Pros
- Wear resistance, excellent rowing, does not wash out immediately, price.
Cons
- When balancing, the average weight is 100g
Cordiant Off Road 205/70 R15 96Q summer Review
40
·
Very good
Rating
4.4
Automotive, 🏎️ Performance Car Parts & Accessories, 🦾 Bearings & Seals, 🏎️ Performance Car Parts & Accessories
Media
(9)
Photos by authors
(1)
Description of Cordiant Off Road 205/70 R15 96Q summer
Cordiant Off Road - the upgraded tire behaves confidently in the most difficult operating conditions, guaranteeing the driver confidence behind the wheel: Unsurpassed overcoming of any obstacles and excellent handling in difficult road conditions: sand, clay, mud. The use of a new metal cord significantly increases the rigidity and tensile strength of the breaker belt and the reliability of tires. Breakdown protection. Tread Features/BenefitsClimbing any obstacles and getting out of deep ruts: Thanks to powerful side lugs. Excellent self-cleaning of the tread from mud, snow and gravel: Thanks ...
Pros
- Off-road victors could benefit from this low-cost and reliable alternative.
Pros
- Patency, price
Cons
- Noise on asphalt, handling on asphalt.
Pros
- 1. Drape everything in sight 2. M/T tires that are both affordable and of a good grade. 3. Shniva is a beautiful addition to their appearance. 4. pliable; I'd forgotten what the divots and cracks on the road were called 5. long-lasting 6. Make haste to clean up
Cons
- only those that arise from the very construction of M/T rubber, which makes it a bit noisy (although the dispenser is much noisier). 2 not for winter (I haven't tried it, but 90% of winter reviews are negative, and I won't chance taking Cordiant Snow Cross of the same size) not for winter (I haven't tried it, but 90% of winter reviews are negative) 3. rolling cannot occur (when using such a tread). 4. When driving in muddy areas, I take extra precautions. (there are no furrows for drainage) 5. They create their burrows in sand and pebbles.
Pros
- Excellent rows
Cons
- Rigid in size 235/75-15
Pros
- It rows very well, and even in very muddy conditions there is no sign of sliding. A very large tread that is easy to clean. A difficult ascent up a mountain made of clay in the rain was accomplished without incident. Never has it been tainted. Digs nicely in snow. Soft. On the racetrack, it maintains a position of relative assurance for this type of rubber. There was no sound that I could hear. They were perfectly balanced, although I had to bring quite a bit of cargo with me.
Cons
- None available at this pricing point.
Pros
- Niva 1996 (I only drink it during the summer). Some advantages for such a low price: - rowing in the mud is great - normally holds the floor of the atmosphere on the sand and in the mud - never had problems on wet pavement, also in puddles - like on asphalt - at speed, because of the noise of the transfer case, you still can't hear them (although the noise is on the car), it keeps 120 kilometers per hour normally on the highway - who says hard - it is soft (if the pressure The amount of gasoline used has not grown. Despite the fact that he has only learned it after two years, he is able to get out of the rut normally.
Cons
- This is MT, and that is all I have to report from here: - bites off the front end (the collapse of similarity must be followed; this is a requirement). - heavy tires (it is not recommended to use heavy wheels) - for some reason they complain while the tire is being fitted - maybe there is something more, but not for me
Pros
- Even on a climb that is not overly steep, it maneuvers effectively in the mud. In the past, my ShNiva was equipped with Kama Euro 205/75/15 tires. Even with 205 cordians, there was no noticeable change in the acceleration dynamics. Only 5 millimeters of ground clearance have been lost in the process. (Its diameter is even a little bit bigger than what was reported.) There has been no increase in the amount of fuel consumed. On dry pavement, it works quite well, but when it's wet, it becomes more difficult. Slightly inferior to Kama Euro, but not "oak" in quality.
Cons
- It buzzes occasionally even though I had prepared myself for the worst. Never believe anyone who tells you that you can't hear her. In particular, somewhere between 50 and 80 miles per hour, sometimes known as the "urban" speed. If the score is 100 or higher, the sound is hardly detectable over the background noise (the vehicle is brand new). I did not test MTGudrich or any of the other imports, but I read in the magazine "Behind the Wheel" that they were humming as well. It does not do a very good job of breaking out of the cycle. There is a tremor on the steering wheel whenever the brakes are applied, but they are just minor inconveniences. I gave it a shot during the winter, but I didn't enjoy it because it was difficult to control on the ice and it dug holes in the snow.
Pros
- Sufficient capacity to run cross-country, normal price, light weight, excellent balance (20-25 grams), and durable cord.
Cons
- On the ice during the winter, you run the risk of perishing! Dimension . I'd want to request the 31st.
Pros
- The most significant benefit is the affordable price, in addition to the superb performance on asphalt.
Cons
- Not developed side lugs
Pros
- smooth and not noisy; pricing stability and predictability
Cons
- It is very simple to get stuck in the mud, as there are no side lugs.
Pros
- Both the price and the dirt protection
Cons
- Extremely vulnerable sidewalls
Pros
- It paddles effectively, maintains its grip in the muck, is easy to clean, and has a reasonable amount of traction on dry land—at least adequate for the Niva. Price traveled a total of 140. There is now a wider range of sizes.
Cons
- You are not required to drive during the winter months, but I did so anyhow. Noisy, but it's mud tires. In point of fact, there are no areas for improvement.
