Pros
- Strong stopping power but low sensitivity to ruts.
Cons
- Extremely loud levels of noise.
Pros
- Tires in the 17x225/55 Y size are top-notch all over; the car drives like a dream and handles corners with ease.
Cons
- Not located
Pros
- Gentle and relaxing in nature
Cons
- unidentified at this time
Pros
- The following are some of the benefits I've noticed. 1. heaved water down (at a puddle's entry - water splashed down) 2. extremely silent It's more noticeable that the automobile is rolling (with manual transmission vehicles). Four, the entire time it was in use, not a single stone became lodged in the tread. Five, the summer tires seem to get less gas mileage than their predecessors. Six, there was not a single "puncture" (albeit this may have been due in part to good luck and talent on the side of the driver).
Cons
- a hefty outlay of cash, but "you grieve once and celebrate for years."
Pros
- Beautiful
Cons
- harsh and loud
Pros
- Calm, supple, and capable of entering a long turn at high speed with no heel; also performs well in very moderate mud. It can confidently travel up to 120 mph on dry asphalt.
Cons
- Not quite out in the open
Pros
- soft, quiet, you can safely drive into a puddle, into a rut.
Cons
- a hernia came out for the second season
Pros
- Good: hold the road, stopping distance to a minimum. Wear resistance, sidewall is soft and durable
Cons
- The watercolor is average, could be better.
Pros
- Almost silent, wear-resistant, withstands bumps in 2022 roads
Cons
- Not found
Pros
- Possibly there
Cons
- Production in 2022
Pros
- + Rides through puddles generally well, especially new
Cons
- * for 3-4 years it was erased by 3/4, but this is probably normal *soft cord * expensive now, I wouldn’t take it for 3k (I took it for 2300 somewhere)
Pros
- This rubber is very similar in quality to sports tires. It gives precise and precise controllability. It feels like it has pretty good braking performance. At the same time, it holds the road perfectly both on dry and wet surfaces.
Cons
- My main complaint is that these tires are noisy. Even taking into account the additionally noisy arches and bottom, the noise from the wheels still cannot be called comfortable. The rumble appears at 80 km / h and grows with speed. The second point, with this rubber, the steering wheel becomes noticeably heavier. At first I decided that I was covered with the EUR, then I read the reviews and realized that I was not the only one - it was the rubber. At high speed, this is of course great, as the taxiing becomes more accurate. But at city speeds, I would prefer a lighter steering wheel. And third, this rubber is tough. My last summer tire was a relatively inexpensive Michelin Primacy 3, and now it was much quieter and softer, despite the fact that the handling was not much worse on it. The only way Conti is better than Michelin is that it performs better on wet surfaces.
Pros
- Size: 195/65/15 for Suzuki SX4 sedan. Comparison mainly with the Hankook Kinergy eco 425 currently used on the front end. Liked: - controllability (BUT! until they "float" - see the comment below) - and at the same time softness - road grip - better than ever: - The balance is excellent (not a single load initially). But after 2 years, a slight beating in the steering wheel still appeared - rebalanced (harnesses) and everything is in order for a couple more years. - Aquaplaning is extremely rare. Only with VERY "big water" and at a speed of 90 km / h (i. E. on solid 5) - Braking = "Oh yeah!" :)) Both dry and wet. - Noise, or rather its almost absence (only the wind in the drainage system. The grooves howl at speed, but there is no noise from touching the roadway (unlike the Hankooks) - Working out in a rut is understandable and predictable BUT! until they "float" (see comment below). . - Rare slippage on dry pavement with a sharp start + on wet pavement when the gas is on the floor on the 2nd / 3rd - slippage almost never happens (unlike Hankuk) - No fear of axle drift when passing sharp turns at high speed (above 70 mph and an angle of 110-100 degrees), but not on wet asphalt (did not risk it). - No FLOWERS or other quirks on the outside tires - strict stylish design - not a single hernia in 4 years of "crazy swotting" on domestic off-road federal highways and their understudies on a fully loaded car - Absence of side cuts / abrasions with regular snoring on the parebriki and side entry into them (unlike Nokia Haka Green 4)
Cons
- - strength: of course, the absence of hernias is insanely pleasing, despite the fact that I collected VERY MUCH pits of bumps and potholes in 2 years. And those pits / potholes were simply unreal! Who drove along the left bank of the Volga from Hong Kong to Hong Kong on 15x or less wheels at a speed of more than 60 km / h will understand .;) However, the number of harnesses (punctures) for 3 years and the size of holes from self-tapping screws are simply killing! :((( (unlike the hankooks standing in front). - One wheel, being lowered to 1.6-1.5 atm, exploded at low speed and a small hole - The pits practically don’t “swallow” at all: they “slap” hard (loudly) on the small ones, and strong hammering on the large ones :(( (there is a suspicion that they are compressed strongly, to the disk - and there is a blow to the suspension). - For 4 years and 70 tkm, they were almost erased to "0"
Pros
- Comfortable, soft, quiet, stable, braking credits.
Cons
- Not found yet
Pros
- quiet, no aquaplaning, keeps track. Good grip when braking and accelerating
Cons
- a little soft, as a result of which it seems that information content disappears.
Pros
- Very quiet, soft, perfectly keeps the car on the road.
Cons
- Did not reveal
Pros
- quiet, soft, durable
Cons
- did not find
Pros
- + Quiet + Comfortable + good grip
Cons
- Have not found
