- Great photos and videos, fast camera brains, detachable flash, compact size, great display, SD card support, tips for beginners, great price compared to competitors (Olympus, Panasonic)
- A dead battery (2-3 discharge-charge cycles give almost nothing), there is no optical viewfinder (it would make it possible to save battery power), the camera heats up, and what will happen in the summer? (charge for compactness), an inconvenient menu (you constantly have to return to the main menu for important settings), loses to full-size DSLRs in autofocus speed, Memory Stick memory card
- Cool camera! I bought myself a pink color, it is so cheerful :) Photos and videos are beautiful, the lens I took 18-55mm suits me perfectly.
- not to say that the fluff is by weight, but this does not bother me. It's just that his "scene" modes are not ideal, but I don't care, I shoot most often on P or on the intelligence of the photo.
- Small size, high ISO, convenient screen, good video (and it compresses well on the fly), separate flash (this is a plus for me, because I don’t need it at all in this device).
- An uncomfortable handle, a very uncomfortable shutter button, a noisy matrix, an unswitchable shutter sound, a terrible-looking "pancake" with an uncomfortable lid.
- A small and relatively inexpensive camera that combines the advantages of compact cameras (contrast autofocus - accurate and allows you to work in video mode, relatively small size, many program modes) and DSLRs (interchangeable lenses, large and very low-noise matrix with an operating ISO of up to 3200, ease of control for IPIG).
- Weak battery, not very high quality native optics ("soaps" in the corners), non-standard connector for accessories. Sometimes the viewfinder is not enough: framing on the screen is not so convenient. The menus and controls in general look confusing and not very fast.
- Everything has already been written about them. I took it as a notebook - after all, a medium-format camera weighing 2 kg is always hard to carry with you. NEX-3 is ideal for long trips, hiking in the mountains…
- Ergonomics is not thought out - a small uncomfortable handle, like soap dishes with a retractable lens. But after all, it would never occur to anyone to remove the lens in order to put the camera in a trouser pocket. Why is she so flat then? It would be more logical to make a normal, grippy handle, like, for example, the Sony Cyper-shot DSC-F828 (Sony's best camera in terms of ergonomics) or the Nikon Coolpix L100. And put in it a larger and more powerful battery. The camera menu is generally a separate song. This one's for the "what-where-when" lovers.
- size, image quality, good creative modes
- expensive lenses, flash does not turn up, weak battery
- The quality of shooting and video is superb. Stylish, unusual, eye-catching appearance. Accessible menu and tips, the ability to be creative.
- Manual zoom, which on my model is only three times, the flash does not always work, only when it is very dark. In the evening, the camera can rely on its own strength without a flash, but I still haven’t figured out how to make it shoot with a flash (without automatics). Well, the battery drains quickly.
- Compact; Easy; Sufficiently nimble; Ability to use different lenses; Beautiful:)
- Color rendition, but this is to the lens; Focusing accuracy, strange as it sounds for contrast autofocus;
- Really great matrix. A bunch of adapters for any glass.
- Size - the camera is relevant only with glass 18-55, and this is far from compact. Not good for reporting.
- Pretty light, quick-firing (although I don’t shoot a lot of series), sharpness
- Price, settings through the menu. The lens cap was immediately lost.