Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 181
  • 5
    122
  • 4
    38
  • 3
    11
  • 2
    6
  • 1
    4

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

very decent summer road tires for a reasonable price, bought in the dimension 215/65R16. For 10 thousand km, wear is acceptable, 40 thousand should last. I flew into small holes a couple of times, this did not affect the rubber in any way, but it is better to be careful. Its pros: Excellent handling on dry and wet pavement, practically does not react to rutting, comfortable enough on rough roads, not very noisy. Its cons: It is extremely sensitive to the level of pressure, it is worth a little…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

What you need, a cool purchase, I advise you.

I took 205/55 R16 in May, I left the season in all modes. I went on vacation to the Crimea via Kyiv. Before that, I drove a Pirelli P7 for 4 years. after changing the rubber, discomfort was immediately felt - too soft, the car reacts to the steering wheel with some delay. It is clear that these are direct consequences. I wanted comfort, get softness, and where softness is worse handling. But for excessive softness I had to pay twice on vacation - 2 wheels had to be thrown away. Side cut on…

Pros
  • Soft, quiet
Cons
  • blurred reactions on the steering wheel

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am delighted, the product is really worthy.

I work on wheel alignment. Every day I come across different types and brands of tires. From my own experience, I chose these tires, I know that they rarely fail. It is important that they are non-directional. Yes, they are soft, afraid of joints, prone to hernia after impact But thanks to this, they hold the road perfectly. At a speed of 140 km / h, the right side flew into a puddle ~ 5 cm deep - it swayed slightly, but cut the water. I recommend pumping up 0.2 atmospheres more than the car…

Pros
  • Confidently holds the road. Quiet.
Cons
  • Soft

I recently bought tires Continental Premium Contact 5 on the recommendation of a friend, took it from a trusted seller, drove about 5 thousand km. Tires showed themselves very well in everything that is required from a tire of this class! 1. They brake very well both on dry and wet pavement! 2. At medium speeds of 80-90 km / h, sharp and protracted turns hold very well and have never failed. (do not slip.) 3. Very quiet and comfortable, all tire bumps just swallow))) saving podvesochku from…

Pros
  • Quiet, comfortable, wear-resistant, high-quality assembly - perfectly balanced on stamped wheels, only 5-10 grams per side is an excellent indicator)!
Cons
  • Haven't found it yet! The only thing that can be the price, but it justifies itself!

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad product, quite normal quality.

For their money - good tires, for urban conditions and even for trips to the dacha in the summer (namely, to the dacha, not to the forest !). For very bad roads, probably not suitable, because. quickly pierced from any small elements. In the forest, the field, I would not go on it. Has pros: Rides well in the rain, wet asphalt. Sufficiently wear-resistant rubber, more than 3 years already rides every summer season. Normal noise, not worse than average. In extreme heat, it does not float on…

Before that, Michelin Energy, Bridgestone Ecopia were on the car, in comparison with them, these tires are the quietest and softest. And the fuel consumption is lower than the Michelins! I was pleased with the handling on black soil after the rain, which was a pleasant surprise for road tires. But, for the first time, I began to go around the car in the morning and check all the wheels, because I had never had so many breakdowns.

Pros
  • 1. Comfort in motion (silence, softness). 2. Confident handling on any surface and weather conditions. 3. Low rolling resistance (consumption decreased by 0.5-0.7L)
Cons
  • Due to the softness of the rubber, in less than 7,000 km, I pierced the tires twice, and not with self-tapping screws, wire, etc., but with some kind of pebbles

Bought a ContiPremiumContact 5 205/55 r16 H, Germany, bought for a class "C" sedan. When choosing rubber, meticulously compared it with the rest of the top tires. The ContiPremiumContact 5 immediately stands out with its increased dimensions, it is about 1cm wider and 1cm taller than all other summer tires of the same size. And Conti5 also has a deeper tread, like winter tires, and it also looks like winter tires on the disk - such plump "buns". Comfort is the softest rubber I have ever…

Pros
  • very soft, quiet, brakes well, on water without problems
Cons
  • Index H, perhaps too soft (rolled)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the level, I am satisfied with everything.

Many write about tires forgetting to indicate the dimension and production . and this is important . I wrote a review after 2022 km of run in different conditions . So tire 205/55 r16 V91 (made in Germany). It's on the Jetta. Working pressure 2.2. (on the spare tire is 205/55 r16 H91, made in 2022 - I’ll say right away that the 2022 rubber is smoother to the touch, the German one is rougher - I didn’t find any other differences except for the speed index) The comparison will be with Dunlop…

Pros
  • Smooth ride, confidently walks on water
Cons
  • Handling, or rather the sharpness of reaction to steering movements

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the level, I am satisfied with everything.

I do not understand people who write about punched rubber. I always drive through the pits, I don’t go around, once I flew into a deep cut, struck power elements under the bumper, sparks flew. At the end of the season, the discs were pretty crumpled, I had to give it to the dressing, AT LEAST THAT RUBBER. When I put it, there were feelings that I changed the chassis, it is controlled smartly. Through puddles at high speed - yes, easily. I bought the same ones for my second car this year.

Pros
  • Gorgeous tyres.
Cons
  • Increased wear is possible.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best price for such a product, I will buy more!

chose tires for a long time, read reviews of European magazines and reviews. In the end, I decided to take them and did not lose. Someone wrote that it is easy to break through, since the cord is soft. Several times I flew into such holes that it’s scary to remember, but no hernias or anything. I recently drove about 5 km on a flat tire (it so happened that I did not notice). As a result, I wiped the strip with a disk right on the cord, but all the threads remained intact, they pumped a…

Pros
  • quietness, softness
Cons
  • did not reveal

195 \ 55 R15 Only positive impressions, I was especially pleased with the grip, as if smeared with honey, in the rain there are also no problems, well, it was clear when I looked at the tread, the only wear resistance in my opinion is not so great, I think 50-60 thousand Enough, with a non-aggressive driving style. As for strength, I can’t say much, because. I try to go around all the holes and so on. I definitely recommend buying.

Pros
  • Very tenacious, holds the road well, moderately soft, behaves great on wet pavement.
Cons
  • Price

Revainrating 4 out of 5

As such, there are no disadvantages, it is convenient to use.

The second season is on Kia Sid 205/55 R16, 2022-made tires. Excellent tires, their biggest plus is silence, I haven’t seen quieter tires yet, I’m surprised at the reviews that write about their noise, this has no basis, very quiet, comfortable and soft rubber, and apparently you have to pay for it faster wear, so I take off 1 point. The stories about the flimsy sidewall also have no basis and they fell into the pits and drove onto the curbs, everything is OK, no hernias, the sidewall of the…

Pros
  • Manageability on dry or wet pavement, comfort, silence, not sensitive to the track.
Cons
  • Quite soft, resulting in faster wear.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I expected mediocre quality, but it was a pleasant surprise.

For good roads, this rubber is ideal. On wet roads and at high speed - super. If the flood (once hit in Hong Kong this spring), then with this rubber the car floats away at a speed of 90 km / h. At a speed of 80 km / h, nothing threatens her on this rubber. The noise from under the wheel arches is gone, unlike Michelin (soundproofing has ceased to excite me at all). And I suffered, I remember very well with a terrible rumble. The knock from the pits and the rail is what appeared along with the

Pros
  • Tires are new german. I read about it in the tests "Behind the wheel". Not cheap - 4600 per piece like. Mileage so far 25,000 km. Now in descending order: 1. Experience in owning only Michelin Pilot Primacy HP and Energy Saver. Conti is slightly more balanced. Nowhere there are obvious punctures in the characteristics. If Michelins were perfect for durability, Conti is yet to find out. But still, a certain averageness of characteristics closer to ideal in Conti is felt as a back seat)). 2. Ideal in corners, rides-licks quickly without roll, good for sporty riding at speeds from 90 to 180 km / h. 3. Braking on any road is very good even with worn out brakes. disks. I'll try to test it on the sand in the near. time. 4. Super in the wet at speeds up to 140 km/h. 5. Soft for passenger comfort, quiet unlike Michelin. This advantage, it seems to me, comes from the feeling on good pavement. On other surfaces, this property may be leveled. 6. Perhaps ideal for ruts. I pass the track on the roads without tension and without loss in speed and stability, i.е. I hardly feel any difference.
Cons
  • 1. Price. It was not easy to get 205/60 R16. Operating instructions: 1. Exchange rate stability - Hong Kongutations. This spring, I replaced the shock absorbers and struts to increase ground clearance, special for the 2022 Renault Scenic II. Perhaps because of the latter fact, instead of starting the shifts at 160-180, the car began to be rearranged at 130 km / h. 2. Pits and tram rails at low speed. It is possible that also due to the increase in ground clearance and a slight tightening of the suspension, the knock from the rubber became very sharp at low speeds. I try to attribute these problems to a greater extent not to rubber, but still to suspension matters. A booming knock from strong irregularities is present. 2. It is erased in 2 seasons, and we throw out the rubber. Even gays pay attention that the rubber "needs to be changed urgently." 3. For some reason, it constantly releases pressure. Pumping 2 times a month (checked, there is no such thing on other rubber). Cuts and punctures are difficult to heal. In general, by the middle of the second summer, the tires were worn out and punctured in many places)))

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

buy, install and you will understand what you paid extra for Different pros: An ideal tire for medium pace driving without particularly sharp lane changes. Swallows bumps on 5+, No vibration from the road. The feeling that you're driving a premium car right away. Keeps the direction, does not meddle. In terms of wear resistance, about Nokian Primacy 3 or more, we will see, it feels a little stronger. Primacy 3, for comparison, has an even softer bottom, worn out in 2 seasons, at the end of the…

Revainrating 3 out of 5

In general, everything is not bad, but I expected more.

In principle, everything is in shortcomings, but maybe I would have bought it if finances allowed me to change tires every two seasons, or even earlier, maybe I need to take a Finnish one, I had a Slovak one. Different pros: not noisy, very comfortable, excellent road holding on wet and dry pavement, excellent braking properties, any speed on the shoulder. I was driving alone in the pouring rain, I decided to test it, I caught up to 150-160 km. H, everything is super, Lancer 9 car. Different…

Revainrating 3 out of 5

It works, but I don't think I'll be buying it again.

The tires were on the car from the factory, perhaps on purpose some kind of factory order is cheaper, because they are tough and noisy. With its pros: Slow wear. More than 40,000 km have been covered in harsh conditions, and you can still drive for some time before the lighthouses appear. Got cons: Very noisy, very hard - they transmit all the bumps to the body. Compared to winter non-studded Viking 6s - just the wildest rumble on any pavement.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Just super, it's beautifully made, I'm very happy with it.

Handling, braking wet dry asphalt 5+, even more gas in the circle and only easy and manageable skid, current pleasure . The rubber is soft from here all the properties, controllability, sometimes noise (on a bad road), on a flat quiet, for a season on front-wheel drive erased half of the tread =), but I didn’t feel sorry for him . Small bumps are almost not noticeable .

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy with the product, it's very satisfying.

size 195/60, drove about 10,000 on it. Pretty comfortable swallows small bumps, smoothes more, super many brakes write that it bites into the asphalt - this is true, while it does not leave marks on the asphalt, it is very difficult to achieve a screech from it, I forgot about the abs , you stop where you want and when you want, you feel a reserve of braking force, a dry wet road does not notice, aquaplaning after 100 there are small hints, and then when it is flooded with water, in terms of…

Pros
  • in the comments
Cons
  • Expensive

To say that this rubber holds the road perfectly is an understatement. The reason is a special composition that gives softness and, as a result, provides excellent grip on both dry and wet surfaces. The tires are great for a quiet, comfortable ride. Disadvantages are extensions of merits. So, the soft sidewall is the weakest point in the design. In less than 1 year, I got 1 lateral hernia and 3 punctures. Rubber is very good, but not for our roads. Next time I will take with a strong…

Pros
  • Good grip on dry and especially wet roads; short braking distance; softness of passage of small irregularities; low noise level.
Cons
  • Reliability of operation on 2022 roads; Price