Sony E-Mount 55-210mm F/4.5-6.3 Lens for Sony E-Mount Cameras with PixiBytes Microfiber Cleaning Cloth (Black) - Bundle Deal Review

I've been making use of it for almost three years, and I intend to keep making use of it. The benefits include it being affordable, lightweight, pleasant, and reliable. I put it to use when photographing people on the street as well as things that are further away than one hundred meters. The ideal ratio of cost to caliber of product or service. accompanied by the fact that they are not present here. Naturally favors days with bright sunlight and little cloud cover since, for such a price, the…

This lens has a focal length of 1 meter and brings very close even when folded. So it is only suitable for outdoor use. But I had 16-50 with my camera, so I use it for shooting indoors. It is also advisable to buy a (55-210) UV filter for it.

After the regular one, I bought a sigma 30 / 1,4 and did not know grief, I wanted other focal ones. After him, all the lenses are terribly soapy, I don’t know how to live on.

Non-alternative autofocus budget telephoto lens for Nex. Works well in macro with the Rainox DCR attachment.Considering the price, the score is excellent. Examples of photos in the album "Sony sel 55-210"

Several advantages, including a stylish design, a durable metal body, and high image quality. Smart AF, good stabilizer! Cons: Very particular about the light, and autofocus performance suffers when it's cloudy outside.

With its pros. Lightweight, fits comfortably in the hand, looks great on the carcass, good focal lengths. Its cons: Strongly lathers along the edge of the frame, strongly pronounced vignette.

with advantages. Stylish, light, comfortable, and with very good image quality. Cons:\sDark. Slow autofocus that occasionally rustles for three seconds. Bright contrast images reveal chromatic distortions at maximum zoom.

Some pros: An excellent lens for shooting large objects. For a beginner, complete with a standard out of the box fit perfectly. Portraits, animals, flowers - are perfect. Got cons: I use it as my main. Perhaps a professional will find flaws. As a newbie, I haven't noticed yet.

The only cropped telezoom in the E system is content with the average picture quality in all modes, the affordable pricing, and the lightweight design. It performs as it should, neither better nor worse, for the money. An essential upgrade to 16-50mm Pros is required because there isn't a better one. 1) Excellent sharpness at all focal lengths with one or two stops of coverage 2) Sonev picture's clarity, correctness, and surgical technicality 3) Elegant construction and design 4) Superb…

Overall, a telephoto lens that is perfectly ordinary, well-built, and offers excellent value. Of course, under Sony E there are pricier, fancier, high-aperture, and pin-cut variants available, but the majority of unskilled users won't notice any significant variations from the budget-friendly 55-210. with advantages. * High-quality and constructive, as with most Sony lenses. The sharpness is exceptional, and the image is lovely and natural with no "ringing details," feeling like a fine…

It was obtained less than a month ago in order to enable remote shooting of objects. It handles its responsibilities capably, the autofocus on my Sony a6000 camera works flawlessly, and there are no issues regardless of the lighting conditions. In general, the lens can be considered the best zoom for the money that is compatible with the E mount (purchased sold for 6490r) Several advantages, such as: high quality build; good picture; rather harsh; sufficient compactness for such a zoom range…

An intriguing and important lens for the system, not just for taking pictures of far-off objects. It was tried in Sevastopol and is required for travel as a second lens. Yet if you require a prompt response, this is not the case. I collected 7400 pieces of paper without a box. There was no dust inside or outside, the flight was typical, and this price is more than acceptable for him. different benefits Nicely constructed and enjoyable to work with. Small and light for a focal length. When…

I had high hopes for this lens, but the test shots I took weren't that sharp. I knew at 4.5-6.3 it was the best it could be. Maybe I got a bad copy because it had great reviews. However, this didn't work for me. Choosing the Sony 18-105 f4 G lens The search continues

I love photographing my pets in motion and based on the reviews I decided to try this lens. I wanted to go one step further than my kit lens. The day was sunny so I took some test shots. I left with a set of decent pictures. I've posted a few examples for people interested in the lens.

I'm just starting out in photography but I'm an electrical engineer and I work with a lot of electronics. The build quality is good and the photos look great to me. As a newbie to photography, I'm unfamiliar with all this fancy terminology and I'm probably overlooking some of the flaws that a pro would spot, but I really like this lens.

I bought this lens hoping it would take decent photos. I am more than happy with this product as it has been changed many times and almost everyone who has seen the lens and camera together has told me that it looks very professional. I don't really care how it looks, more what it does and how the images come out. I was able to take some great photos of distant wildlife and waterfalls as well as landscape shots. The optical steady shot is amazing. I'm very happy with how it performs as a lens…