Black Canon CanoScan LiDE400 Document Scanner for Improved SEO Review

After installation on Windows X Pro, the software was "lost" in an incomprehensible place and access to it for configuration could not be found. It opens in auto mode only when connected to a working computer via a USB port. The documentation consists of huge, repeatedly folded paper "footcloths" that are replete with security warnings in different languages ​​and other protocol nonsense. As for the features of working with software and the correct installation of the necessary parameters, then

I am satisfied with the scanner - the only negative is described in the shortcomings, but it is solved. I took old family photos for digitization - I've already scanned several hundred - I'm satisfied with the quality. As an example, in the photo - the cover of the book, scanned as a picture and as a pdf - highlighted the text on it.

I bought this scanner today and was disappointed. Before that, I used an old, old Epson Stylus Photo TX650 MFP to scan photos (this is not an advertisement, you can’t buy it anywhere for a long time). The quality suited me, but an MFP is an MFP, you can’t take it anywhere with you, it takes up a lot of space and weighs decently. But it turned out that the scan quality of the new scanner is much worse. Compared to photography, it feels like I used to shoot with a DSLR, but now I switched to a…

I bought this scanner for use at home, mainly for scanning and sending documents. So far, the scanner has done an excellent job with this task. Has pros: 1) Scan quality 2) Easy to connect 3) Small dimensions 4) Acceptable price Cons: The construction of the scanner itself feels rather flimsy, but it's hard to expect anything else at this price.

Bought for home, because. often needed, very satisfied with the performance of the scanner, perfect for our needs, namely, sending documents

I bought the product in the M. Video store (in April 2022 - order 96784214). Designed by self-delivery from the store at Hong Kong, Svobodny pr-t, 33, Trade House "Perovsky". The guys quickly arranged and issued the goods. The store checked the appearance of the scanner - there were no questions to it. Advice for those who are planning to buy it! Fragile cover for scanning, so make sure that he finds himself a place in your house, where food, reams of papers, mugs, laptops, etc. will not be…

Has pros: A good unit. Plugged it in, registered it and it works. I took it to work with text documents, everything suits. Has cons: I thought that I would manage through the interface from the computer screen with the possibility of settings . this is not

I purchased this scanner to scan rare stickers. Sadly, the scanner leaves behind artifacts in the form of vertical stripes that make it appear as though the image is not a whole but rather is composed of stripes. The stripes pass through around 865 pixels at 1200 dpi resolution. I emailed Canon Support with a question. while awaiting a response. Artifact photos are included.

No matter how beautiful and stylish it looks in the photo, the scanner is made entirely of plastic (it just looks like a metal cover in the photo).

I haven’t used a scanner for a long time . the last one was which warmed up for 5 seconds. 10 years later, almost nothing has changed. only warming up became almost imperceptible. But it still fidgets before scanning and each time the nonsense returns to the starting point - and could scan the next page on return. Probably you have to pay for it separately. Pros below: inexpensive, popular you won't find better in this budget tolerable scan speed no separate charger required expected…

Quickly installed the driver and utility from the office. site all at once earned without any dances with a tambourine. In general, the device is worthy, you can take it. Its pros: Design Dimensions USB powered - no power supply, Scanning speed from 7-8 seconds from the moment the button is pressed, does not preheat Scan Quality Possibility of installation vertically Convenient keyboard shortcuts on the scanner itself Functional application with a bunch of settings With one button you can make…

The scanner was not damaged, the wire was intact, when connected, the scanner warmed up - And that's it. Didn't scan. An error occurred in the program: the scanner or the usb wire was not connected, despite the fact that the wire was connected and the scanner was warming up. I think to consider another model. Eh. No luck. With its pros. The scanner itself is very stylish, thanks to the vertical stand - compact, only USB wires. COOL! Has some cons Not working software. Because of this, I had to

I bought this scanner to scan collectible stickers. Unfortunately, the scanner leaves artifacts on the images - vertical stripes, as if the image is not a whole but is made up of vertical stripes. At a resolution of 1200dpi, the stripes go through about 865 px. I wrote a question to canon support. While waiting for an answer. Photos of artifacts attached.

After a day I will add a review)) In general, the scanner is normal for its money. Scans documents normally, for home use or a small office will do. During the day, the noise is not very audible. All the same, it is incorrect to compare a flatbed scanner for $ 70 and a stationary MFP for $ 2,000. For your money - quite normal. For artists and for working with photography - read the reviews, it’s not a fact that it’s suitable. It is better to look with a CCD sensor.

New model, no reviews at all, had to play the lottery. The other new 300 model was completely negative, so it was a little scary to take it (later it turned out that many online stores overestimated the characteristics of this 300 model in relation to the real specification, which is why customers are disappointed). At first glance, it's still the same good old Canon LiDE 220 (previous senior home-office model) with a redesigned and slightly increased scanning speed. Also on the rear panel, the

Bought for remote work and exclusively for working with documents, so photo scanning is not taken into account in the assessment. Honestly, I didn’t scan the pictures, I don’t know. That is, the scope in my case is narrow. By scanning documents. - speed is VERY helpful, it is this quality that I need most of all at work. - generally scans well, good quality from 1 pass. - has already paid for itself. ViewScan detected the scanner easily, I use it mainly out of habit. No problem. I tried the…

To get good quality scans, I would advise you to use standard software and try the effect of the settings on the operation of the device. When scanning through TWAIN and WIA modules in applications, I was much less pleased with the result. Photo distortions (mixing) were also observed when scanning through these photo modules in high resolution. Maybe I haven't tested long enough to get an opinion.

I took home to scan postcards for postcrossing and documents (now they often require one or the other in different places), plus a child for school. There is experience with scanners, so documentation is generally not needed. I admit that the use of functions unknown to me will make the work even more convenient, but I'm fine anyway. Stands upright on the table. Takes up little space. If you need to quickly scan some little thing (postcard or one sheet), then I scan like this. If there are more

The glass and the back of the lid must be perfectly clean, otherwise the scanner scans in pdf format, so it’s better to touch the glass less, and when replacing photos, raise the scanned image with the next image. When you turn it on for the first time, we first go to the canon website, and follow the step-by-step instructions, at the end we connect the scanner and that's it, you can use it.

1) There was a feeling that it was possible to save a thousand and take the younger model lide-300, scanning with a resolution of 1200 dpi for my needs (old photos, documents, books) is clearly redundant, and 2400 is completely useless. 2) Save someone a couple of hours and a bunch of nerve cells. If Linux (in my case mint20) when you try to scan persistently tells you that "device busy" - remove the ippusbxd package and everything will be fine (I did). Let me quote here a blessed message from…