A few advantages are low cost, acceptable noise level, and a speed index of V. Unquestionably superior to the Chinese version. Maintains directional control, does not sway excessively in potholes, and reduces speed when it begins to rain. Got cons: Naturally hefty and curved, balanced, with an additional 40-50 grams each wheel. When one considers the cost, there are no disadvantages.

At first, when I was putting on my shoes, I enjoyed that it goes softer, swallowing little joints in the asphalt and patches. Eventually, I came to dislike that it goes softer. I was relieved to purchase it once I located it in the pouring rain, where I had also arranged everything else. I had to go to the track after I had spent the previous three weeks riding around the city at speeds of no more than 50 miles per hour. After going 100–110 kilometers per hour, a vibration could be felt…

The price is almost certainly going to be lower than that of the other companies in the market, but in exchange, you are going to receive a lot of noise from the wheels, and the subject of quality should be considered. It seems as though a guarantee showed up at Cordiant as well as their representative offices, which is the same as what happened with Nokian. When you are purchasing, make sure you mention whether or not the wheels can be returned if they become square. I also have a winter set…

Some pros: Outstanding ability to hold the road. Very astute in terms of management. Superior road holding in the wet conditions. It has a good handling even on rough roads. Having these drawbacks: Noisy. The level of noise, on the other hand, is roughly consistent with expectations. It's much better that you have the sense that you are moving forward.

At a speed of 100 km/h on a dunlop in the automobile (lancer x), there was a noise compared to the stock dunlop sport tires heaven and earth; now it is substantially quieter. Holds the road at least as well as before, and even better in ruts, in my opinion. On Dunlope, I was generally frightened to drive through puddles. The car did not lose traction when I drove through a very deep puddle at speed yesterday; otherwise, I believe I would already be flying on dunlope.

Do not invest time or resources on it. The evaluation is as impartial as possible and was not in exchange for anything. Prepared to tell the manufacturer the same thing. There is no shortage of rubber, but I'd prefer to show some love to homegrown industry by purchasing products made here in the USA. Consider these comments before making a purchase. They're distinct in their current forms. Pieces started falling off of her, according to one writer, who added, though, that she still drives…

For the money, nice tires, 160 km/h outstanding road holding, average rain of norms, heavy rain of 120 km/h no more, for the second season it started to deteriorate gradually, not critically, pits rails no hernias, size 205/55/16, balancing fire.

Has some pros: Surprisingly, they have a good grip on the road even when the surface is wet. If it is moved to a side stall, then it can be managed more effectively. Brakes work effectively, and there are no abnormalities in directional stability. In general, typical handling is acceptable for family vacations, even when traveling through the mountains. Got cons: The geometry and balance of these wheels is a significant flaw, which is the primary reason why it is not worthwhile to get them…

I wouldn't spend more than $4000 here (2500-3000 is still acceptable). I applied it to two vehicles. R13 and r15. R13 sidewall punctured by a pinprick, yet still managed to coast by. R15 often skated a maximum of 15t kilometres per day. The front ones disintegrated completely. The rear appears to be conscious. Before that, they drove on rails, went over bumps, did the figure eight, and were shaken to the floor for four months. They were patient and determined to see how long they could make it.

Departure for them on the Camry in the amount of 215, 65, and 16 for approximately 90 thousand dollars. Previously, there was a group known as the Bridzhik Potenza S001. Stronger is always better. whereas, when the system is first put into action, there is no discernible improvement; whereas, aquaplaning is quickly improved when using Cordiant. The driving style is quite dynamic, the demolition is predictable, and the "hold," while not ideal, is good. The tires only last for a maximum of two…

The following are some advantages: with the possible exception of the cost, however, I'm not sure that it's really worth the denyuk. Some cons: 1) curve. After twisting it four times, the installers warned that there may be vibrations. It appears that this is not deemed to be a marriage, and you will be required to travel. 2) Noisy, the rumble can be attributed to PPC.

I spend most of my time driving along the St. Petersburg Ring Road, the Hong Kong Ring Road, the m-11, and the m-4. The rezya is excellent; I skated on it for two seasons. However, the city itself is also there in this instance. I was especially pleased with the fact that it handles itself competently in corners on serpentines that stretch from Hong Kong to Hong Kong. I did it like you would in racing and rode it through the night down the serpentines: third gear, foot flat on the floor, and…

The 195/65R15 tire weighs in at a light 8.4 kg. Even if I don't save money on gas because of these tires, I know I won't shred the sidewall and have to buy a new set of tires anytime soon because of the holes. Despite its lack of sportiness, there are periods when the speed restriction is over 200 km/h; then, when cordiant puts a big plus speed index of 240 km/h; and finally, when the tread resembles a bridge. I anticipated a lot of commotion and some clogging due to the stones. It's…

Just ordered. According to reviews, like rubber on a solid 4, I went into the previous season on the standard, and as is customary, the cordiant creates noise but is able to handle other responsibilities. Regarding the pliability of the rubber when it is not on asphalt, I will say one thing: any rubber with a sport attribute is designed for driving only on asphalt; nevertheless, when it is not on asphalt, the pliability is poor. To my comrades: If you want rubber for mud, then choose a tread…

Its pros: Strong sidewall, wear-resistant, solid tread pattern (universal use) Different cons: Noisy, harsh in control (in the limit values ​​there is a slight instability)

Not noisy, quite manageable tires, puddles accelerates. If this release of rubber is stronger, then the company is credited.