, I began to disemble (well, in the sense I unfasten the hose and pipe, I put it separately). This is very uncomfortable. After buying a vacuum cleaner, I began to use a broom many times more often. Well, because it's faster and more convenient!
